The Ethics and Politics of Care: Reshaping Economic Thinking and Practice

References

• Agarwal, B. 2021. ‘Imperatives of Recognising the Complexities: Gendered Impacts and Responses to COVID-19 in India.’ Economia Politica 39: 31–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B., R. Venkatachalam, and F. Cerniglia. 2021. ‘Women, Pandemics and the Global South: An Introductory Overview.’ Economia Politica 39: 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostino, A., R. Elmhirst, M. Gomez, W. Harcourt, and P. Kotsila. 2023. ‘Introduction: Sketching out the Contours.’ In Contours of Feminist Political Ecology, edited by W. Harcourt, A. Agostino, R. Elmhirst, M. Gómez, and P. Kotsila. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, S., B. Van Dyck, D. Sharma, and A. Stirling. 2020. ‘Control, Care, and Conviviality in the Politics of Technology for Sustainability.’ Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16 (1): 247–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, N. 2020. ‘Black Women in the United States and Unpaid Collective Work: Theorizing the Community as a Site of Production.’ The Review of Black Political Economy 47 (4): 343–362.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, S. 2020. Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, S., G. D. Chiro, W. Harcourt, I. Iengo, P. Kotsila, S. Kulkarni, and C. Sato. 2023. ‘Caring Communities for Radical Change: What Can Feminist Political Ecology Bring to Degrowth?’ In Contours of Feminist Political Ecology, edited by W. Harcourt, A. Agostino, R. Elmhirst, M. Gómez, and P. Kotsila. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bauhardt, C. 2014. ‘Solutions to the Crisis? Green New Deal, Degrowth, and Solidarity Economy: Alternatives to the Capitalist Growth Economy from a Feminist Economics Perspective.’ Ecological Economics 102: 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauhardt, C., and W. Harcourt 2018. Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care: In Search of Economic Alternatives. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Benería, L. 2003. Gender, Development, and Globalization. Economics as if All People Mattered. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, M. L., and M. G. Cuervo. 2021. ‘The Pandemic as a Portal: Policy Transformations Disputing the new normal’. Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era (DAWN) Discussion Paper No.32. Suva Fiji: DAWN.
   Google Scholar
• Boianovsky, M. 2022. ‘Geoffrey Colin Harcourt (1931-2021): A Cambridge Economist from Down Under.’ CHOPE Working Paper No. 2022-05. Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4104559.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo Arias, A. 2022. Contested Care Politics: Perspectives in- Against-and-Beyond the State in the Times of Chilean Institutional Reconfiguration.’ Research Paper Design. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Budlender, D., ed. 2010. Time Use Studies and Unpaid Care Work. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, B. J., and B. Shear. 2014. ‘Introduction: Engaged Scholarship for non-Capitalist Political Ecologies.’ Journal of Political Ecology 21 (1): 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., G. Feola, A. Fischer, R. Fletcher, J. F. Gerber, W. Harcourt, M. Koster, et al. 2021. ‘Planning for a World Beyond COVID-19: Five Pillars for Post-Neoliberal Development.’ World Development. April 140: 105357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabnal, L. 2010. Feminismos Diversos: El Feminismo Comunitario. Madrid: ACSUR-Las Segovias.
   Google Scholar
• Cirmi Obon, B. 2017. ‘Who Flies the Kite? Argentinean Parental Leave Design: Care Penalties for the Included and the Excluded Families’ ISS MA Research Paper. http://hdl.handle.net/2105/41665.
   Google Scholar
• Collantes, C. 2016. ‘Reproductive Dilemmas, Labour and Remittances: Gender and Intimacies in Cavite, Philippines.’ South East Asia Research 24 (1): 77–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curty, G. 2020. ‘Rethinking Capitalism, Crisis, and Critique: An Interview With Nancy Fraser.’ Critical Sociology 46 (7–8): 1327–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAWN. 2022. DAWN Discussion Papers 2021-2. Suva, Fiji: DAWN. https://dawnnet.org/discussion-papers/.
   Google Scholar
• Dengler, C., and M. Lang. 2021. ‘Commoning Care: Feminist Degrowth Visions for a Socio-Ecological Transformation.’ Feminist Economics 28 (1): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Chiro, G. 2019. ‘Care not Growth: Imagining a Subsistence Economy for all.’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21 (20): 303–311.
   Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R. 2018. ‘Ecologicas Politicas Feministas: Perspectivas Situadas y Abordajes Emergentes’ [Feminist Political Ecologies: Situated Perspectives, Emerging Engagements].’ Ecologia Politica 54 (1): 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B., and A. Hochschild2004. Global Woman. Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, D. 1991. Male Bias in the Development Process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 1994. Who Pays for the Kids?: Gender and the Structures of Constraint. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 2001. The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 2012. For Love and Money. Care Provision in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 2014. ‘Who’s Cares? A Feminist Critique of the Care Economy.’ Discussions Paper. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. https://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/sonst_publikationen/folbre_whocares.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 2017. The Care Penalty and Gender Inequality. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 2020. ‘Cooperation & Conflict in the Patriarchal Labyrinth.’ Daedalus 149 (1): 198–212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48563041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraga, C., and C. Rodríguez Enríquez. 2022. ‘Argentina. The Pathway Towards the National Care System.’ DAWN Discussion Papers 36. Suva (Fiji): DAWN.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2016. ‘Contradictions of Capital and Care.’ New Left Review 100 (July/August), 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2020. ‘Taking Care of Each Other Is Essential Work’ Interview by Clio Chang. VICE. https://www.vice.com/en/article/jge39g/taking-care-of-each-other-is-essential-work.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., and R. Jaeggi. 2018. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. 2011. ‘Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-Placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism.’ Feminist Formations 23 (2): 26–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., D. Bird Rose, and R. Fincher2015. Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. NY: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2008. ‘Diverse Economies: Performative Practices for Other Worlds.’ Progress in Human Geography 32 (5): 613–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2011. ‘A Feminist Project of Belonging for the Anthropocene.’ Gender, Place and Culture 18 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Green New Deal for Europe. 2019. ‘Blueprint for Europe’s Just Transition’. Report. https://report.gndforeurope.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Blueprint-for-Europes-Just-Transition-2nd-Ed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.’ Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C. 2014. ‘Introduction.’ The Economics Labour Relations Review 25 (4): 548–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W. 2014. ‘The Future of Capitalism. A Consideration of Alternatives.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (6): 1307–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W. 2022. ‘Reflections on the Violence of Development.’ Development published on-line 30 August 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W., A. Agostino, R. Elmhirst, M. Gomez, and P. Kotsila, eds. 2023. Contours of Feminist Political Ecology. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W., and I. L. Nelson, eds. 2015. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the “Green Economy”. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N., S. Razavi, and Y. van der Meulen Rodgers. 2021. ‘Feminist Economic Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic.’ Feminist Economics 27 (1-2): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., S. Paulson, G. D’Alisa, and F. Demaria. 2020. The Case for Degrowth. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, S., B. Akbulut, F. Demaria, and J.-F. Gerber. 2022. ‘Alternatives to Sustainable Development: What Can we Learn from the Pluriverse in Practice?’ Sustainability Science 17: 1149–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, and A. Acosta, eds. 2019. Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, M. 2021. ‘Buen Vivir as a Territorial Practice. Building a More Just and Sustainable Life Through Interculturality.’ Sustainability Science 17: 1287–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. 2006. Beyond Mothering Earth: Ecological Citizenship and the Politics of Care. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, A. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. 1995. Earthcare: Women and the Environment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, A. 2019. ‘On the Value of Social Reproduction: Informal Labour, the Majority World and the Need for Inclusive Theories and Politics.’ Radical Philosophy 204. Spring:33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, A. 2022. ‘Social Reproduction and Pandemic Neoliberalism: Planetary Crises and the Reorganisation of Life, Work and Death.’ Organization 29 (3): 379–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreton-Robinson, A. 2009. ‘The Good Indigenous Citizen: Race, War and the Pathology of Patriarchal White Sovereignty.’ Cultural Studies Review 15 (20): 62–79.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2015. ‘Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices.’ Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 717–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. ‘Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.’ Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2012. ‘"Nothing Comes Without its World": Thinking with Care.’ The Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2017. Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 2007. ‘The Political and Social Economy of Care in a Development Context Conceptual Issues, Research Questions and Policy Options.’ Gender and Development Programme Paper. No. 3 June. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Resurrección, B. P. 2017. ‘“Gender and Environment from ‘Women, Environment and Development” to Feminist Political Ecology.’ In Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment, edited by S. MacGregor. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. L. 2002. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todaro, R., and I. Arriagada. 2002. ‘Global Care Chains.’ In Companion to Women’s and Gender Studies, edited by N. Naples. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. 2010. ‘Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose.’ Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2): 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J., and B. Fisher. 1990. ‘Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring.’ In Circles of Care, edited by E. Abel, and M. Nelson. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A., N. Bubandt, E. Gan, and H. A. Swanson. 2017. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, M. 1988. If Women Counted. A New Feminist Economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yeates, N. 2004. ‘Global Care Chains.’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 6 (3): 369–391.
   Google Scholar
• Zechner, M. 2021. Commoning Care & Collective Power: Childcare Commons and the Micropolitics of Municipalism in Barcelona. Vienna: Transversal Texts.
   Google Scholar