Wolf cries: on power, emotions and critical literacy in first-language teaching in Sweden

References

• Åberg, M. 2008. Lärardrömmar: Om makt, mångfald och konstruktioner av lärarsubjekt [Teacher Dreams: On Power, Diversity and Construction of Teacher Subjectivities]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Åberg, M., and M. Hedlin. 2015. “Happy Objects, Happy Men? Affect and Materiality in Vocational Training.” Gender and Education 27 (3): 523–538. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1069797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2004a. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2004b. “Affective Economies.” Social Text 22 (2): 117–139. doi: 10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anwaruddin, S. M. 2015. “Why Critical Literacy Should Turn to ‘The Affective Turn’: Making a Case for Critical Affective Literacy.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1042429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholdsson, Å. 2007. Med facit i hand: Normalitet, elevskap och vänlig maktutövning i två svenska skolor [With the Benefit of Hindsight: Normality, Being a Pupil and Friendly Exercise of Power in Two Swedish Schools]. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D. 2007. Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, M. 2011. “Hjälp oss att bli av med vargen” [Help us Get Rid of the Wolf]. Aftonbladet, Accessed December 25. https://www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/article14117653.ab.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. 1997. “Disciplined Emotions: Philosophies of Educated Feelings.” Educational Theory 47 (2): 203–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1997.00203.x
   Google Scholar
• Brady, J. 1994. “Critical Literacy, Feminism, and a Politics of Representation.” In Politics of Liberation: Paths from Freire, edited by P. L. McLaren and C. Lankshear, 142–153. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bränström Öhman, A., M. Jönsson, and I. Svensson. 2011. Att känna sig fram: Känslor i humanistisk genusforskning [Feeling Our Way: Emotions in Humanities Gender Research]. Umeå: h:ström – Text & kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 1994. “Being Dismissed: The Politics of Emotional Expression.” Hypatia 9 (3): 46–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00449.x
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. 2011. “Values, Virtues and Professional Development in Education and Teaching.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (2011): 171–176.
   Google Scholar
• Chambliss, M. 1994. “Why Do Readers Fail to Change Their Beliefs after Reading Persuasive Text?.” In Beliefs about Text and Instruction With Text, edited by R. P. A. Garner and A. Alexander, 75–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chambliss, M. 1995. “Text Cues and Strategies Successful Readers Use to Construct the Gist of Lengthy Written Arguments.” Reading Research Quarterly 30 (4): 778–807. doi: 10.2307/748198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colnerud, G., and R. Thornberg. 2003. Värdepedagogik i internationell belysning [Values Pedagogy in an International Perspective]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1996. “Teaching the Boys: New Research on Masculinity, and Gender Strategies for Schools.” Teachers College Record 98 (2): 206–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 2005. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2009. Om genus [On Gender]. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M., and K. Rake. 2003. Gender and the Welfare State: Care, Work and Welfare in Europe and the USA. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 1997. “Constructing and Deconstructing Masculinities through Critical Literacy.” Gender and Education 9 (1): 9–30. doi: 10.1080/09540259721420
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2008. The Uses of Literature. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Giota, J. 2001. Adolescents’ Perceptions of School and Reasons for Learning. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Haria, P., C. MacArthur, and L. Edwards Santoro. 2010. “The Effects of Teaching a Text-structure Based Reading Comprehension Strategy on Struggling Fifth Grade Students’ Ability to Summarize and Analyze Written Arguments.” Paper presented at the SREE Conference, Research into Practice, Washington, DC, March 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551–575. doi: 10.1086/227049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, S. E., C. B. Block, K. L. Bauserman, and K. Kinnucan-Welsch. 2005. Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. 2010. Literacy and Power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H., K. Dixon, A. Ferreira, S. Granville, and D. Newfield. 2014. Doing Critical Literacy: Texts and Activities for Students and Teachers. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. 2013. “‘OK This Is Hard’: Doing Emotions in Social Justice Dialogue.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 8 (1): 29–42. doi: 10.1177/1746197912448714
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. 2011. Envisioning Literature: Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M., M. A. Britt, and A. A. Larson. 2004. “Disfluencies in Comprehending Argumentative Texts.” Reading Psychology 25: 205–224. doi: 10.1080/02702710490489908
   Google Scholar
• Lipman-Blumen, J. 1976. “Toward a Homosocial Theory of Sex Roles: An Explanation of the Sex Segregation of Social Institutions.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1 (3): 15–31. doi: 10.1086/493272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovat, T. 2011. “Values Education and Holistic Learning: Updated Research Perspectives.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (2011): 148–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2011.07.009
   Google Scholar
• Newell, G. E., R. Beach, J. Smith, and J. VanDerHeide. 2011. “Teaching and Learning Argumentative Reading and Writing: A Review of Research.” Reading Research Quarterly 46 (3): 273–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., A. Gamoran, R. Kachur, and C. Prendergast. 1997. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olin-Scheller, C., and M. Tengberg. 2016. Läsa mellan raderna [Reading between the Lines]. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, G. A., and L. Worsham. 1998. “Staging the Politics of Difference: Homi Bhabha’s Critical Literacy.” JAC 18 (3): 361–391.
   Google Scholar
• Regeringen. 2015. “Regeringen gör insatser för en hållbar vargpolitik [The Government’s Proposal for a Sustainable Wolf Politics].” http://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2015/04/regeringen-gor-insatser-for-en-hallbar-vargpolitik/.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2014. “Synliggör maktrelationer och motiverar [Critical Literacy Highlights Power Relations and Motivates].” http://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/forskning/didaktik/undervisning/critical-literacy-synliggor-maktrelationer-och-motiverar-1.217266.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tengberg, M., C. Olin-Scheller, and A. Lindholm. 2015. “Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension through a Multiple Strategy Approach. Effects of Dialogic Strategy Instruction in Secondary School.” L1. Educational Research in Language and Literature 15: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. 1991. “Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet.” Social Text 29: 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., and E. H. Son. 2011. “A Dialogic Turn in Research on Learning and Teaching to Comprehend.” In Handbook of Reading Research, vol. 4, edited by M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, and P. Afflerbach, 359–338. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2014. “Theorizing ‘Difficult Knowledge’ in the Aftermath of the ‘Affective Turn’: Implications for Curriculum and Pedagogy in Handling Traumatic Representations.” Curriculum Inquiry 44: 390–412. doi:10.1111/curi.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar