1,045
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Faculty peer networks: role and relevance in advancing agency and gender equity

&
Pages 338-358 | Received 04 Aug 2014, Accepted 06 Mar 2015, Published online: 22 Apr 2015

References

  • Abel, C., and A. Sementelli. 2004. Evolutionary Critical Theory and Its Role in Public Affairs. Armonk, NJ: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Acker, J. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–158.
  • Acker, J. 2006. “Inequality Regimes, Gender, Class and Race in Organizations.” Gender and Society 20 (4): 441–464.
  • Bilimoria, D., Joy, S., and Liang, X. F. 2008. “Breaking Barriers and Creating Inclusiveness: Lessons of Organizational Transformation to Advance Women Faculty in Academic Science and Engineering.” Human Resource Management 47 (3): 423–441.
  • Bilmoria, D., and X. Liang. 2012. Gender Equity in Science and Engineering: Advancing Change in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
  • Bird, S. R. 2011. “Unsettling Universities’ Incongruous, Gendered, Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-Study Approach.” Gender, Work and Organization 18: 202–230.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1985. “The Genesis of the Concepts of Habitus and Field.” Socio-criticism 2 (2): 11–24.
  • Campbell, C. M., and K. O'Meara. 2014. “Faculty Agency: Departmental Contexts that Matter in Faculty Careers.” Research in Higher Education 55 (1): 49–74.
  • Cantor, N. 2011. Gender Equity in the Sciences: Forging a ‘Third Space’. Office of the Chancellor, Paper 42. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University. http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=chancellor.
  • Clark, S. M., and M. Corcoran. 1986. “Perspectives on the Professional Socialization of Women Faculty: A Case of Accumulative Disadvantage?” The Journal of Higher Education 57 (1): 20–43.
  • Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Daly, A. 2010. “Mapping the Terrain: Social Network Theory and Educational Change.” In Social Network Theory, edited by A. Daly, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Dean, D., S. Bracken, and J. Allen, eds. 2009. Women in Academic Leadership: Professional Strategies, Personal Choices. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Fox, M. F. 2008. “Institutional Transformation in the Advancement of Women Faculty: The Case of Academic Science and Engineering.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 23, edited by J. C. Smart, 73–103. New York: Springer.
  • Gaventa, J., and R. Tandon, eds. 2010. Globalizing Citizens: New Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion. London: Zed Books.
  • Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradictions in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Glazer-Raymo, J. 1999. Shattering the Myths: Women in Academe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Glazer-Raymo, J. 2008. “The Feminist Agenda: A Work in Progress.” In Unfinished Agendas: New and Continuing Gender Challenges in Higher Education, edited by J. Glazer-Raymo, 1–34. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Habermas, J. 1992. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Hart, J. 2007. “Creating Networks as an Activist Strategy: Differing Approaches Among Academic Feminist Organizations.” Journal of the Professoriate 2 (1): 33–52.
  • Hart, J. 2008. “Mobilization Among Women Academics: The Interplay Between Feminism and Professionalization.” National Women's Studies Association (NWSA) Journal 20 (1): 184–208.
  • Johnson, R. B., A. J. Onwuegbuzie, and L. A. Turner. 2007. “Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (2): 112–133.
  • Kemelgor, C., and H. Etkowitz. 2001. “Overcoming Isolation: Women's Dilemmas in American Academic Science.” Minerva 39: 239–257.
  • Kezar, A. 2014. “Higher Education Change and Social Networks: A Review of Research.” The Journal of Higher Education 85 (1): 91–124.
  • Kilduff, M., and D. Krackhardt. 2008. Interpersonal Networks in Organizations: Cognition, Personality, Dynamics, and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kiyama, J. M., J. J. Lee, and G. Rhoades. 2012. “A Critical Agency Network Model for Building an Integrated Outreach Program.” The Journal of Higher Education 83 (2): 276–303.
  • Lester, J., M. Sallee, and J. Hart. 2013, May. “Beyond Gendered Universities? Implications for Research on Gender in Organizations.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 2000. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 163–188. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lincoln, A. E., S. Pincus, J. Bandows Koster, and P. S. Leboy. 2014. “The Matilda Effect in Science: Awards and Prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s.” Social Studies of Science 42 (2): 302–320.
  • Marcuse, H. 1970. Five Lectures. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Maxwell, J. A. 2012. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Misra, J., J. H. Lundquist, E. Holmes, and S. Agiomavritis. 2011, January/February. “The Ivory Ceiling of Service Work.” Academe 97 (1): 22–26. http://www.aaup.org/aaup/pubsres/academe/2011/jf/feat/misr.htm.
  • Modern Language Association. 2009. Standing Still: The Associate Professor Survey. New York: MLA. http://www.mla.org/assocprof_survey.
  • Morimoto, S. A., and A. Zajicek. 2012. “Dismantling the ‘Master's House’: Feminist Reflections on Institutional Transformation.” Critical Sociology: 1–16. doi:10.1177/0896920512460063
  • Morimoto, S. A., A. M. Zajicek, V. B. Hunt, and R. Lisnic. 2013. “Beyond Binders Full of Women: NSF ADVANCE and Initiatives for Institutional Transformation.” Sociological Spectrum: Mid-South Sociological Association 33 (5): 397–415. doi:10.1080/02732173.2013.818505
  • National Science Foundation. 2006. ADVANCE: Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5383.
  • Oldenburg, R. 1989. The Great Good Place. New York: Marlowe & Company.
  • Oldenburg, R. 1991. The Great Good Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • O'Meara, K. A. 2015. “A Career with a View: Agentic Perspectives of Women Faculty.” Journal of Higher Education 86 (3): 1–26.
  • O'Meara, K. A., C. M. Campbell, and A. Terosky. 2011, November. “Living Agency in the Academy: A Conceptual Framework for Research and Action.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Charlotte, NC.
  • Putnam, R. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” The Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–78.
  • Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Pyke, K. 2014. “Faculty Gender Inequity and the ‘Just Say No to Service’ Fairytale.” In Disrupting the Culture of Silence: Confronting Gender Inequality and Making Change in Higher Education, edited by Kris De Welde and Andi Stepnick, 83–95. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Rosser, S. V., and J. L. Chameau. 2006. “Institutionalization, Sustainability, and Repeatability of ADVANCE for Institutional Transformation.” Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 335–344.
  • Rossman, G. B., and S. F. Rallis. 2003. Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sallee, M. W. 2013. “Gender Norms and Institutional Culture: The Family-Friendly Versus the Father-Friendly University.” The Journal of Higher Education 84 (3): 363–396.
  • Sallee, M. W. 2011. “Performing Masculinity: Considering Gender in Doctoral Student Socialization.” The Journal of Higher Education 82 (2): 187–216.
  • Smith, J. W., and T. Calasanti. 2005. “The Influences of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity on Workplace Experiences of Institutional and Social Isolation: An Exploratory Study of University Faculty.” Sociological Spectrum 25 (3): 307–334.
  • Stewart, A., D. LaVaque-Manty, and J. Malley. 2004. “Recruiting Female Faculty Members in Science and Engineering: Preliminary Evaluation of One Intervention Model.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 10: 361–375.
  • Sturm, S. 2006. “The Architecture of Inclusion: Advancing Workplace Equity in Higher Education.” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 29 (2): 248–333.
  • Tenkasi, R., and M. Chesmore. 2003. “Social Networks and Planned Change: The Impact of Strong Ties on Effective Change Implementation and Use.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 39 (3): 281–300.
  • Terosky, A. L., K. O'Meara, and C. Campbell. 2014. “Enabling Possibility: Women Associate Professors Sense of Agency in Career Advancement.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7 (1): 58–76.
  • Trower, C. A. 2012. Success on the Tenure Track: Five Keys to Faculty Job Satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Valian, V. 1998. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ward, K., and L. Wolf-Wendel. 2012. Academic Motherhood: How Faculty Manage Work and Family. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • West, M. S., and J. W. Curtis. 2006. AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators 2006. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
  • Winslow, S. 2010. “Gender Inequality and Time Allocations Among Academic Faculty.” Gender & Society 24 (6): 769–793.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.