Musicking, embodiment and participatory enaction of music: outline and key points

References

• Auvray, M., & Rohde, M. (2012). Perceptual crossing: The simplest online paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(181). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barandiaran, X. E. (2008). Mental life: A naturalized approach to the autonomy of cognitive agents (PhD thesis). University of the Basque Country.
   Google Scholar
• Barandiaran, X. E., Di Paolo, E., & Rohde, M. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17, 367. doi: 10.1177/1059712309343819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972/2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. O. (2004). Deep listeners: Music, emotion, and trancing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blacking, J. (1973). How musical is man? London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Borgo, D. (2005). Sync or swarm: Improvising music in a complex age. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2010). For a relational musicology: Music and interdisciplinarity, beyond the practice turn. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 135(2), 205–243. doi: 10.1080/02690403.2010.506265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmann, T., Di Paolo, E., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2013). A dynamical systems account of sensorimotor contingencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappuccio, M., & Froese, T. (Eds.). (2014). Enactive cognition at the edge of sense-making: Making sense of non-sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, E. F., Dibben, N., & Pitts, S. (2010). Music and mind in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colombetti, G. (2013). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, N. (1990). Music, imagination and culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuffari, E., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2014). From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–37. doi: 10.1007/s11097-014-9404-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. doi: 10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
   Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441–447. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 444–460. doi: 10.1177/1059712309343822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 429–452. doi: 10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (Eds.). (2015). Towards an embodied science of intersubjectivity: Widening the scope of social understanding research. Lausane: Frontiers Media.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction and play. In J. R. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, M. D., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2014). Modeling habits as self-sustaining patterns of sensorimotor behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/Abstract.aspx?s=537&name=human_neuroscience&ART_DOI=10.3389/fnhum.2014.00590 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, S. (1990). Sound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics, and song in kaluli expression (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, S. (1996). Performing rites: Evaluating popular music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. (2009). Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 439–463. doi: 10.1007/s11097-009-9140-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. (2010). Modelling social interaction as perceptual crossing: An investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science, 22(1), 43–68. doi: 10.1080/09540090903197928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. (2011). The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1075/pc.19.1.01fr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, T., Iizuka, H., & Ikegami, T. (2014). Using minimal human-computer interfaces for studying the interactive development of social awareness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1061), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–486. doi: 10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Bower, M. (2014). Making enactivism even more embodied. AVANT. Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej, 5(2), 232–247.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2007). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geeves, A., McIlwain, D. J., & Sutton, J. (2014). The performative pleasure of imprecision: A diachronic study of entrainment in music performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(863). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geeves, A., & Sutton, J. (2014). Embodied cognition, perception, and performance in music. Empirical Musicology Review, 9(3–4), 247–253. doi: 10.18061/emr.v9i3-4.4538
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology ( D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (2010). Enaction, imagination, and insight. In J. R. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 425–450). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klemm, T., Schomacher, E., & Söffner, J. (2011). Enactive criticism: Research as embodiment. In F. Pellizzi (Eds.), Res: Anthropology and aesthetics, 59/60: Spring/autumn 2011 (pp. 318–324). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/Abstract.aspx?s=1109&name=theoretical_and_philosophical_psychology&ART_DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01003. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyselo, M., & Di Paolo, E. (2013). Locked-in syndrome: A challenge for embodied cognitive science. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s11097-013-9344-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, M., & Maes, P. (2014). The role of embodiment in the perception of music. Empirical Musicology Review, 9(3–4), 236–246. doi: 10.18061/emr.v9i3-4.4498
   Google Scholar
• Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. R. (2012). A minimalist approach to perceptual interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(98), doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana, H., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Introduction. In Varela F. J. (Ed.), Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (pp. xi–xxi). Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Matyja, J., & Schiavio, A. (2013). Enactive music cognition: Background and research themes. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 351–357. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/3/351.matyja
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, J. J. (2015). Doing rituals: An enactivist reading of Durkheim’s elementary forms. Intellectica, 63(1), 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2002). Phenomenology of perception ( C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, A. P. (1964). The anthropology of music. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, N. (2014). Social implications arise in embodied music cognition research which can counter musicological individualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/Abstract.aspx?s=196&name=cognitive_science&ART_DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00676 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasuto, S. J., Bishop, J. M., Roesch, E. B., & Spencer, M. C. (2015). Zombie mouse in a Chinese room. Philosophy & Technology, 28(2), 209–223. doi: 10.1007/s13347-014-0150-2
   Google Scholar
• Nettl, B. (2005). The study of ethnomusicology: Thirty-one issues and concepts. University of Illinois Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=d-JOrPwDM4°C
   Google Scholar
• Schiavio, A. (2014a). Action, enaction, inter(en)action. Empirical Musicology Review, 9(3), 1–9. Retrieved from http://emusicology.org/article/view/4440
   Google Scholar
• Schiavio, A. (2014b). Music in (en)action sense-making and neurophenomenology of musical experience (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavio, A., & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactive account of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae. doi: 10.1177/1029864915593333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schyff, D. (2015). Music as a manifestation of life: Exploring enactivism and the eastern perspective for music education. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/Abstract.aspx?s=1109&name=theoretical_and_philosophical_psychology&ART_DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00345 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, M. (2012). Virtue ethics, care ethics, and “the good life of teaching”. Action, Criticism, and Theory of Music Education, 11(2), 96–122. Retrieved from http://act.maydaygroup.org
   Google Scholar
• Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Hanover: Wesleyan/University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, P., & Stewart, J. R. (2009). From autonomy to heteronomy (and back): The enaction of social life. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 527–550. doi: 10.1007/s11097-009-9139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (Association pour la recherche cognitive, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turino, T. (2008). Music as social life: The politics of participation. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, P. (2015). Enactivism and care ethics: Merging perspectives. Filozofia, 70(2), 119–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, A. E., Richardson, M. J., Langland-Hassan, P., & Chemero, A. (2015). Improvisation and the self-organization of multiple musical bodies. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 313–313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97–125. doi: 10.1023/A:1020368120174
   Google Scholar
• Ziemke, T. (2001). Are robots embodied? In C. Balkenious, J. Zlatev, C. Brezeal, H. Kozima, & K. Dautenhaum ( Eds.), Proc. 1st international workshop on epigenetic robotics - modeling cognitive development in robotic systems, Lund University Cognitive Systems 85 (pp. 75–83). Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies.
   Google Scholar