Affective alignment and epistemic polarization: the case of feminist research in the neoliberalized university

References

• Aarseth, H. 2022. “The Implicit Epistemology of Metric Governance.” Critical Studies in Education 63 (5): 589–605. doi:10.1080/17508487.2022.2037680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2010. “Happy Objects.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aksnes, D., F. Piro, and L. Nygaard. 2022. “Kjønn og Vitenskapelig Publisering - Betydningen av Kontekst [Gender and Scientific Publication - the significance of context].” In Kjønn i Akademia - På vei mot balanse, edited by H. Aarseth and I. Owesen. Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., and A. Olmedo. 2013. “Care of the Self, Resistance and Subjectivity Under Neoliberal Governmentalities.” Critical Studies in Education 54 (1): 85–96. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.740678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, B. P., D. Holditch-Davis, and M. S. Miles. 2009. “Life Course Theory as a Framework to Examine Becoming a Mother of a Medically Fragile Preterm Infant.” Research in Nursing & Health 32 (1): 38–49. doi:10.1002/nur.20298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. 2021. “Governing Knowledge in the Entrepreneurial University.” Critical Studies in Education 63 (5): 622–638. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1858912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. 2015. “The Rule of Mimetic Desire in Higher Education: Governing through Naming, Shaming and Faming.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1096191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., and O. Pedersen. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carbin, M., and S. Edenheim. 2013. “The Intersectional Turn in Feminist Theory: A Dream of a Common Language?” European Journal of Women's Studies 20 (3): 233–248. doi:10.1177/1350506813484723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, L. 2014. “Feminist Epistemology and the Politics of Knowledge: Questions of Marginality.” In SAGE Handbook of Feminist Theory, edited by M. Evans, 9–25. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. 2012. What are Universities for? Rushden: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2007. Southern Theory: Social Science and The Global Dynamics of Knowledge. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• David, M. 2015. Feminism, Gender and Universities: Politics, Passion and Pedagogies. Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• David, M. E. 2016. “Feminism, Activism and Academe: a Personal Reflection.” Women's History Review 25 (6): 983–998. doi:10.1080/09612025.2015.1083245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenheim, S., and M. Rönnblom. 2014. “Academic Feminism on its Own: Institutionalization, Organization and Critique.” Tidsskrift för Genusvetenskap 35 (1): 100–121.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. She Figures 2021 - Gender in Research and Innovation: Statistics and Indicators. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/06090.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gair, S., T. Hager, and O. Herzog. 2021. Compliance and Resistance within Neoliberal Academia. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2009. “Breaking the Silence.” In Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections, edited by R. Ryan-Flood, and R. Gill, 228–244. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J. 2011. “On the Ideological and Political Significance of Fantasy in the Organization of Work.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 16 (4): 373–393. doi:10.1057/pcs.2010.34.
   Google Scholar
• Gvozdanovic, J., and K. Maes. 2018. Implicit Bias in Academia. LERU, League of European Universities. https://www.leru.org/files/implicit-bias-in-academia-full-paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. 2010. Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. 2012. “Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation.” Feminist Theory 13 (2): 147–161. doi:10.1177/1464700112442643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffart, A. R. 2021. “Intersectional Intersectionality?” Doctoral dissertation. Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, E. D. 2005. “The Life Course Perspective: A Promising Approach for Bridging the Micro and Macro Worlds for Social Workers.” Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 86 (1): 143–152. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, K.-M., and T. Kallio. 2014. “Management-by-results and Performance Measurement in Universities – Implications for Work Motivation.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (4): 574–589. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivistö, J., E. Pekkola, and A. Lyytinen. 2017. “The Influence of Performance-Based Management on Teaching and Research Performance of Finnish Senior Academics.” Tertiary Education and Management 23 (3): 260–275. doi:10.1080/13583883.2017.1328529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korvajärvi, P., and J. Vuori. 2016. “A Classroom of Our Own.” Women's Studies International Forum 54 (1): 138–146. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.06.012
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. 1993. “Subjects, Power, and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophy of Science.” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff and E. Potter, 101–121. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Magset, M., A. Midtbøen, and D. Wollebæk. 2022. “Finansieringssystemer og faglige "stammekriger": En trussel mot ytringsfrihet i akademia? [Research economies and disciplinary tribe wars: A threat to freedom of speech in Academia?].” In Ytringsfrihet i en ny offentlighet: Grensene for debatt og rommet for kunnskap, edited by M. Mangiest, A. Midtbøen, and K. Thorbjørnsrud. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Messer-Davidow, E. 2002. Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moi, T. 1999. What is a Woman? And Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 2015. “Troubling Intra-actions: Gender, Neo-liberalism and Research in the Global Academy.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (1): 28–45. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1062919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 2018. “Gender in the Neo-liberal Research Economy: An Enervating and Exclusionary Entanglement?” In Gender Studies and the New Academia Governance, edited by H. Kahlert. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L., and R. W. B. Lund. 2021. “The Affective Economy of Feminist Leadership in Finnish Universities: Class-based Knowledge for Navigating Neoliberalism and Neuroliberalism.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 42 (1): 114–130. doi:10.1080/01596306.2020.1855567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikiforova, I. 2012. “The Paradox of Excellence: Merit and Occupational Attainments of Women in Computer Science.” Proceedings from GEXcel Theme 11–12: Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s), 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. 2017a. Power, Knowledge and Feminist Scholarship (Open Access): An Ethnography of Academia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. 2017b. “Man kan känna uttmatningen i luften.” Tidsskrift for Genusvetenskap 38 (4): 8–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, A. 2018. “Writing as Labiaplasty.” Organization 25 (1): 123–130. doi:10.1177/1350508417735537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puuska, H. M. 2014. Scholarly Publishing Patterns in Finland: A Comparison of Disciplinary Groups. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton, M. 2015. Four Waves of Feminism. Pacific University of Oregon. Retrieved on May 17th 2023, https://www.pacificu.edu/magazine/four-waves-feminism.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, P. 2012. “What is Distinctive about Feminist Epistemology at 25?.” In Out from the shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy, edited by S. Crasnow and A. Supersonic, 339–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salskov, S. A. 2020. “A Critique of Our Own? On Intersectionality and “Epistemic Habits” in a Study of Racialization and Homonationalism in a Nordic Context.” NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 28 (3): 251–265. doi:10.1080/08038740.2020.1789218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, S., and S. Ahmed. 2014. “Affect/Emotion: Orientation Matters.” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Geschlechterstudien 20 (2): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3224/fzg.v20i2.17137.
   Google Scholar
• Shouse, E. 2005. “Feeling, Emotion, Affect.” Media/Culture Journal 8 (6). doi:10.5204/mcj.2443.
   Google Scholar
• Sifaki, A. 2016. “Which Side are we on? Feminist Studies in the Time of Neoliberalism or Neoliberal Feminist Studies.” Women's Studies International Forum 54 (1): 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.06.011
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 2006. Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Snickare, L., Ø. G. Holter, and K. Liestøl. 2022. “Men, Masculinities and Professional Hierarchies.” In Gender Equality in Academia - from Knowledge to Change, edited by Ø. G. Holter and L. Snickare, 53–79. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. C. 2007. “Embodiment, Academics, and the Audit Culture: a Story Seeking Consideration.” Qualitative Research 7 (4): 521–550. doi:10.1177/1468794107082306.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. 2021. Gender Equality in Finland 2021. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2008. “Higher Education Research as Tribe, Territory and/or Community.” Higher Education 55 (5): 593–605. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9077-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursin, J. 2019. “Higher Education Reforms in Finland: From a Ponderous to a More Agile System?.” In Higher Education System Reform: An International Comparison after Twenty Years of Bologna, edited by B. Broucker, K. De Wit, J. C. Verhoeven, and L. Leišytė, 67–77. Brill Sense. doi:10.1163/9789004400115_005.
   Google Scholar
• Välimaa, J. 2012. “The Corporatization of National Universities in Finland.” In Universities and the Public Sphere, edited by S. Pusser, K. Kempner, S. Marginson, and I. Ordorika, 115–134. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vuolanto, P., and M. Kolehmainen. 2021. “Gendered Boundary-work within the Finnish Skepticism Movement.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (4): 789–814. doi:10.1177/0162243920947475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigman, R. 2016. “No Guarantees: Feminism’s Academic Affect and Political Fantasy.” Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture and Social Justice 37 (2): 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, R. 2019. “The Use of Composite Narratives to Present Interview Findings.” Qualitative Research 19 (4): 471–480. doi:10.1177/1468794118787711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. 2012. “Scholarly Publishing’s Gender Gap: Women Cluster in Certain Fields, According to a Study of Millions of Journal Articles, While Men Get More Credit.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. October 22 2012.
   Google Scholar