1,655
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 625-643 | Received 23 Jan 2019, Accepted 29 Jun 2020, Published online: 12 Jul 2020

References

  • Abramo, G., C. A. D’Angelo, and A. Caprasecca. 2009. “Gender Differences in Research Productivity: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Italian Academic System.” Scientometrics 79 (3): 517–539. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8.
  • Abramo, G., C. A. D’Angelo, and F. Di Costa. 2008. “Research Collaboration and Productivity: Is There Correlation?” Higher Education 57 (2): 155–71. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z.
  • Acker, J. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4 (2): 139–158.
  • Aiston, S. J., and J. Jung. 2015. “Women Academics and Research Productivity: An International Comparison.” Gender and Education 27 (3): 205–220. doi:10.1080/09540253.2015.1024617.
  • Allen, A. 2013. The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory. New York City: Columbia University Press.
  • Allison, P. D., J. S. Long, and T. K. Krauze. 1982. “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47: 615–625.
  • Amery, F., S. Bates, L. Jenkins, and H. Savigny. 2015. “Metaphors on Women in Academia: A Review of the Literature, 2004–2013.” In Advances in Gender Research. Vol. 20., edited by V. Demos and M. Texler Segal, 245–267. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Arensbergen, P., I. van der Weijden, and P. Besselaar. 2012. “Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity: A Persisting Phenomenon?” Scientometrics 93 (3): 857–868. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0712-y.
  • Beaudry, C., and V. Larivière. 2016. “Which Gender Gap? Factors Affecting Researchers’ Scientific Impact in Science and Medicine.” Research Policy 45 (9): 1790–817. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.009.
  • Biggs, J., P. H. Hawley, and M. Biernat. 2018. “The Academic Conference as a Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions.” Sex Roles 78 (5–6): 394–408. doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0800-9.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1999. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field.” In The Science Studies Reader, edited by M. Biagioli, 31–50. New York: Routledge.
  • Clark Blickenstaff, J. 2005. “Women and Science Careers: Leaky Pipeline or Gender Filter?” Gender and Education 17 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072.
  • Coate, K., and C. K. Howson. 2016. “Indicators of Esteem: Gender and Prestige in Academic Work.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (4): 567–585. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.955082.
  • Cole, J. R., and H. Zuckerman. 1984. “The Productivity Puzzle.” In Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Women in Science, edited by M. W. Steinkamp and M. L. Maehr, 218–258. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Connell, R. W. 1990. “The State, Gender, and Sexual Politics.” Theory and Society 19 (5): 507–544.
  • Correll, S. J. 2001. “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1691–730.
  • Correll, S. J. 2004. “Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations.” American Sociological Review 69 (1): 93–113.
  • Cuthbert, R. 1996. Working in Higher Education. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Davies, C., and R. Healey. 2017. “Hacking Through the Gordian Knot: Can Facilitating Operational Mentoring Untangle the Gender Research Productivity Puzzle in Higher Education?” Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1333494.
  • Ebadi, A., and A. Schiffauerova. 2015. “How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People!.” PloS One 10 (7): e0133061.
  • Edgar, F., and A. Geare. 2013. “Factors Influencing University Research Performance.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (5): 774–92.
  • Etzkowitz, H., and M. Ranga. 2011. “Gender Dynamics in Science and Technology: From the ‘“Leaky Pipeline”’to the ‘“Vanish box.”.” Brussels Economic Review 54 (2/3): 131–48.
  • Faulkner, W. 2007. “Nuts and Bolts and People’ Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities.” Social Studies of Science 37 (3): 331–56.
  • Fisher, V., and S. Kinsey. 2014. “Behind Closed Doors! Homosocial Desire and the Academic Boys Club.” Gender in Management: An International Journal 29 (1): 44–64. doi:10.1108/GM-10-2012-0080.
  • Fox, M. F. 2001. “Women, Science, and Academia: Graduate Education and Careers.” Gender & Society 15 (5): 654–66.
  • Fox, M. F., K. Whittington, and M. Linkova. 2017. “Gender, (In) Equity, and the Scientific Workforce.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 701–732. Cambridge: Mass MIT Press.
  • Fritsch, N.-S. 2015. “At the Leading Edge – Does Gender Still Matter? A Qualitative Study of Prevailing Obstacles and Successful Coping Strategies in Academia.” Current Sociology 63 (4): 547–65.
  • Fritsch, N.-S. 2016. “Patterns of Career Development and Their Role in the Advancement of Female Faculty at Austrian Universities: New Roads to Success?” Higher Education 72 (5): 619–35. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9967-6.
  • Gardiner, M., M. Tiggemann, H. Kearns, and K. Marshall. 2007. “Show me the Money! An Empirical Analysis of Mentoring Outcomes for Women in Academia.” Higher Education Research & Development 26 (4): 425–442.
  • Gaskin, J. 2016. Stats Tool Package. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com.
  • Ghiasi, G., M. Harsh, and A. Schiffauerova. 2018. “Inequality and Collaboration Patterns in Canadian Nanotechnology: Implications for Pro-Poor and Gender-Inclusive Policy.” Scientometrics 115 (2): 785–815.
  • González Ramos, A. M., F. Fernández Palacín, and M. Muñoz Márquez. 2015. “Do Men and Women Perform Academic Work Differently?” Tertiary Education and Management 21 (4): 263–276. doi:10.1080/13583883.2015.1065904.
  • Goulden, M., M. A. Mason, and K. Frasch. 2011. “Keeping Women in the Science Pipeline.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 638 (1): 141–162.
  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Hemlin, S., C. M. Allwood, and B. R. Martin. 2008. “Creative Knowledge Environments.” Creativity Research Journal 20 (2): 196–210.
  • Henley, M. M. 2015. “Women’s Success in Academic Science: Challenges to Breaking Through the Ivory Ceiling: Women’s Success in Academic Science.” Sociology Compass 9 (8): 668–680. doi:10.1111/soc4.12291.
  • Horlings, E., and T. Gurney. 2013. “Search Strategies Along the Academic Lifecycle.” Scientometrics 94 (3): 1137–60. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0789-3.
  • Horta, H. 2012. “Deepening Our Understanding of Academic Inbreeding Effects on Research Information Exchange and Scientific Output: New Insights for Academic Based Research.” Higher Education 65 (4): 487–510. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7.
  • Horta, H., J. Jung, and J. M. Santos. 2018. “Effects of Mobilities on the Research Output and its Multidisciplinarity of Academics in Hong Kong and Macau: An Exploratory Study.” Higher Education Quarterly. doi:10.1111/hequ.12161.
  • Horta, H., and J. M. Santos. 2016. “An Instrument to Measure Individuals’ Research Agenda Setting: The Multi-Dimensional Research Agendas Inventory.” Scientometrics 108 (3): 1243–65. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4.
  • Jensen, D. 2006. “Metaphors as a Bridge to Understanding Educational and Social Contexts.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 36–54.
  • Katz, J. S., and B. R. Martin. 1997. “What is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 26 (1): 1–18.
  • Keller, E. F., and H. E. Longino. 1996. Feminism and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • King, M. M., C. T. Bergstrom, S. J. Correll, J. Jacquet, and J. D. West. 2017. “Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-Citation Across Fields and Over Time.” Socius 3: 1–22. 2378023117738903.
  • Klavans, R., K. W. Boyack, A. A. Sorensen, and C. Chen. 2013. “Towards the Development of an Indicator of Conformity.” 14th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. ISSI.
  • Kline, R. B. 2016. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York City: Guilford press.
  • Kuhn, T. S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
  • Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 2013. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Leahey, E. 2007. “Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings.” American Sociological Review 72 (4): 533–561.
  • Leberman, S. I., B. Eames, and S. Barnett. 2016. “Unless You are Collaborating with a Big Name Successful Professor, You are Unlikely to Receive Funding.” Gender and Education 28 (5): 644–661. doi:10.1080/09540253.2015.1093102.
  • Leung, M. W. 2014. “Unsettling the Yin-Yang Harmony: An Analysis of Gender Inequalities in Academic Mobility among Chinese Scholars.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 23 (2): 155–182.
  • Ley, T. J., and B. H. Hamilton. 2008. “The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications.” Science 322 (5907): 1472–4.
  • Linková, M. 2017. “Academic Excellence and Gender Bias in the Practices and Perceptions of Scientists in Leadership and Decision-Making Positions.” Gender a Výzkum / Gender and Research 18 (1): 42–66. doi:10.13060/25706578.2017.18.1.349.
  • Long, J. S. 1992. “Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity.” Social Forces 71 (1): 159–178.
  • Macha, H. 2011. Women in Academia. In Proceedings from the Second International Conference of the Women Leading Education (WLE) Network. Stuttgart: epubli GmbH.
  • Maranto, C. L., and A. E. Griffin. 2011. “The Antecedents of a ‘Chilly Climate’for Women Faculty in Higher Education.” Human Relations 64 (2): 139–159.
  • Marginson, S. 2008. “Academic Creativity Under New Public Management: Foundations for an Investigation.” Educational Theory 58 (3): 269–287.
  • Marôco, J. 2010. Análise de equações estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. ReportNumber, Lda.
  • McDonald, R. P., and M.-H. R. Ho. 2002. “Principles and Practice in Reporting Structural Equation Analyses.” Psychological Methods 7 (1): 64–82. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.64.
  • Merton, R. K. 1957. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science.” American Sociological Review 22 (6): 635–659.
  • Morgan, D. 1981. “Men, Masculinity and the Process of Sociological Enquiry.” In Doing feminist research, edited by H. Roberts, 83–113. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter, and R. Steers. 1982. “Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover.” Organizational and Occupational Psychology 10 (3): 2008.
  • Okkolin, M.-A. 2016. “Who Decides? Tanzanian Women’s Narratives on Educational Advancement and Agency.” Gender and Education 28 (7): 886–902.
  • Oleksiyenko, A., and W. G. Tierney. 2018. Higher Education and Human Vulnerability: Global Failures of Corporate Design.
  • O’Meara, K., and N. P. Stromquist. 2015. “Faculty Peer Networks: Role and Relevance in Advancing Agency and Gender Equity.” Gender and Education 27 (3): 338–358.
  • Ooms, W., C. Werker, and C. Hopp. 2018. “Moving up the Ladder: Heterogeneity Influencing Academic Careers Through Research Orientation, Gender, and Mentors.” Studies in Higher Education, 1–22. Doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1434617.
  • Pickens, J. 2005. “Attitudes and Perceptions.” Organizational Behavior in Health Care 4 (7): 43–76.
  • Pinheiro, D., J. Melkers, and J. Youtie. 2014. “Learning to Play the Game: Student Publishing as an Indicator of Future Scholarly Success.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81: 56–66. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008.
  • Popper, K. 2005. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Prozesky, H. 2008. “A Career-History Analysis of Gender Differences in Publication Productivity among South African Academics.” Science & Technology Studies 21 (2/2008): 47–67.
  • Prpić, K. 2002. “Gender and Productivity Differentials in Science.” Scientometrics 55 (1): 27–58.
  • Ridgeway, C. L., and S. J. Correll. 2000. “Limiting Inequality Through Interaction: The End(s) of Gender.” Contemporary Sociology 29 (1): 110.
  • Ridgeway, C. L., and S. J. Correll. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System.” Gender & Society 18 (4): 510–531. doi:10.1177/0891243204265269.
  • Rotchford, A. M., S. J. McNamee, and C. L. Willis. 1990. “Gender Differences in Patterns of Publication in Leading Sociology Journals, 1960–1985.” The American Sociologist 21 (2): 99–115.
  • Rzhetsky, A., J. G. Foster, I. T. Foster, and J. A. Evans. 2015. “Choosing Experiments to Accelerate Collective Discovery.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (47): 14569–74.
  • Santos, J. M. 2018. “Development and Validation of the Multi-Dimensional University Research Workplace Inventory (MDURWI).” Higher Education Policy 31 (3): 381–404.
  • Santos, M. H., and L. Amâncio. 2016. “Gender Inequalities in Highly Qualified Professions: A Social Psychological Analysis.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 4 (1): 427–443. doi:10.5964/jspp.v4i1.487.
  • Santos, J. M., and H. Horta. 2018. “The Research Agenda Setting of Higher Education Researchers.” Higher Education 76 (4): 649–668. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0230-9.
  • Santos, J. M., H. Horta, and L. Zhang. 2019. “The Association of Thinking Styles with Research Agendas among Academics in the Social Sciences.” Higher Education Quarterly 74: 193–210. doi:10.1111/hequ.12240.
  • Savigny, H. 2014. “Women, Know Your Limits: Cultural Sexism in Academia.” Gender and Education 26 (7): 794–809.
  • Stack, S. 2004. “Gender, Children and Research Productivity.” Research in Higher Education 45 (8): 891–920.
  • Teelken, C., and R. Deem. 2013. “All are Equal, but Some are More Equal Than Others: Managerialism and Gender Equality in Higher Education in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Education 49 (4): 520–535. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.807642.
  • Terosky, A. L., K. O’Meara, and C. M. Campbell. 2014. “Enabling Possibility: Women Associate Professors’ Sense of Agency in Career Advancement.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7 (1): 58–76. doi:10.1037/a0035775.
  • Uddin, S., L. Hossain, and K. Rasmussen. 2013. “Network Effects on Scientific Collaborations.” PloS One 8: 2.
  • UNESCO. 2018. Women in Science. UNESCO. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs51-women-in-science-2018-en.pdf.
  • van den Besselaar, P., and U. Sandström. 2016. “Gender Differences in Research Performance and its Impact on Careers: A Longitudinal Case Study.” Scientometrics 106 (1): 143–162. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1775-3.
  • van den Besselaar, P., and U. Sandström. 2017. “Vicious Circles of Gender Bias, Lower Positions, and Lower Performance: Gender Differences in Scholarly Productivity and Impact.” PloS One 12 (8): e0183301.
  • Van den Brink, M. 2010. Behind the Scenes of Science: Gender Practices in the Recruitment and Selection of Professors in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Whitchurch, C. 2018. “From a Diversifying Workforce to the Rise of the Itinerant Academic.” Higher Education, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0294-6.
  • Young, M. 2015. “Competitive Funding, Citation Regimes, and the Diminishment of Breakthrough Research.” Higher Education, 1–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.