Worthwhile work? Childcare, feminist ethics and cooperative research practices

References

• Acker, Sandra, and Jo-Anne Dillabough. 2007. “Women ‘Learning to Labour’ in the ‘Male Emporium’: Exploring Gendered Work in Teacher Education.” Gender and Education 19 (3): 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agar, Michael. 1999. “How to Ask for a Study in Qualitatisch.” Qualitative Health Research 9 (5): 684–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, Yarrow, Maeve O'Brien, Jayne Osgood, Lara Corr, Connie Lent, and Margaret Boyd. 2015. “ Uncertain Negotiations: Developing the Methodology of a Cross-disciplinary, Multi-method, Transnational Approach to Studying the Value of Early Childhood Education and Care Work.” Paper presented at the Gender and Education Association Conference, Roehampton, London, 25 June.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, John. 2013. “Connections Between Early Childhood Education and Care and Primary Schooling: Research and Policy Observations from more than 20 Countries.” In Building a Strong and Equal Partnership Between Early Childhood and School Education Conference. Hong Kong Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan, and Robert G. Burgess. 1994. “Reflections on Qualitative Data Analysis.” In Analysing Qualitative Data, edited by Alan Bryman and Robert G. Burgess, 216–226. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cancian, Francesca. 1992. “Feminist Science: Methodologies That Challenge Inequality.” Gender & Society 6 (4): 623–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Luis, and Estela Costa. 2015. “Seeing Education with One’s Own Eyes and Through PISA Lenses: Considerations of the Reception of PISA in European Countries.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (5): 638–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVault, Marjorie, and Glenda Gross. 2012. “Feminist Qualitative Interviewing: Experience, Talk and Knowledge.” In Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis, edited by Sharlene Hesse-Biber, 206–237. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriades, Greg. 2015. “The Pedagogical Turn: QI at 20 Years.” Qualitative Inquiry 21 (7): 591–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfer, Peter. 2013. “Emotional Aspects of Nursery Policy and Practice - Progress and Prospect.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 23 (4): 497–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, Caroline, and Sharlene Mollett. 2014. “Critical Feminist Reflexivity and the Politics of Whiteness in the ‘Field’.” Gender, Place & Culture 23 (1): 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, Michelle. 1992. Disruptive Voices: The Possibilities of Feminist Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2015. “Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin.” Environmental Humanities 6: 159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, Patricia. 2000. “What’s Going On? Black Feminist Thought and the Politics of Postmodernism.” In Working the Ruins: Feminist Poststructuralist Theory and Methods in Education, edited by Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre and Wanda Pillow, 41–73. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Christina, and Celia Lury. 2013. “Re-turning Feminist Methodologies: From a Social to an Ecological Epistemology.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 786–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Alecia, and Lisa Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data across Multiple Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, John. 2014. “Scholarly Innovation for Difficult Times.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (9): 1119–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka, David Carlson, Marek Tesar, and Kate Anderson. 2015. “Methodology Brut: Philosophy, Ecstatic Thinking, and Some Other (Unfinished) Things.” Qualitative Inquiry 21 (7): 612–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, Patti. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, Patti, and Elizabeth St. Pierre. 2013. “Post-qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 629–633.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, Connie. 2015. Regulation of Family Day Care: A Qualitative Study of Family Child Care Provider’s experience. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz-Taguchi, Hillevi. 2013. “Images of Thinking in Feminist Materialisms: Ontological Divergences and the Production of Researcher Subjectivities.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 706–716.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, Mary. 2008. “Methods, Practice and Epistemology: The Debate about Feminism and Research.” In Gender and Research, edited by Sara Delamont and Paul Atkinson, 71–90. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, Lisa. 2016. “Voice Without a Subject.” Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies 16 (2): 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, Paddy. 2015. Subjectivity, Gender and the Struggle for Recognition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell, Rebecca. 2011. “Paperwork, Rotas, Words and Posters: an Anthropological Account of Some Inner London Childminders’ Encounters with Professionalisation.” The Sociological Review 59 (4): 779–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, Mike. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production.” Disability, Handicap and Society 7 (2): 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, Jayne. 2016. Narratives from the Nursery: Negotiating Professional Identities in Early Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen, Tuija. 2015. “Identity and Intervention: Disciplinarity as Transdisciplinarity in Gender Studies.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (5-6): 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandford, Stella. 2015. “Contradiction of Terms: Feminist Theory, Philosophy and Transdisciplinarity.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (5): 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, Andrew. 2005. The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyer, Inge, and Martin Krause. 2016. “Pedagogical Staff in Children’s Day Care Centres in Germany: Links Between Working Conditions, Job Satisfaction, Commitment and Work-related Stress.” Early Years 36 (2): 132–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Johannes. 2015. “The ERI model – stress and health.” Universitatsklinikum Dusseldorf, Accessed January 15. http://www.uniklinik-duesseldorf.de/startseite/institute/institut-fuer-medizinische-soziologie/forschung-research/the-eri-model-stress-and-health/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 2013. “The Posts Continue: Becoming.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 646–657.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. 2012. “Configuration.” In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford, 48–60. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Gary, and David James. 2006. “Re-inventing Grounded Theory: Some Questions about Theory, Ground and Discovery.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (6): 767–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Stefan, and Iddo Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30 (3): 167–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar