Doing academic writing differently: a feminist bricolage

References

• Acker, S., and D. Piper, eds. 1984. Is Higher Education Fair to Women? Surrey: Society for Research in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. 2001. “Moving on (Part 2): Power and the Child in Curriculum History.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 33 (3): 277–302.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.” Derrida Today 3 (2): 240–268. doi: 10.3366/drt.2010.0206
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-apart.” Parallax 20 (3): 168–187. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Ronald J., and Richard Quinney. 2005. Storytelling Sociology: Narrative as Social Inquiry. Colorado: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Bhavnani. 1993. “Tracing the Contours: Feminist Research and Feminist Objectivity.” Women's Studies International Forum 16 (2): 95–104. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(93)90001-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1988. “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory.” Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–531. doi: 10.2307/3207893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlayne, P., J. Bornat, and T. Wengraf, eds. 2002. The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative Issues and Examples. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cixous, H. 1976. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1 (4): 875–893. doi: 10.1086/493306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, M. 1978. Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. London: The Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and S. Gannon. 2012. “Collective Biography and the Entangled Enlivening of Being.” International Review of Qualitative Research 5: 357–376.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2005. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, K., and J. Wyatt. 2010. Between the Two: A Nomadic Inquiry into the Collaborative Writing and Subjectivity. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, H. Lloyd. 2008. Writing Qualitative Inquiry: Self, Stories, and Academic Life. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. 2007. “What is a Feminist Theorist Responsible For? Response to Rachel Torr.” Feminist Theory 8 (1): 69–76. doi: 10.1177/1464700106069042
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. 2003. “Rhizovocality.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (5): 693–710. doi: 10.1080/0951839032000142968
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. 2001. “Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 679–692. doi: 10.1177/107780040100700601
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 2007. Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts Toward a Double(d) Science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., and C. Smithies. 1997. Troubling the Angels: Women Living with HIV/AIDS. Colorado: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maclure, M. 2013. “Classification or Wonder? Coding as an Analytic Practice in Qualitative Research.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 164–183. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. 2014. “Beyond an Easy Sense: A Diffractive Analysis.” Qualitative Inquiry 20: 742–746. doi: 10.1177/1077800414530257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L., and A. Y. Jackson. 2012. “Complicating Voice in a Refusal to ‘Let Participants Speak for Themselves’.” Qualitative Inquiry 18 (9): 745–751. doi: 10.1177/1077800412453017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minh-ha, T. T. 1989. Woman, Native, Other: Writing, Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, Anne. 1981. Interviewing Women: A Contradiction In Terms, In Seale, Clive, Social Research Methods: A Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. 2010. The Subversive Stitch. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Perriton, L. 1999. “The Provocative and Evocative Gaze upon Women in Management Development.” Gender and Education 11 (3): 295–307. doi: 10.1080/09540259920591
   Google Scholar
• Ramazanoglu, C., and J. Holland. 2002. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. 1994. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 516–529. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. 2009. “All Manner of Becomings: Identity, Power and the Spaces of Knowledge Production in a Level Student Research.” Unpublished DPhil thesis. University of Sussex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. 2011. “‘Hope in Failure’: A Level Students, Discursive Agency, Post-feminism and Feminism.” Gender and Education 23 (7): 825–841. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2010.538013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. 2013. “Objects, Bodies and Space: Gender and Embodied Practices of Mattering in the Classroom.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 688–703. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.834864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Tuin, I. 2014. “Diffraction as a Methodology for Feminist Onto-epistemology: On Encountering Chantal Chawaf and Posthuman Interpellation.” Parallax 20 (3): 231–244. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Tuin, I., and R. Dolphijn. 2010. “The Transversality of New Materialism.” Women: A Cultural Review 21 (2): 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Yar, M. 2003. “Panoptic Power and the Pathologisation of Vision: Critical Reflections on the Foucauldian Thesis.” Surveillance and Society 1 (3): 254–271.
   Google Scholar