Gendered subjectivities of spacetimematter

References

• Andreassen, R. 2013. “Take Off that Veil and Give Me Access to Your Body: An Analysis of Danish Debates about Muslim Women's Head and Body Covering.” In I Shifting Control: Gender and Migration Policy, 1917–2010, edited by Schrover and Moloney. Amsterdam: University Press B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Half Way – Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/Continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.” Derrida Today 3 (2): 240–268. doi: 10.3366/drt.2010.0206
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2012. “Nature's Queer Performativity.” Kvinder, Koen og Forskning 21 (1–2): 25–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brah, A., and A. Phoenix. 2004. “Ain't I a Woman. Intersectionality Revisited.” Journal of International Women Studies 5 (3): 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, S. M. 2013. “The Materiality of Fieldwork: An Ontology of Feminist Becoming.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (5): 599–609. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.786845
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. 1994. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Colour.” In The Public Nature of Private Violence, edited by M. Fineman and R. Mykitiuk, 93–118. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2000. A Body of Writing. Walnuc Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2010. “The Struggle Between the Individualised Subject of Phenomenology and the Multiplicities of the Poststructuralist Subject: The Problem of Agency.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 1 (1): 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., and I. van der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duits, L., and L. Van Zoonen. 2006. “Headscarves and Porno-Chic: Disciplining Girl's Bodies in the European Multicultural Society.” European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (2): 103–117. doi: 10.1177/1350506806062750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1976. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1984. Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias Diakritics, 22–27, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1986. “Space, Knowledge and Power.” In The Foucault Reader, edited by P. Rabinow, 239–254. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, R. 1993. White Women, Race Matters. The Social Construction of Whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, R. 1997. Displacing Whiteness. Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S., A. Phoenix, and R. Pattman. 2002. Young Masculinities. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Højgaard, L., M. Juelskjær, and D. Søndergaard. 2012. “The What of and the What If of Agential Realism – In Search of the Gendered Subject.” Kvinder, Koen og Forskning 21 (1–2): 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Højgaard, L., and D. M. Søndergaard. 2011. “Theorizing the Complexities of Discursive and Material Subjectivity: Agential Realism and Poststructural Analysis.” Theory & Psychology 3 (3): 338–354. doi: 10.1177/0959354309359965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., and L. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data among Multiple Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjaer, M. 2009. En ny start – bevægelser i/gennem tid, rum, krop og sociale kategorier [A new beginning – movement through time, space, bodies and social categories]. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M., and N. Schwennesen. 2012. “Intra-active Entanglements: An Interview with Karen Barad.” Kvinder, Koen og Forskning 21 (1–2): 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M., D. Staunæs, and H. Ratner. 2013. “The Return of the Freudian Couch.” International Journal of Qualitative studies in Education 26 (9): 1132–1152. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.816885
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, G. 2005. “Race, Class, Gender: Reclaming Baggage in Fast Travelling Theories.” European Journal of Women's Studies 12: 249–265. doi: 10.1177/1350506805054267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofoed, J. 2005. “Holddeling: Når der gøres maskulinitet og hvidhed.” Kvinder, Køn og Forskning 3: 42–52 (eng.: Selecting the team: doing masculinity and whiteness).
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. 2010. Going Beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education: Introducing an Intra-active Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. 2013. “Images of Thinking in Feminist Materialisms: Ontological Divergences and the Production of Researcher Subjectivities.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 706–716. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788759
   Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. 2010. Feminist Studies. A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual. Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs 30 (3): 1771–1800. doi: 10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myong, L. 2009. Adopteret: Fortællinger om transnational og racialiseret tilblivelse. Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole, Aarhus Universitet. (eng: “Adopted: stories on transnational and racialized becoming”).
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A. 2011. “‘How Many Sums Can I Do’? Performative Strategies and Diffractive Thinking as Methodological Tools for Rethinking Mathematical Subjectivity.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 1 (1): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. B. 2004. Academic Boundary Work: The Discursive Constitution of ‘Scientificity’ Amongst Researchers Within the Social Sciences and Humanities. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix, A. 2006. “Interrogating Intersectionality: Productive Ways of Theorizing Multiple Positioning.” Kvinder, Køn og Forskning 2–3: 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Plauborg, H. Forthcoming. Intra-actions: Didactics, Sociality, Subject Matter and Learning (Working Title). Aarhus: Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Ratschack, S. H. 1998. Looking White People in the Eyes. Gender, Race and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader, A. 2010. “20 Responding to Pfiesteria piscicida (the Fish Killer): Phantomatic Ontologies, Indeterminacy, and Responsibility in Toxic Microbiology.” Social Studies of Science 40: 275–306. doi: 10.1177/0306312709344902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, A., and J. Bricmont. 1998. Intellectual Impostures. London: Profile Books Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, D. M. 1996. Tegnet på Kroppen. Køn: Koder og Konstruktioner blandt unge Voksne i Akademia. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, D. M. 2002. “Poststructuralist Approaches to Empirical Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 15 (2): 187–204. doi: 10.1080/09518390110111910
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, D. M. 2005. “Making Sense of Gender, Age, Power and Disciplinary Position: Intersecting Discourses in the Academy.” Feminism & Psychology 15 (2): 189–208. doi: 10.1177/0959353505051728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, D. M. 2013. “Virtual Materiality, Potentiality and Subjectivity: How Do We Conceptualize Real-Virtual Interaction Embodied and Enacted in Computer Gaming, Imagination and Night Dreams?” Subjectivity 6 (1): 55–78. doi: 10.1057/sub.2012.23
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D. 2005. “From Culturally Avant-garde to Sexually Promiscuous: Troubling Subjectivities and Intersections in the Social Transition from Childhood into Youth.” Feminism and Psychology 15 (2): 149–167. doi: 10.1177/0959353505051719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D., and M. Juelskjær. Accepted for publication. “Post-psykologisk subjektiveringsteori og ‘problemet med personlighed’ version 2.0 [Post-psychological theory of subjectification and ‘the problem about personality’ version 2.0].” In Personlighedspsykologi, edited by J. Dammeyer and S. Køppe. Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D., and D. M. Søndergaard. 2006. “Intersektionalitet – udsat for teoretisk justering.” Kvinder, Køn og Forskning 2–3: 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Twine, W. F., and C. Gallagher. 2008. “The Future of Whiteness: A Map of the ‘Third Wave’.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 (1): 4–24. doi: 10.1080/01419870701538836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 1990. Schoolgirl Fictions. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. 2006. “Subjectivation and Performative Politics – Butler Thinking Althusser and Foucault: Intelligibility, Agency and the Raced-Nation-Religioned Subjects of Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 27 (4): 511–528. doi: 10.1080/01425690600803160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar