Conditions for cognitive self-organisation implied by visual-word processing

References

• Abeles, M., Hayon, G., & Lehmann, D. (2004). Modeling compositionality by dynamic binding of synfire chains. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 17, 179–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(4), 245–266. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J., & Thurston, I. (1973). An analysis of the word-superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 207–228. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90012-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, G. Q., & Poo, M. M. (1998). Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(24), 10464–10472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S. (2009). On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: Implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Review, 116(1), 220–251. doi: 10.1037/a0014462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braitenberg, V. (1978). Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In R. Heim & G. Palm (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to complex systems (pp. 171–188). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burwick, T. (2014). The binding problem. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(3), 305–315. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carew, T., Pinsker, H., & Kandel, E. (1972). Long-term habituation of a defensive withdrawal reflex in aplysia. Science, 175(4020), 451–454. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4020.451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, J. M. (1948). The time it takes to see and name objects, 1886. In W. Dennis & W. Dennis (Eds.), Readings in the history of psychology (pp. 326–328). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi: 10.1037/11304-037
   Google Scholar
• Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalenoort, G. J. (1982). In search of the conditions for the genesis of cell-assemblies: A study in self-organization. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 5, 161–187.
   Google Scholar
• Dalenoort, G. J. (1985). The representation of tasks in active cognitive networks. Cognitive Systems, 1(3), 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Dalenoort, G. J. (1987). Development of concepts. Cognitive Systems, 2, 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Dalenoort, G. J. (1989). Mechanisms of self-organization. In G. J. Dalenoort (Ed.), The paradigm of self-organization (pp. 298–308). New York: Gordon & Breach.
   Google Scholar
• Dalenoort, G. J. (1990). Towards a general theory of representation. Psychological Research, 52(2), 229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalenoort, G. J. (1996). Johannes müller and the systems approach to the problem of specificity of the memory trace. In Proc. 15th Cheiron conference (pp. 31–36). Leiden: Dept. of Psychology, Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Dalenoort, G. J., & de Vries, P. H. (1998). Understanding in terms of correspondences between levels of description. In C. Taddei-Ferretti & C. Musio (Eds.), Downward processes in the perception representation mechanisms (pp. 497–503). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Dandurand, F., Grainger, J., Dunabeitia, J. A., & Granier, J. P. (2011). On coding non-contiguous letter combinations. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandurand, F., Hannagan, T., & Grainger, J. (2013). Computational models of location-invariant orthographic processing. Connection Science, 25(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1080/09540091.2013.801934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Anguilli, A., & Dalenoort, G. J. (1996). Tanzi’s contribution to modern neuroscience. Brain and Cognition, 32, 252–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (Unpublished PhD). University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, P. H. (1995). Downwards emergence in conceptual networks. Cognitive Systems, 4, 233–246.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, P. H. (2004). Effects of binding in the identification of objects. Psychological Research, 69(1-2), 41–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, P. H. (2016). Neural binding in letter- and word-recognition. In K. E. Twomey, A. Smith, G. Westermann, & P. Monaghan (Eds.), Neurocomputational models of cognitive development and processing: Proceedings of the 14th neural computation and psychology workshop (pp. 17–33). New Jersey: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, P. H., & van Slochteren, K. R. (2008). The nature of the memory trace and its neurocomputational implications. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 25, 188–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Evett, L., & Humphreys, G. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 325–350.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2013). The neural binding problem(s). Cognitive Neurodynamics, 7(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11571-012-9219-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries, P. (2009). Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 209–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima, K. (1980). Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 36(4), 193–202. doi: 10.1007/BF00344251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 335–359. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2004). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin & P. Bonin (Eds.), Mental lexicon: “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 1–23). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 58–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg, S. (1978). A theory of human memory: Self-organization and performance of sensory-motor codes, maps, and plans. In R. Rosen & F. Snell (Eds.), Progress in theoretical biology, vol. 5 [Reprinted in Grossberg, S. (1982). Studies of Mind and Brain] (pp. 233–374). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossberg, S. (1980). How does a brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review, 87, 1–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, G. E. (2007). Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 428–434. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 85–104. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. W., Viskontas, I. V., Shankar, K. H., & Fried, I. (2012). Ensembles of human MTL neurons “jump back in time” in response to a repeated stimulus. Hippocampus, 22(9), 1833–1847. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99(3), 480–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104(3), 427–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyck, C. R. (2007). Creating hierarchical categories using cell assemblies. Connection Science, 19(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/09540090600779713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyck, C. R. (2009). Variable binding by synaptic strength change. Connection Science, 21(4), 327–357. doi: 10.1080/09540090902954188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyck, C. R., & Passmore, P. J. (2013). A review of cell assemblies. Biological Cybernetics, 107(3), 263–288. doi: 10.1007/s00422-013-0555-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. C., & McClelland, J. (1974). Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find. Science, 184(4142), 1192–1194. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4142.1192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. R., Dudai, Y., & Mayford, M. R. (2014). The molecular and systems biology of memory. Cell, 157(1), 163–186. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., … Hadsell, R. (2017). Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611835114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRocque, J. J., Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2013). Decoding attended information in short-term memory: An EEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(1), 127–142. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashley, K. S. (1951). In search of the engram. Symposia of the Society of Experimental Biology, 4, 454–482.
   Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.111.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J., McNaughton, B., & O’Reilly, R. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419–457. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, R. C., Munakata, Y., Frank, M. J., Hazy, T. E., & Contributors. (2012). Computational cognitive neuroscience (1st ed.). Wiki Book. Retrieved from http://ccnbook.colorado.edu
   Google Scholar
• Palm, G., Knoblauch, A., Hauser, F., & Schuez, A. (2014). Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 108(5), 559–572. doi: 10.1007/s00422-014-0596-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plenz, D., & Niebur, E. (2014). Criticality in neural systems. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 253–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffone, A., & Wolters, G. (2001). A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(6), 766–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds, J. H., & Desimone, R. (1999). The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron, 24(1), 19–29. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80819-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89(1), 60–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems of 1994 (pp. 1–38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shastri, L., & Ajjanagadde, V. (1993). From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 417–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., … Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489. doi: 10.1038/nature16961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Procedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482 (repr. in H.A. Simon, Sciences of the Artificial, MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA).
   Google Scholar
• Singer, W. (1999). Time as coding space?. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46(1-2), 159–216. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90007-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov, E. (1963). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex. Annual Review of Physiology, 25, 545–580. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sougné, J. (2001). Binding and multiple instantiation in a distributed network of spiking nodes. Connection Science, 13, 99–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(11), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, L., Stark, C., & Clark, R. (2004). The medial temporal lobe. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 279–306. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanzi, E. (1893). I fatti e le induzione nell’odierna istologia del sistema nervoso. Rivista Sperimentale Di Freniatria, 19, 419–472.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40, 201–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Assche, E., & Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 399–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Velde, F., & de Kamps, M. (2006). Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 37–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, C. (2008). Chaos breeds autonomy: Connectionist design between bias and baby-sitting. Cognitive Processing, 9(2), 83–92. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0193-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331–350. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, C. (1981). The correlation theory of brain function. In E. Domany, J. L. Hemmen, & K. Schulten (Eds.), Models of neural networks II (revised version of an internal report 81-2, of dept. Of neurobiology, MPI biophysical chemistry, goettingen, deutschland) (pp. 95–119). Berkin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, C. (1995). Binding in models of perception and brain function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 520–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, C. (1999). The what and why of binding: The modeler’s perspective. Neuron, 24(1), 95–104. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80825-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001a). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001b). Position-specific effects within the SERIOL framework of letter-position coding. Connection Science, 13(3), 235–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, M. J., Jochim, J., Akyurek, E. G., & Stokes, M. G. (2017). Dynamic hidden states underlying working-memory-guided behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 20(6), 864–871. doi: 10.1038/nn.4546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar