‘Seeing’ into the past and ‘looking’ forward to the future: visual methods and gender and education research

References

• Allan, A. J. 2006. “Using Photographic Diaries to Research the Gender and Academic Identities of Young Girls.” In Methodological Issues and Practices in Ethnography, edited by G. Walford, B. Jeffrey, and G. Troman, 19–36. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, A. 2009. “The Importance of Being a ‘Lady’: Hyper-Femininity and Heterosexuality in the Private, Single-sex Primary School.” Gender and Education 21 (2): 145–158. doi: 10.1080/09540250802213172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A. 2010. “Picturing Success: Young Femininities and the (Im)possibilities of Academic Achievement in Selective, Single-sex Education.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 20 (1): 39–54. doi: 10.1080/09620211003655630
   Google Scholar
• Allan, A. 2011. “Doing Ethnography and using Visual Methods.” In Research Methods for Youth Practitioners, edited by S. Bradford and F. Cullen, 66–89. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, A. 2012. “Power, Participation and Privilege: Methodological Lessons from a Project with Elite Young People.” Sociological Research Online 17 (3): 8. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/3/8.html. doi: 10.5153/sro.2662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L. 2013. “Girls’ Portraits of Desire: Picturing a Missing Discourse.” Gender and Education 25 (3): 295–310. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.752795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnot, M., and M. Mac anGhaill. 2006. The Routledge Falmer Reader in Gender and Education. Routledge: Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. and S. Delamont. 2008. Gender and Research: Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M. 2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, C. 2013. “Video Diaries: Audio-Visual Research Methods and the Elusive Body.” Visual Studies 28 (1): 29–37. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2013.765203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bhroimeil, U., and D. O'Donoghue. 2009. “Doing Gender History Visually.” In Gender and Power in Irish History, edited by M. Valiulis, 159–182. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaise, M. 2013. “Charting New Territories: Re-Assembling Childhood Sexuality in the Early Years Classroom.” Gender and Education 25 (7): 801–817. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.797070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinn, L., and A. W. Harrist. 1991. “Combining Native Instant Photography and Photo-Elicitation.” Visual Anthropology 4 (2): 175–192. doi: 10.1080/08949468.1991.9966559
   Google Scholar
• Bloustien, G. 2003. Girl Making – A Cross Cultural Ethnography on the Processes of Growing up Female. Oxford: Bergahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bloustien, G., and S. Baker. 2003. “On not Talking to Strangers: Researching the Micro Worlds of Girls through Visual Auto-Ethnographic Practices.” Social Analysis 47 (3): 64–79. doi: 10.3167/015597703782352844
   Google Scholar
• Budgeon, S. 2003. “Identity as an Embodied Event.” Body and Society 9 (1): 35–55. doi: 10.1177/1357034X030091003
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C., and I. Grosvenor. 2007. “The Progressive Image in the History of Education: Stories of Two Schools.” Visual Studies 22 (2): 155–168. doi: 10.1080/14725860701507107
   Google Scholar
• Chaplin, E. 1994. Sociology and Visual Representation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark-Ibanez, M. 2007. “Inner-city Children in Sharper Focus: Sociology of Childhood and Photo Elicitation Interviews.” In Visual Research Methods. Image, Society, and Representation, edited by G. Stanczak, 167–196. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., E. Renold, B. Dicks, B. Soyinka, and B. Mason. 2006. “Hypermedia Ethnography in Educational Settings: Possibilities and Challenges.” Education and Ethnography 1 (1): 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T., and E. Hess. 2007. “What the Camera Sees and from Whose Perspective. Fun Methodologies for Engaging Children in Enlightening Adults.” Childhood 14: 29–45. doi: 10.1177/0907568207068562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croghan, R., C. Griffin, J. Hunter, and A. Phoenix. 2008. “Young People's Constructions of Self: Notes on the Use and Analysis of the Photo-elicitation Methods.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11 (4): 345–356. doi: 10.1080/13645570701605707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debes, J. 1969. “The Loom of Visual Literacy: An Overview.” Audiovisual Instruction 14 (8): 25–7.
   Google Scholar
• Dicks, B., B. Soyinka, and A. Coffey. 2006. “Multi-modal Ethnography.” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 77–96. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058876
   Google Scholar
• Dillabough, J., J. McLeod, and M. Mills, eds. 2009. Troubling Gender in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E., ed. 1992. Anthropology and Photography 1860–1920. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E. 2002. “Material Beings: Objecthood and Ethnographic Photographs.” Visual Studies 17 (1): 67–75. doi: 10.1080/14725860220137336
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E., and J. Hart, eds. 2004. Photographs, Objects, Histories: On the Materiality of Images. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. 1997. “The Promise and Perils of Alternative Forms of Data Representation.” Educational Researcher 26 (6): 4–10. doi: 10.3102/0013189X026006004
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1998. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, J., ed. 2007. Visual Literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischmann, G. E. 2001. “Reflections about Images, Visual Culture and Educational Research.” Educational Researcher 30 (8): 28–33. doi: 10.3102/0013189X030008028
   Google Scholar
• Foster, H. 1987. Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galman, S. 2009. “The Truthful Messenger: Visual Methods and Representation in Qualitative Research in Education.” Qualitative Research 9 (2): 197–217. doi: 10.1177/1468794108099321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotschall, K. 2014. “From the Frozen Wilderness to the Moody Sea: Rural Space, Girlhood and Popular Pedagogy.” Gender and Education 26 (5): 568–583. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2014.944486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosvenor, I. D., and C. Burke. 2007. “The Progressive Image in the History of Education: Stories of Two Schools.” Visual Studies 22 (2): 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Grosvenor, I., M. Lawn, and K. Rousmaniere, eds. 1999. Silences and Images: The Social History of the Classroom. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Grosvenor, I., M. Lawn, and K. Rousmaniere. 2000. “Imaging Past Schooling: The Necessity for Montage.” The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies 22 (1): 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. 1998. “An Argument for Visual Sociology.” In Image-based Research. A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers, edited by J. Prosser, 24–41. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N., and P. Leavy. 2006. Emergent Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. 1981. Family Photographs: Content, Meaning, and Effect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. 1997. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative and Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M., ed. 1999. The Familial Gaze. London: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N., and Hillman, A. 2010. “Power, Agency and Participatory Agendas: A Critical Exploration of Young People's Engagement in Participatory Qualitative Research.” Childhood 17 (3): 360–375. doi: 10.1177/0907568210369310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., and H. L. Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (5): 525–542. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
   Google Scholar
• Ivinson, G., and E. Renold. 2013. “‘Valleys’ Girls: Re-theorising Bodies and Agency in a Semi-rural Post-industrial Locale.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 704–721. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.827372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A.Y., and L. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., T. Vares, and R. Gill. 2013. “The Whole Playboy Mansion Image’: Girls’ Fashioning and Fashioned Selves Within a Postfeminist Culture.” Feminism and Psychology 23 (2): 143–162. doi: 10.1177/0959353511433790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 2002. “That Visual Turn.” Journal of Visual Culture 1 (1): 87–92. doi: 10.1177/147041290200100108
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2010. “Introduction: Conceiving the Intersection of Feminism and Visual Culture, Again.” In The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader, edited by A. Jones, 34–61. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, A. 2002. Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• de Lange, N., and C. Mitchell. 2014. “Building a Future without Gender Violence: Rural Teachers and Youth in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, Leading Community Dialogue.” Gender and Education 26 (5): 584–599. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2014.942257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W. 2003. Pregnant Bodies and Fertile Minds: Gender, Race and the Schooling of Pregnant Teens. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W. 2010. “A Camera is a Big Responsibility’: A Lens for Analysing Children's Visual Voices.” Visual Studies 25 (3): 224–237. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2010.523274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W., and R. Chalfen. 2010. “Lifting Up Voices of Participatory Visual Research.” Visual Studies 25 (3): 197–200. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luvaas, B. 2014. “After Anonymity: Visual Ethics and the Culture of Self-promotion Online.” Accessed January 5, 2015. http://societyforvisualanthropology.org/about/ethics/.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, E. 1999. “Class Pictures: Representations of Race Gender and Ability in a Century of School Photography.” Visual Sociology 14: 7–38. doi: 10.1080/14725869908583800
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., and M. D. Young. 2006. “Gender and Methodology.” In The Sage Handbook of Gender and Education, edited by C. Skelton, B. Francis, and L. Smulyan, 63–78. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, M., and J. Purvis. 1994. Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G. 2002. “Disciplines Contributing to Education? Educational Studies and the Disciplines.” British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (1): 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzeoff, N. 2006. “On Visuality.” Journal of Visual Culture 5 (1): 53–79. doi: 10.1177/1470412906062285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 1984. “What is an Image?” New Literary History 15 (3): 503–537. doi: 10.2307/468718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 2002. “Showing Seeing: a Critique of Visual Culture.” Journal of Visual Culture 1 (2): 165–181. doi: 10.1177/147041290200100202
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 2005. What do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. 2011. Doing Visual Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., and S. Weber. 1999. Reinventing Ourselves as Teachers: Beyond Nostalgia. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moletsane, R., C. Mitchell, N. de Lange, J. Stuart, T. Buthelezi, and M. Taylor. 2009. “What Can a Woman do With a Camera? Turning the Female Gaze on Poverty and HIV and Aids in Rural South Africa.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 22 (3): 315–331. doi: 10.1080/09518390902835454
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, L. 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (3): 6–18. doi: 10.1093/screen/16.3.6
   Google Scholar
• Newbury, D. 2011. “Making Arguments with Images: Visual Scholarship and Academic Publishing.” In The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, edited by E. Margolis and L. Pauwels, 651–664. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, L. 1999. “Collected Visions.” In The Familial Gaze, edited by M. Hirsch, 14–31. London: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1981. “Interviewing Women: AContradiction in Terms?” In Doing Feminist Research, edited by H. Roberts and D. Bell, 30–61. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue, D. 2007. “James Always Hangs Out Here’: Making Space for Place in Studying Masculinities at School.” Visual Studies 22 (1): 62–73. doi: 10.1080/14725860601167218
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. 2011. “An Integrated Conceptual Framework for Visual Social Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, edited by E. Margolis and L. Pauwels, 3–23. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, C. H. 2008. “Anchors of Meaning-helpers of Dialogue: The use of Images in Production of Relations and Meaning.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 21 (1): 35–47. doi: 10.1080/09518390701768781
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S., and J. S. Manion. 2010. “State of the Ethics in Visual Anthropology.” Visual Anthropology Review 26 (2): 96–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-7458.2010.01070.x
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2011. “Sensory Digital Photography: Re-thinking ‘Moving’ and the Image.” Visual Studies 26 (1): 4–13. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2011.548484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper, H., and J. Frankham. 2007. “Seeing Voices and Hearing Pictures: Image as Discourse and the Framing of Image-based Research.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 28 (3): 373–387.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, J., and C. Burke. 2006. “Childlike Perspectives through Image-based Educational Research.” In Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues, edited by J. G. Knowles and A. L. Cole, 407–420. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, J., and A. Loxley. 2010. “The Application of Visual Methodology in the Exploration of the Visual Culture of Schools.” In Educational Research and Inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, edited by, 199–222. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Radley, A. 2010. “What People do with Pictures.” Visual Studies 25 (3): 268–279. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2010.523279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radley, A., and D. Taylor. 2003. “Images of Recovery: A Phot-elicitation Study on the Hospital Ward.” Qualitative Health Research 13: 77–99. doi: 10.1177/1049732302239412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2012. Visual Methodologies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, N. J., E. Renold, S. Holland, and A. Hillman. 2009. “Moving Stories: Using Mobile Methods to Explore the Everyday Lives of Young People in Public Care.” Qualitative Research 9 (5): 605–623. doi: 10.1177/1468794109343629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousmaniere, K. 2001. “Questioning the Visual in the History of Education.” History of Education 30 (2): 109–116. doi: 10.1080/00467600010012391
   Google Scholar
• Skelton, C., B. Francis, and M. Smulyan. 2006. The Sage Handbook of Gender and Education. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Southerland Holt, B. 2012. “Creating Interpretive Visual Texts.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 25 (5): 665–679. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2010.539580
   Google Scholar
• Sparrman, A. 2006. “Film as a Political and Educational Device: Talk about Men, Male Sexuality and Gender Among Swedish Youth.” Visual Studies 21 (2): 167–182. doi: 10.1080/14725860600945010
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J. 1986. Putting Myself in the Picture. London: Camden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J. 1995. Cultural Sniping: The Art of Transgression. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J., and P. Holland, eds. 1991. Family Snaps: The Meanings of Domestic Photography. London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J., and J. Soloman. 1995. What can a Woman do with a Camera? Photography for Women? London: Scarlet Press.
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A., 2013. “Post-Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 629–633. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
   Google Scholar
• Sundaram, V. 2013. “Violence as Understandable, Deserved or Unacceptable? Listening for Gender in Teenagers’ Talk about Violence.” Gender and Education 25 (7): 889–906. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.858110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, H. L., and A. Palmer. 2013. A more ‘Liveable’ School? A Diffractive Analysis of the Performative Enactments of Girls’ Ill-Well-Being with(in) School Environments. Gender and Education 25 (6): 671–687. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.829909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., and G. Ivinson, eds. 2013. Special Issue – Material Feminisms: New Directions for Education. Gender and Education 25: 665–670. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.834617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., ed. 2008. Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P. 2006. Smoke Signals: Women, Smoking and Visual Culture. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P. 2008. “A Fragmented Picture: Reflections on the Photographic Practices of Young People.” Visual Studies 23: 255–266. doi: 10.1080/14725860802489916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P. 2010. ““Picture me as a Young Woman”: Researching Girls’ Photo Collections from the 1950s and 1960s.” Photography and Culture 3 (3): 261–281. doi: 10.2752/175145109X12804957025516
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P. 2011. “‘When I was a Girl … ’:Women Talking about their Girlhood Photo Collections.” In Oral History and Photography, edited by A. Freund and A. Thomson, 45–60. London: Palgrave and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P. 2013. Using Photographs in Social and Historical Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P. 2015. “Teenagers, Photography and Self-fashioning, 1956–1965.” In Consuming Behaviours: Identity, Politics and Pleasure in Twentieth-Century Britain, edited by E. D. Rappaport, S. T. Dawson, and M. J. Crowley, 87–101. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leuwen, T. 2011. “Multimodality and Multi-modal Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, edited by E. Margolis and L. Pauwels, 549–569. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, F. 2002. “A Caring Teacher: Explorations into Primary School Teachers' Professional Identity and Ethic of Care.” Gender and Education 14 (3): 251–264. doi: 10.1080/0954025022000010712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 1991. “Behind the Painted Smile.” In Family Snaps. The Meanings of Domestic Photography, edited by J. Spence and P. Holland, 35–44. London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., H. Lucey, and J. Melody. 2001. Growing up Girl: Psychosocial Explorations of Gender and Class. Buckingham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. 1999. “Photovoice: A Participatory Action Research Strategy Applied to Women's Health.” Journal of Women's Health 8 (2): 185–192.
   Google Scholar