Exploring the possibilities of gender equality pedagogy in an era of marketization

References

• Antikainen, A. 2006. “In Search of the Nordic Model in Education.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50 (3): 229–243. doi:10.1080/00313830600743258.
   Google Scholar
• Anttonen, A. 2002. “Universalism and Social Policy: A Nordic-Feminist Revaluation.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 10 (2): 71–80. doi: 10.1080/080387402760262168
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, A. 1998. “A Passionate Subject: Representations of Desire in Feminist Pedagogy.” Gender and Education 10 (1): 85–92. doi: 10.1080/09540259821113
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. 1995. “Is There a Queer Pedagogy? Or, Stop Reading Straight.” Educational Theory 45 (2): 151–165. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1995.00151.x.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, T. L., and L. Potts. 2001. “Dissonant Voices: The Teacher’s ‘Personal’ in Women’s Studies.” Gender and Education 13 (4): 373–385. doi:10.1080/09540250120081733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunila, K. 2009. Parasta ennen. Tasa-arvotyön projektitapaistuminen [ Best Before. The Projectisation of Gender Equality Work]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Brunila, K. 2010. Sukupuolten tasa-arvo korkeakoulutuksessa ja tutkimuksessa [ Gender Equality in Higher Education and Research]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Brunila, K. 2013. “Persuasions, Resistances and Other Discourse Virtuoses. The Ambivalent Position of Equality Specialist in Education.” GENEROS – Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies 2 (1): 404–425.
   Google Scholar
• Brunila, K., and C. Edström. 2013. “The Famous Nordic Equality. What’s Nordic About It?” Nordic Studies in Education 33 (4): 300–313.
   Google Scholar
• Brunila, K., M. Heikkinen, and P. Hynninen. 2005. Difficult but Doable. Good Practices for Equality Work. Kajaani: Oulu University, Kajaani University Consortium, Adult Education Unit/The National Thematic Network.
   Google Scholar
• Brunila, K., and H. Ylöstalo. 2015. “Challenging Gender Inequalities in Education and in Working Life – A Mission Possible?” Journal of Education and Work 28 (5): 443–460. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2013.806788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2008. “An Account of Oneself.” In Judith Butler in Conversation. Analyzing the Texts and Talk of Everyday Life, edited by B. Davies, 300–313. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 1998. A Body of Writing 1990–1999. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2005. “The (Im)Possibility of Intellectual Work in Neoliberal Regimes.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 26 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/01596300500039310.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., J. Browne, S. Gannon, E. Homan, C. Laws, B. Muller-Rockstroh, and E. B. Petersen. 2006. “The Ambivalent Practices of Reflexivity.” In Doing Collective Biography, edited by B. Davies and S. Gannon, 88–113. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., S. Dormer, S. Gannon, C. Laws, S. Rocco, H. L. Taguchi, and H. McCann. 2001. “Becoming Schoolgirls: The Ambivalent Project of Subjectification.” Gender and Education 13 (2): 167–182. doi:10.1080/09540250124848.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline & Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by M. Bergman Ramos. New York: Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A., and P. McLaren. 2001. Kriittinen pedagogiikka [ Critical Pedagogy]. Edited by T. Aittola and J. Suoranta. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J. 1993. The Struggle for Pedagogies. Critical and Feminist Discourses as Regimes of Truth. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, T., K. Otonkorpi-Lehtoranta, M. Leinonen, and H. Ylöstalo. 2015. “Gender Issues on Change Agenda – Practising Intersectionality in Action Research.” Gender, Work and Organization, doi:10.1111/gwao.12072.
   Google Scholar
• Holli, A. M. 2003. Discourse and Politics for Gender Equality in Late Twentieth Century Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. 1994. Teaching to Transgress. Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ikävalko, E. 2013. “Tasa-arvotaitoja työelämään? Opiskelijat ja oppilaitosten toiminnallinen tasa-arvosuunnittelu.” [ Gender Equality Skills for Working Life? Students and Gender Equality Planning in Education.] In Ammatillinen koulutus ja yhteiskunnalliset eronteot [ Vocational Education and Societal Differences], edited by K. Brunila, K. Hakala, E. Lahelma, and A. Teittinen, 63–86. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Ikävalko, E. 2016. Vaikenemisia ja vastarintaa: valtasuhteet ja toiminnan mahdollisuudet oppilaitosten tasa-arvosuunnittelussa [ Power Relations and Possibilities of Agency in Gender Equality Planning in Educational Institutions]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Ikävalko, E., and K. Brunila. 2011. “Tasa-arvosuunnittelu managerialistisen hallinnan tekniikkana.” [ Equality Planning as a Technique of Managerialist Governing.] Sosiologia 48 (4): 323–337.
   Google Scholar
• Julkunen, R. 2010. Sukupuolen järjestykset ja tasa-arvon paradoksit [ Gender Orders and Paradoxes of Gender]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Juvonen, T. 2006. “Kohti pervopedagogiikkaa. Lesbo- ja queertutkimuksen opettaminen haasteena yliopistopedagogiikalle.” [ Towards a Queer Pedagogy. Teaching Lesbian and Queer Studies as a Challenge to University Pedagogy.] Naistutkimus–Kvinnoforskning 19 (4): 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, J. 2010. “Shifting Institutional and Ideational Terrains: The Impact of Europeanisation and Neoliberalism on Women's Policy Agencies.” Policy & Politics 38 (3): 353–368. doi:10.1332/030557310X521053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., and J. Squires. 2012. “From State Feminism to Market Feminism?” International Political Science Review 33 (4): 382–400. doi: 10.1177/0192512111432513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiianmaa, N. 2012. Tasa-arvobarometri 2012 [ The Gender Equality Barometer in Finland]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, C., and B. Davies. 2000. “Poststructuralist Theory in Practice: Working with “Behaviourally Disturbed” Children.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 13 (3): 205–221. doi:10.1080/09518390050019631.
   Google Scholar
• Liesner, A. 2006. “Education or Service? Remarks on Teaching and Learning in the Entrepreneurial University.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4): 483–495. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00206.x.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, C. 1996. “Feminist Pedagogy Theory: Reflections on Power and Authority.” Educational Theory 46 (3): 283–302. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1996.00283.x.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. 2010. “Qualitative Inquiry: Where Are the Ruins?” Keynote presentation to the New Zealand Association for Research in Education Conference, University of Auckland, December 6–9. http://www.esri.mmu.ac.uk/respapers/nzareRuins.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Magnet, S., and S. Diamond. 2010. “Feminist Pedagogy Meets Feminist Therapy: Teaching Feminist Therapy in Women’s Studies.” Feminist Teacher 21 (1): 21–35. doi:10.5406/femteacher.21.1.0021.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, M. 1998. “Reproductive and Resistant Pedagogies: The Comparative Roles of Collaborative Learning and Feminist Pedagogy in Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 (4): 443–459. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4&lt;443::AID-TEA14&gt;3.0.CO;2-A doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4<443::AID-TEA14>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R. 2008. “Building or Eroding Intellectual Capital? Student Consumerism as a Cultural Force in the Context of Knowledge Economy.” In Cultural Perspectives on Higher Education, edited by J. Välimaa and O.-H. Ylijoki, 43–55. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Naskali, P. 2010. “Yliopisto-opetus vaihdon ja lahjan taloudessa.” [ University Teaching in the Economy of Gift and Exchange.] In Yrittäjyyskasvatus hallintana [ Entrepreneurial Education as a Form of Governing], edited by K. Komulainen, S. Keskitalo-Foley, M. Korhonen, and S. Lappalainen, 251–268. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. 2008. “Passionately Attached: Academic Subjects of Desire.” In Judith Butler in Conversation. Analyzing the Texts and Talk of Everyday Life, edited by B. Davies, 55–67. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prügl, E. 2011. “Diversity Management and Gender Mainstreaming as Technologies of Government.” Politics & Gender 7 (1): 71–89. doi:10.1017/S1743923X10000565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen, T. 2003. Postmoderni politiikan filosofia [ Postmodern Politics of Philosophy]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Raevaara, E. 2005. Tasa-arvo ja muutoksen rajat. Sukupuolten tasa-arvo poliittisena ongelmana Ranskan parité- ja Suomen kiintiökeskusteluissa [ Equality and the Limitations of Change]. The Council for Gender Equality, Publications 7. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Saarinen, J. 2001. “Riitasointuja – valta ja auktoriteetti feministisessä pedagogiikassa.” [ Power and Authority in Feminist Pedagogy.] Aikuiskasvatus 21 (4): 330–335.
   Google Scholar
• Saarinen, J., H. Ojala, and T. Palmu. 2014. “Mikä ihmeen feministinen pedagogiikka?” [ What is Feminist Pedagogy?] In Eroja ja vaarallisia suhteita. Keskustelua feministisestä pedagogiikasta [ Discussion About feminist pedagogy], edited by J. Saarinen, H. Ojala, and T. Palmu, 17–40. Jyväskylä: Suomen Kasvatustieteellinen Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Skjeie, H., and M. Teigen. 2005. “Political Costructions of Gender Equality: Travelling Towards … a Gender Balanced Society?” Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 187–197. doi: 10.1080/08038740600590004
   Google Scholar
• Squires, J. 2007. The New Politics of Gender Equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2000. “Poststructural Feminism in Education: An Overview.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 13 (5): 477–515. doi:10.1080/09518390050156422.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdell, E. J. 1998. “Poststructural Feminist Pedagogies: The Possibilities and Limitations of Feminist Emancipatory Adult Learning Theory and Practice.” Adult Education Quarterly 48 (3): 139–156. doi:10.1177/074171369804800302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vänskä, A. 2011. ““Queer+pedagogia=mahdoton yhtälö?” [Queer+Pedagogy=Impossible Equation?].” Kasvatus 42 (5): 455–467.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, B. 2010. “Teaching Popular Culture Through Gender Studies: Feminist Pedagogy in a Postfeminist and Neoliberal Academy?” Feminist Teacher 20 (2): 124–138. doi: 10.5406/femteacher.20.2.0124
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, C. 1997. Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2013. The Global Gender Gap Report 2013. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Ylöstalo, H. 2012. Tasa-arvotyön tasa-arvot [ Equalities of Gender Equality Work]. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ylöstalo, H. 2013. “Feministisestä teoriasta käytäntöön – feministinen pedagogiikka tasa-arvokoulutuksessa.” [ From Feminist Theory to Practice – Feminist Pedagogy in Gender Equality Training.] Aikuiskasvatus 33 (2): 118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Ylöstalo, H. 2016. “Organizational Perspective to Gender Mainstreaming in the Finnish State Administration.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 18 (4): 544–558. doi:10.1080/14616742.2016.1149307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. 2011. School Trouble. Identity, Power and Politics in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar