References
- Antonucci, L. 2018. “Not All Experiences of Precarious Work Lead to Precarity: The Case Study of Young People at University and Their Welfare Mixes.” Journal of Youth Studies 21 (7): 888–904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1421749.
- Archer, C. 2019. “Social Media Influencers, Post-Feminism and Neoliberalism: How Mum Blogger’s ‘Playbour’ is Reshaping Public Relations.” Public Relations Inquiry 8 (2): 149–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X19846530.
- Baker, J. 2010. “Claiming Volition and Evading Victimhood: Post-Feminist Obligations for Young Women.” Feminism & Psychology 20 (2): 186–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509359142.
- Baltar, F., and I. Brunet. 2012. “Social Research 2.0: Virtual Snowball Sampling Method Using Facebook.” Internet Research 22 (1): 57–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960.
- Blair. E. 2017. “Partners for Success? Undergraduate Women’s Post-Feminist Constructions of Intimate Relationships.” Gender and Education 29 (60): 671–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1166184.
- Broadbridge, A., and S. Swanson. 2005. “Earning and Learning: How Term-Time Employment Impacts on Students’ Adjustment to University Life.” Journal of Education and Work 18 (2): 235–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080500086008.
- Brouard, P., and M. Crewe. 2013. “Sweetening the Deal? Sugar Daddies, Sugar Mummies, Sugar Babies and HIV in Contemporary South Africa.” Agenda (Durban, South Africa) 26 (4): 48–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2012.757862.
- Bushi, R. 2019. “Student Money Survey 2019 – Results”. Save the Student! 8 of October. Accessed 29 of June 2020: https://www.savethestudent.org/money/student-money-survey-2019.html#finance.
- Canny, A. 2002. “Flexible Labour? The Growth of Student Employment in the UK.” Journal of Education and Work 15 (3): 277–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908022000012058-2.
- Connington, J. 2018. “The Student Loan System: Five Common Myths Debunked”. The Telegraph, 19 of February. Accessed 14 February 2020: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/student-money/student-loans-five-key-myths-debunked/.
- Cribb, J., A. Norris Keiller, and T. Waters. 2018. “Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2018”. IFS Report, No. R145, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1920/re.ifs.2019.0145.
- Daly, S. 2017. “Sugar Babies and Sugar Daddies: An Exploration of Sugar Dating on Canadian Campuses”. Master’s thesis, Carleton University. https://curve.carleton.ca/5186cf8e-fca9-4e98-8bc5-36239cf1cdf3.
- Dowrick, M., and L. Randall. 2020. “Thousands of Students Using ‘Sugar Daddy’ Websites to Fund University Lifestyle”, The Mirror, January 15. Accessed 14 February 2020. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/thousands-students-using-sugar-daddy-21290038.
- Faugier, J., and M. Sargeant. 1996. “Sampling Hard to Reach Populations.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 790–797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00371.x.
- Fraser, N. 2016. “Contradictions of Capital and Care.” New Left Review 100: 99–117. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii100/articles/nancy-fraser-contradictions-of-capital-and-care.
- Gill, R. 2007. “Postfeminist Media Culture. Elements of a Sensibility.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 10 (2): 147–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898.
- Haeger, H., and R. Deil-Amen. 2010. “Female College Students Working in the Sex Industry: A Hidden Population.” NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education 3 (1): 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-7890.1039.
- Harding, S. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. London: Open University Press.
- Hargittai, E, and A. Hinnant. 2008. “Digital Inequality. Differences in Young Adults’ Use of the Internet.” Communication Research 35 (5): 602–621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782.
- Harvey, L., and R. Gill. 2011. ““Spicing It Up: Sexual Entrepreneurs and the Sex Inspectors”.” In New Femininities, Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity, edited by R. Gill and C. Scharff, 52–67. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Leclerc-Madlala, S. 2003. “Transactional Sex and the Pursuit of Modernity.” Social Dynamics 29 (2): 213–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02533950308628681.
- Longfield, K., A. Glick, M. Waithaka, and J. Berman. 2004. “Relationships Between Older Men and Younger Women: Implications for STIs/HIV in Kenya.” Studies in Family Planning 35 (2): 125–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2004.00014.x.
- Luke, N. 2015. “Confronting the ‘Sugar Daddy’ Stereotype; Age and Economic Asymmetries and Risky Sexual Behavior in Urban Kenya.” International Family Planning Perspectives 31 (1): 6–4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3649496.
- Lunt, I. 2008. “Beyond Tuition Fees? The Legacy of Blair’s Government to Higher Education.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (6): 741–752. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980802519001.
- Mahmud, T. 2015. “A Precarious Existence and Capitalism: A Permanent State of Exception.” Southwestern Law Review 44: 699–726. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/swulr44&i=719.
- Marginson, S. 2018. “Global Trends in Higher Education Financing; The United Kingdom.” International Journal of Educational Development 58: 26–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.008.
- Mixon, F. G. 2018. “Sugar Daddy U: Human Capital Investment and the University-based Supply of ‘Romantic Arrangements’.” Applied Economics 51 (9): 956–971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1524129.
- Motyl, J. 2013. “Trading Sex for College Tuition: How Sugar Daddy ‘Dating’ Sites May Be Sugar Coating Prostitution.” Penn State Law Review 117: 927–957. http://www.pennstatelawreview.org/117/3/Motyl%20final.pdf.
- National Union of Students.. 2018. “Class Dismissed: Getting in and Getting on in Further and Higher Education”. National Union of Students, 23 April 2018. Accessed 17 February 2020. https://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/class-dismissed-getting-in-and-getting-on-in-further-and-higher-education.
- Nayar, K. 2017. “Sweetening the Deal: Dating for Compensation in the Digital Age.” Journal of Gender Studies 26 (3): 335–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1273101.
- Phaswana-Mafuya, N., O. Shisana, A. Davids, C. Tabane, M. Mbelle, G. Matseke, M. Banyini, and Q. Kekana. 2014. “Perceptions of Sugar Mommy Practices in South Africa.” Journal of Psychology in Africa 24 (3): 257–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2014.906086.
- Pitcher, J. 2019. “Intimate Labour and the State: Contrasting Policy Discourses with the Working Experiences of Indoor Sex Workers.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 16: 138–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0323-3.
- Roberts, R. 2018. Capitalism on Campus: Sex Work, Academic Freedom and the Market. London: Zero Books.
- Roberts, R., S. Bergström, and D. La Rooy. 2007. “Sex Work and Students: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31 (4): 323–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701625720.
- Roberts, R., J. Golding, T. Towell, S. Reid, S. Woodford, A. Vetere, and I. Weinreb. 2000. “Mental and Physical Health in Students: The Role of Economic Circumstances.” British Journal of Health Psychology 5 (3): 289–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/135910700168928.
- Roberts, R., A. Jones, and T. Sanders. 2013. “Students and Sex Work in the UK: Providers and Purchasers.” Sex Education 13: 349–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2012.744304.
- Roberts, R., T. Sanders, E. Myers, and D. Smith. 2010. “Participation in Sex Work: Students’ Views.” Sex Education 10 (2): 145–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811003666507.
- Sagar, T., D. Jones, K. Symons, J. Bowring, and And R. Roberts. 2015. “Student Participation in the Sex Industry: Higher Education Responses and Staff Experiences and Perceptions.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37 (4): 400–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1056604.
- Sanders, T., and K. Hardy. 2013. “Sex Work: The Ultimate Precarious Labour?” Criminal Justice Matters 93 (1): 16–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2013.833760.
- Seeking.. 2020a. “Relationship on Your Terms”. Seeking. Accessed 13 February 2020. https://www.seeking.com/.
- Seeking.. 2020b. How It Works”. Seeking. Accessed 13 February 2020. https://www.seeking.com/how-it-works.
- Seeking.. 2020c. “Sugar Baby University United Kingdom”. Seeking. Accessed 13 February 2020. https://www.seeking.com/p/sugar-baby-university-2020/uk/#gref.
- Selikow, T. A., and T. Mbulaheni. 2013. “I Do Love Him but at the Same Time I Can’t Eat Love: Sugar Daddy Relationships for Conspicuous Consumption Amongst Urban University Students in South Africa.” Agenda (Durban, South Africa) 27 (2): 86–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2013.809930.
- Smith, J., and M. Osborn. 2008. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, edited by Jonathan Smith, 53–80. London: SAGE.
- Story, R., and G. Jankowski. 2015. “Victor or Victim? Foregrounding the Independent Escort Experience Outside of the Polarised Debate.” Graduate Journal of Social Science 11 (2): 4–20. http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/2182/.
- Tapper, M. K. 2019. “Enrolling in Sugar Baby University”. The Crimson, May 20. Accessed 13 February 2020. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2019/5/20/sugar-baby-university/.
- Vaara, E. 2010. “Critical Discourse Analysis as Methodology in Strategy as Practice Research.” In Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, edited by D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, and E. Vaara, 217–299. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
- West, A., J. Roberts, J. Lewis, and P. Noden. 2015. “Paying for Higher Education in England: Funding Policy and Families.” British Journal of Educational Studies 63 (1): 23–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2014.990353.