‘Unless you are collaborating with a big name successful professor, you are unlikely to receive funding’

References

• Arini, Collings S., L. Conner, K. McPherson, B. Midson, and C. Wilson. 2010. “Learning to be Leaders in Higher Education: What Helps or Hinders Women's Advancement as Leaders in Universities.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 39 (1): 44–62. doi: 10.1177/1741143210383896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. 2009. “Gender, Academia and the Managerial University.” New Zealand Sociology 24 (1): 24–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bailyn, L. 2003. “Academic Careers and Gender Equity: Lessons Learned from MIT1.” Gender, Work & Organization 10 (2): 137–153. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailyn, L. 2008. “Comment on Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty.” Journal of Women's Health 17 (2): 303–304. doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L., and P. Barrett. 2011. “Women and Academic Workloads: Career Slow Lane or Cul-De-Sac?” Higher Education 61: 141–155. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9329-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M., and I. La Valle. 2000. Who Applies for Research Funding? Key Factors Shaping Funding Application behaviour among Women and Men in British Higher Education Institutions. London: Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J. K., and S. Ulm. 2009. “Grants, Gender and Glass Ceilings?: An Analysis of ARC-Funded Archaeology Projects.” Australian Archaeology 68: 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, A. B. 2014. “Approaches of Women Leaders in Higher Education: Navigating Adversity, Barriers, and Obstacles.” In Women & Leadership in Higher Education, edited by K. A. Longman and S. R. Madsen, 135–152. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly, D., and C. L. A. Pemberton. 2008. “Understanding Barriers and Supports to Proposal Writing as Perceived by Female Associate Professors: Achieving Promotion to Professor.” Research Management Review 16 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. The gender Challenge in Research Funding: Assessing the European National Scenes. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. She Figures 2012: Gender in Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
   Google Scholar
• European Research Council. 2015. ERC Advanced Grants 2014 Outcome: Indicative Statistics. http://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/erc_2014_adg_statistics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. B., S. K. Osganian, S. J. Emans, and F. H., Jr. Lovejoy. 2009. “Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications for Pediatric Residents.” Pediatrics 124 (2): e355–e361. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J., and L. Low. 1997. Women and Peer Review: An Audit of the Wellcome Trust's Decision-Making on Grants. London: Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. M., and V. Elizabeth. 2015. “Unpredictable Feelings: Academic Women Under Research Audit.” British Educational Research Journal 41 (2): 287–302. doi: 10.1002/berj.3145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, J. 2013. “Gender Still on the Agenda.” Times Higher Education. 2 May 2013, 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C., and S. I. Leberman. 2012. “Leadership Development for Women in New Zealand Universities: Learning from the New Zealand Women in Leadership Program.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 14 (1): 28–44. doi: 10.1177/1523422311428747
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, N., and A. Dobele. 2009. “Feathers in the Nest: Establishing a Supportive Environment for Women Researchers.” The Australian Educational Researcher 36 (1): 43–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03216891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosek, S. D., A. G. Cox, B. Ghosh-Dastidar, A. Kofner, N. Ramphal, J. Scott, and S. H. Berry. 2005. “Gender Differences in Major Federal External Grant Programs.” In Technical Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR307.html
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Commission. 2012. New Zealand Census of Women's Participation 2012. Wellington: New Zealand Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jagsi, R., A. R. Motomura, K. A. Griffith, S. Rangarajan, and P. A. Ubel. 2009. “Sex Differences in Attainment of Independent Funding by Career Development Awardees.” Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (11): 804–W268. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldal, S.-E., J. Rindfleish, and A. Sheridan. 2005. “Deal-Making and Rule-Breaking: Behind the Facade of Equity in Academia.” Gender and Education 17 (4): 431–447. doi: 10.1080/09540250500145130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., E. Vignola-Gagné, C. Villeneuve, P. Gélinas, and Y. Gingras. 2011. “Sex Differences in Research Funding, Productivity and Impact: An Analysis of Québec University Professors.” Scientometrics 87 (3): 483–498. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 2000. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research 2nd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 162–188. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, J., and S. Jülich. 2006. “Researching Women at Auckland University of Technology.” Critical Perspectives on Communication, Cultural & Policy Studies 25 (1): 17–58.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thoudand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. 2005. “Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Conseling Psychology.” The Journal of Counseling Psychology 52: 250–260. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, N., M. Tremaine, and S. Fountaine. 2012. “Breaking through the Glass Ceiling in the Ivory Tower: Using a Case Study to Gain New Understandings of Old Gender Issues.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 14 (2): 221–236. doi: 10.1177/1523422312436418
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, R., L. Bornmann, and H.-D. Daniel. 2012. “Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review? An Empirical Investigation using the Example of the Austrian Science Fund.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 220 (2): 121–129. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J. 2010. “Women at the Top.” Forum on Public Policy (Summer) 5.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, J., and K. White. 2014. “Australasian University Management, Gender and Life Course Issues.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 33 (4): 384–395. doi: 10.1108/EDI-05-2013-0024
   Google Scholar
• NIH. 2013. NIH Data Book. Accessed September 6, 2013. http://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Peiró-Pérez, R., C. Colomer-Revuelta, M. Blázquez-Herranz, and F. Gómez- López. 2007. “Applications Submitted and Grants Awarded to Men and Women in Nationwide Biomedical Competitive Research, in 2006, in Spain. [Article].” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 61: ii17–ii19. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.067413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohlhaus, J. R., H. Jiang, R. M. Wagner, W. T. Schaffer, and V. W. Pinn. 2011. “Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs.” Academic Medicine 86 (6): 759–767. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821836ff.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probert, B. 2005. “‘I Just Couldn't Fit it in’: Gender and Unequal Outcomes in Academic Careers. [Article].” Gender, Work & Organization 12 (1): 50–72. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00262.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, K., and R. Luthra. 2011. “Are Research Grants Free from Gender Bias: An Overview of Funding Pattern of CSIR Extramural Research Projects in Life Sciences. [Article].” Current Science (00113891) 100 (1): 38–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, W. J. 2012. “Critiquing Canada's Research Culture: Social, Cultural, and Political Restraints on Women's University Careers.” Forum on Public Policy Online (2).
   Google Scholar
• Seng, J. S. 1998. “Praxis as a Conceptual Framework for Participatory Research in Nursing.” Advances in Nursing Science 20 (4): 37–48. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199806000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tessens, L., K. White, and C. Web. 2011. “Senior Women in Higher Education Institutions: Perceived Development Needs and Support.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33 (6): 653–665. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2011.621191
   Google Scholar
• Tuhiwai-Smith, L. 1997. “Decolonising Intellectual Identity: Māori/Woman/Academic.” In Cultural Politics and the University in Aotearoa/New Zealand, edited by M. Peters, 182–210. Chapter 7. Wellington, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2010. The World's Women 2010: Trends and Statistics. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 1990. Researching the Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbren, S. E., H. Bowles, T. Hasan, K. H. Zou, J. Emans, C. Goldberg, H. Christou, et al. 2008. “Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty.” Journal of Women's Health 17 (2): 207–214. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenneras, C., and A. Wold. 1997. “Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review.” Nature 387 (6631): 341–343. doi: 10.1038/387341a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar