How feminist knowledge is made in and beyond disciplines

References

• Acker, Sandra, and Anne Wagner. 2019. “Feminist Scholars Working around the Neoliberal University.” Gender and Education 31 (1): 62–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins, Lisa. 2002. “Sexuality and Economy: Historicisation vs Deconstruction.” Australian Feminist Studies 17 (37): 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Judith A., and Sally L. Kitch. 1998. “Disciplined by Disciplines? The Need for an Interdisciplinary Research Mission in Women’s Studies.” Feminist Studies 24 (2): 275–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amariglio, Jack, Stephen Resnick, and Richard D Wolff. 1993. “Division and Difference in the “Discipline” of Economics.” In Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, edited by Ellen Messer-Davidow, David R. Shumway, and David Sylvan, 150–184. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Angervall, Petra. 2018. “The Academic Career: A Study of Subjectivity, Gender and Movement among Women University Lecturers.” Gender and Education 30 (1): 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, Andrew, Georgina Born, and Gisa Weszkalnys. 2008. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, Chris. 1994. Sexual Economyths: Conceiving a Feminist Economics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, Jill. 2014. “‘Wasting Talent’? Gender and the Problematics of Academic Disenchantment and Disengagement with Leadership.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (1): 86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxer, Marilyn J. 2000. “Unruly Knowledge: Women’s Studies and the Problem of Disciplinarity.” NWSA Journal 12 (2): 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Breeze, Maddie, and Yvette Taylor. 2020. “Feminist Collaborations in Higher Education: Stretched across Career Stages.” Gender and Education 32 (3): 412–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, Raewyn. 2010. “Lives of the Businessmen. Reflections on Life-History Method and Contemporary Hegemonic Masculinity.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 35 (2): 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, Raewyn. 2013. “The Neoliberal Cascade and Education: An Essay on the Market Agenda and Its Consequences.” Critical Studies in Education 54 (2): 99–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, Raewyn, Rebecca Pearse, Fran Collyer, João Maia, and Robert Morrell. 2018. “Re-Making the Global Economy of Knowledge: Do New Fields of Research Change the Structure of North–South Relations?” The British Journal of Sociology 69 (3): 738–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowden, Mhairi, Kirsty McLaren, Alison Plumb, and Marian Sawer. 2012. Advancement of Women in Australian Political Science: Workshop Report. Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, Martin, and Paul Sendziuk. 2018. The State of the Discipline: University History in Australia and New Zealand, Report to the Australian Historical Association Executive. Canberra: Australian Historical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Damousi, Joy, and Marilyn Lake. 1995. Gender and War: Australians at War in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, Myra Marx, and Kathrin Zippel. 2015. “Gender Equality in the Age of Academic Capitalism: Cassandra and Pollyanna Interpret University Restructuring.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 22 (4): 561–584.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, Hannah. 2015. “Expanding Higher Education: Institutional Responses in Australia from the Post-War Era to the 1970s.” Paedagogica Historica 51 (3): 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotaki, Marianna. 2013. “No Woman Is Like a Man (in Academia): The Masculine Symbolic Order and the Unwanted Female Body.” Organization Studies 34 (9): 1251–1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, Eliza. 2008. “Improving the Participation of Women in the Philosophy Profession.” In Sydney: Committee of Senior Academics Addressing the Status of Women in the Philosophy Profession (Dodds, Susan, Burns, Lynda, Colyvan, Mark, Jackson, Frank, Jones, Karen, and Mackenzie, Catriona), Australasian Association of Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, Katrina, and Fiona Jenkins. 2013. Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Fiona, and Helen Keane. 2014. “Gender and Feminism in the Social Sciences: Equity, Excellence and Knowledge in the Disciplines.” Australian Feminist Studies 29 (80): 107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Fiona, Helen Keane, and Claire Donovan. 2019. “Work (Still) in Progress: Establishing the Value of Gendered Innovations in the Social Sciences.” Women's Studies International Forum 72: 104–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Carol. 2014. “Hard Heads and Soft Hearts.” Australian Feminist Studies 29 (80): 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, Briony. 2017. “Measures of Success: Cruel Optimism and the Paradox of Academic Women’s Participation in Australian Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 36 (3): 486–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, Briony, and Elizabeth Mackinlay. 2016. We Only Talk Feminist Here: Feminist Academics, Voice and Agency in the Neoliberal University. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, Gabrielle, and Julie A. Nelson. 2004. “Survey Article: Feminism in the Dismal Science.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1): 102–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer-Davidow, Ellen, David R. Shumway, and David Sylvan. 1993. Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Ruth. 2009. “Disciplinarity.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education, edited by Malcolm Tight, Ka Ho Mok, Jeroen Huisman, and Christopher Morphew, 487–500. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Ruth, Sharon Parry, and Tony Becher. 2002. “Teaching and Learning in Their Disciplinary Contexts: A Conceptual Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 405–417. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, Carol. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, Rebecca, James N. Hitchcock, and Helen Keane. 2019. “Gender, Inter/Disciplinarity and Marginality in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Comparison of Six Disciplines.” Women's Studies International Forum 72: 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probert, Belinda. 2005. “‘I Just Couldn’t Fit It in’: Gender and Unequal Outcomes in Academic Careers.” Gender, Work and Organization 12 (1): 50–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Suzanne, Julia Connell, and John Burgess. 2017. “Casual Academics: A New Public Management Paradox.” Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 27 (1): 56–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawer, Marian. 1996. “Gender, Metaphor and the State.” Feminist Review 52 (1): 118–134.
   Google Scholar
• Sawer, Marian. 2004. “The Impact of Feminist Scholarship on Australian Political Science.” Australian Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 553–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawer, Marian, Fiona Jenkins, and Karen Downing. 2020. How Gender Can Transform the Social Sciences: Innovation and Impact. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simic, Zora. 2010. “‘Door Bitches of Club Feminism’?: Academia and Feminist Competency.” Feminist Review 95 (1): 75–91. doi:10.1057/fr.2009.60.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, Beverley. 2008. “The Dirty History of Feminism and Sociology: Or the War of Conceptual Attrition.” The Sociological Review 56 (4): 670–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swidler, Ann, and Jorge Arditi. 1994. “The New Sociology of Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology 20 (1): 305–329.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Margaret. 2013. “The Mirage of Merit: Reconstituting the ‘Ideal Academic’.” Australian Feminist Studies 28 (76): 127–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, Marieke, and Yvonne Benschop. 2012. “Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs.” Organization 19 (4): 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2003. “Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines.” Current Anthropology 44 (4): 453–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelert, Peter, and Victoria Millar. 2013. “The ‘Paradox of Interdisciplinarity’ in Australian Research Governance.” Higher Education 66 (6): 755–767. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9634-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar