Marx’s Theory of Labor Subsumption: Restatement and Critical Assessment

References

• Anderson, W., and F. Thompson. 1988. ‘Neoclassical Marxism.’ Science & Society 52: 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, C. 2009. ‘The Possessive Spirit of Capital: Subsumption/ Inversion/ Contradiction.’ In Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives after the Critical Edition, edited by R. Bellofiore, and R. Fineschi. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Banaji, J. 1977. ‘Capitalist Domination in the Small Peasantry: Deccan Districts in the Late Nineteenth Century.’ Economic and Political Weekly 12: 1375–1404.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1990. ‘Contested Exchange: New Microfoundations for the Political Economy of Capitalism.’ Politics and Society 18 (2): 165–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogliano, J., R. Veneziani, and N. Yoshihara. 2016. ‘The Dynamics of Exploitation and Class in Accumulation Economies.’ Metroeconomica 67: 242–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, R. 2012. ‘Reconceptualizing Capitalism: Forms of Subsumption of Labor, Class Struggle, and Uneven Development.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 44: 178–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, R. 2017. Marxist Class Theory for a Skeptical World. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R. 2020. Critical Reflections on Economy and Politics in India: A Class Theory Perspective. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, J., and G. Dymski. 1991. ‘Roemer’s Theory of Exploitation is a Special Case: The Limits of Walrasian Marxism.’ Economics and Philosophy 7: 235–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J., and D. Martimort. 2001. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse: Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1978. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 2. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1981. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 3. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1988. Collected Works, Volume 30. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1989a. Collected Works, Volume 31. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1989b. Collected Works, Volume 32. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1991. Collected Works, Volume 33. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1994. Collected Works, Volume 34. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morishima, M. 1973. Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morishima, M., and G. Catephores. 1978. Value, Exploitation, and Growth. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, P. 2004. ‘The Social and Material Transformation of Production by Capital: Formal and Real Subsumption in Capital, Vol. I.’ In The Constitution of Capital: Essays on Volume I of Marx’s Capital, edited by R. Bellofiore, and N. Taylor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, S., and M. Cerman. 1996. ‘Proto-Industrialization, Economic Development and Social Change in Early Modern Europe.’ In European Proto-Industrialization, edited by S. Ogilvie, and M. Cerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, M., and J. Devine. 1981. ‘The Microeconomics of Conflict and Hierarchy in Capitalist Production.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 12: 27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, W. 2009. ‘Abstraction and Productivity: Structures of Intentionality and Action in Marx’s Capital.’ In Karl Marx and Contemporary Philosophy, edited by A. Chitty, and M. McIvor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. 1982. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. 1986. Value, Exploitation and Class. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Screpanti, E. 2017. ‘Karl Marx on Wage Labor: From Natural Abstraction to Formal Subsumption.’ Rethinking Marxism 29 (4): 511–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Screpanti, E. 2019. Labor and Value. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Skillman, G. 1995. ‘Ne Hic Saltaveris: The Marxian Theory of Exploitation after Roemer.’ Economics and Philosophy 11: 309–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillman, G. 2013. ‘Marx's Missing “Results”: A Tale of Two Theories.’ History of Political Economy 45 (3): 475–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillman, G. 2014. ‘Capitalist Exploitation without Capitalist Production: The Implications of Imperfect Contracting.’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 26 (4): 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillman, G. 2017. ‘Production Relations in Agrarian Capitalist Development: A Comment on Das (2012).’ Review of Radical Political Economics 49: 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomba, M. 2009. ‘Historical Temporalities of Capital: An Anti-Historicist Perspective.’ Historical Materialism 17: 44–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrousalis, N. 2018. ‘Capital without Wage-Labour: Marx’s Modes of Subsumption Revisited.’ Economics and Philosophy 34 (Special Issue 3): 411–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. 1994. ‘Marx: From “The Critique of Political Economy” to Capital.’ Studies in Marxism 1: 89–105.
   Google Scholar