Smart girls traversing assemblages of gender and class in Australian secondary mathematics classrooms

References

• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, Spacetime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.” Derrida Today 3 (2): 240–268. doi: 10.3366/drt.2010.0206
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2012. “Nature’s Queer Performativity.” Kvinder, Køn & Forskning NR 1–2: 25–53.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-apart.” Parallax 20 (3): 168–187. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington, F., and M. Evans. 2014. Participation in Year 12 Mathematics 2004–2013. Melbourne: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2005. “A Critical Cartography of Feminist Post-postmodernism.” Australian Feminist Studies 20 (47): 169–180. doi: 10.1080/08164640500090319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandell, G., and E.-M. Staberg. 2008. “Mathematics: A Female, Male or Gender-neutral Domain? A Study of Attitudes Among Students at Secondary Level.” Gender and Education 20 (5): 495–509. doi: 10.1080/09540250701805771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J. 2015. “Re/imagining Higher Education Pedagogies: Gender, Emotion and Difference.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (4): 388–401. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1020782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschor, C. B., C. Kappler, A. K. Frei, and S. Berweger. 2014. “I Want to Be a Scientist/a Teacher: Students’ Perceptions of Career Decision-making in Gender-typed, Non-traditional Areas of Work.” Gender and Education 26 (7): 743–758. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2014.970615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L. M., and Costa, E. 2015. “Seeing Education with One's Own Eyes and through PISA Lenses: Considerations of the Reception of PISA in European Countries.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (5): 638–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C., J. Kenway, and J. McLeod. 2000. Factors Influencing the Educational Performance of Males and Females in School and Their Initial Destinations after Leaving School. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2006a. “Subjectification: The Relevance of Butler’s Analysis for Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 27 (4): 425–438. doi: 10.1080/01425690600802907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2006b. “Identity, Abjection and Otherness: Creating the Self, Creating Difference.” In The Routledge Falmer Reader in Gender and Education, edited by M. Arnot and M. M. A. Ghaill, 72–90. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doidge, N. 2007. The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, K., and K. Wiltshire. 2014. Review of the Australian Curriculum: Final Report. 1–288. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Falkiner, A. 2012. National Trends in Year 12 Course Completions, Policy Note. 6 vols, 1–10. Canberra: Australian Demography and Social Research Institute, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, C. 2010. Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences. London: Icon.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B., and C. Skelton. 2008. “‘The Self-made’: Analysing the Potential Contribution to the Field of Gender and Education of Theories that Disembed Selfhood.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29 (3): 311–323.
   Google Scholar
• Fullarton, S., and J. Ainley. 2000. “Subject Choice by Students in Year 12 in Australian Secondary Schools.” LSAY Research Reports; Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth Research Report (Vol. 15). Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, T., M. Bieg, O. Ludtke, R. Pekrun, and N. Hall. 2013. “Do Girls Really Experience More Anxiety in Mathematics?” Psychological Science 24 (10): 2079–2087. doi: 10.1177/0956797613486989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, V. 2013. “Privilege, Agency and Affect in the Academy: Who Do You Think You Are.” In Privilege, Agency and Affect, edited by C. Maxwell and P. Aggleton, 106–123. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., T. Lyons, and F. Quinn. 2014. “The Continuing Decline of Science and Mathematics Enrolments in Australian High Schools.” Teaching Science 60 (2): 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, V., and E. Sand. 2015. “On the Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases.” NBER Working Paper Series (1–42). Cambridge, MA 02138: University of Warwick, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv University.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C., and V. Hey. 2009. “Gender/ed Discourses and Emotional Sub-texts: Theorising Emotion in UK Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (4): 429–440. doi:10.1080/13562510903050194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, S. T., J. P. Robinson, C. C. Crane, and C. M. Ganley. 2013. “Girls’ and Boys’ Mathematics Achievement, Affect, and Experiences: Findings from ECLS-K.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 44 (4): 634–645. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mendick, H. 2005. “A Beautiful Myth? The Gendering of Being/Doing‘Good at Maths’.” Gender and Education 17 (2): 203–219. doi: 10.1080/0954025042000301465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs. 2008. “Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs, Melbourne.” Curriculum Corporation. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A. 2008. “‘I’m not a “Maths-person”!’ Reconstituting Mathematical Subjectivities in Aesthetic Teaching Practice.” Gender and Education 21 (4): 387–404. doi: 10.1080/09540250802467950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts-Taylor, V. 2016. The Brain’s Body: Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlivan, K. 2014. “De-centering Researcher Affect: Producing the ‘Getting It Right’ Assemblage in a School Based Sexuality Education Research Project.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Meeting, Philadelphia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., and J. Ringrose. 2008. “Regulation and Rupture.” Feminist Theory 9 (3): 313–338. doi: 10.1177/1464700108095854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J. 2012. Postfeminist Education: Girls and the Sexual Politics of Schooling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J. 2015. “Schizo-feminist Educational Research Cartographies.” Deleuze Studies 9 (3): 393–409. doi:10.3366/dls.2015.0194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Y., D. Lawson, and T. Croft. 2011. “Dealing with ‘Fragile Identities’: Resistance and Refiguring in Women Mathematics Students.” Gender and Education 23 (5): 565–583. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2010.512270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. D. 1994. “The Ethics.” In A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works, edited by E. M. Curley, xxxv, 280. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2013. “The Appearance of Data.” Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies 13 (4): 223–227.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., and Buckley, S. (2013). PISA 2012: How Australia Measures Up, i–390. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. 1995. “Shame and Its Sisters.” In Shame and its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader, edited by E. K. Sedgwick and A. Frank, 268. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 1998. Counting Girls Out: Girls and Mathematics. New ed. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 2006. “Femininity as Performance.” Oxford Review of Education 15 (3): 267–279. doi: 10.1080/0305498890150307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M. 2006. “The Leaky Mathematics Pipeline for Girls: A Motivational Analysis of High School Enrolments in Australia and the USA.” Equal Opportunities International 25 (8): 642–659. doi: 10.1108/02610150610719119
   Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M., J. D. Shapka, Z. A. Morris, A. M. Durik, D. P. Keating, and J. S. Eccles. 2012. “Gendered Motivational Processes Affecting High School Mathematics Participation, Educational Aspirations, and Career Plans: A Comparison of Samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States.” Developmental Psychology 48 (6): 1594–1611. doi: 10.1037/a0027838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. J. 2016. “Refracting Schoolgirls: Pedagogical Intra-actions Producing Shame.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2016.1143451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. 2006. “Sex-gender-sexuality: How Sex, Gender and Sexuality Constellations are Constituted in Secondary Schools.” Gender and Education 17 (3): 249–270. doi: 10.1080/09540250500145148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar