Confused Expectations: Decentralizing the Management of EU Programmes

References

• Apter, D. (1965), The Politics of Modernization (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
   Google Scholar
• Common, R, Flynn, N. and Mellon, E. (1992), Managing Public Services: Competition and Decentralization (Butterworth, Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Court of Auditors (1996),Annual report concerning the financial year 1995 with the institutions’ replies. Official Journal of the European Communities, OJ C340, 39 (12 November 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. (1994), The globalization of public services production: Can government be ‘best in world’? Public Policy and Administration, 9, 2, pp. 36–64.
   Google Scholar
• EC (1999),Designing Tomorrow’s Commission: A Review of the Commission’s Organization and Operation (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (1999a), Reform of the Structural Funds 2000–2006, Comparative Analysis (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (1999b), The PHARE Programme: Annual Report 1998 (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2000),Reforming the Commission:A White Paper—Part I (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2000a), Reforming the Commission: A White Paper—Part II (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2000b), Progress Report on the Reform Actions as at 10 July 2000 (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2000c), Communication from the Commission: Externalization of the Management of Community Programmes—Proposal for a Council Regulation, COM (2000) 788 final (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2000d), Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament Concerning the Development of the External Service, COM (2000) 456 final (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2001), European Governance: A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2001a), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The Results of the Programming of the Structural Funds 2000–06, COM(2001)378 final (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2001b), The Development of the External Service: Communication from the Commission, COM (2001) 381 final (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2001c), Reform Progress Report-February 2001, COM (2001) 115 final (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2001d), Commission will Fully Implement ABM by 2004, Memo/0l/278 (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, Committee on Budgetary Control (2000), Report on Action to be Taken on the Second Report of the Committee of Independent Experts on the Reform of the Commission (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2000a), Committee on Budgets, Report on the White Paper on Reforming the Commission (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2000b), Committee on Constitutional Affairs, Report on the White Paper on Reforming the Commission (Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• Evaluation Partnership (1999), Evaluation of the Implementation and Results of SEM 2000 and its Contribution to the Overall Management Reform of the Commission (European Commission, Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991), A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 1, pp. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995), Emerging issues in public administration. Public Administration, 73, 1, pp. 165–183.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2001), The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• Kinnock, N. (2002), Accountability and reform of internal control in the Commission. Political Quarterly, 73,1, pp. 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R (1996), Managing VFM audit in the EU: The challenge of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, 4, pp. 509–529.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R (1998), Re-engineering audit and performance management for multi-level governance: The EU experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64, 1, pp. 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (1999), (Ed), Managing, Monitoring and Evaluating the EU Budget: Internal and External Perspectives (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht).
   Google Scholar
• Levy.R. (2000), 1mplementing European Union Public Policy (Elgar, Cheltenham).
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, L. (1992), After 1992:Can the Commission manage Europe? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51,1, pp. 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, L. (1999), Reforming the Commission. EIPASCOPE, 3, pp. 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Middelhoek, A. et al. (1999), First Report on Allegations Regarding Fraud, Mismanagement and Nepotism in the European Commission (Committee of Independent Experts, Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• Middelhoek, A et al. (1999a), Second Report on Reform of the Commission Analysis of Current Practice and Proposals for Tackling Mismanagement, Irregularities: and Fraud (Committee of Independent Experts, Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• Middelhoek, A et al. (1999b), Second Report on Reform of the Commission Analysis of Current Practice and Proposals for Tackling Mismanagement, Irregularities and Fraud. Vol. II (Committee of Independent Experts, Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2001), Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (Sage, London).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1993),Managerialism and the Public Services (Blackwell, Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Birchall, J. and Putnam, K. (1998), Decentralizing Public Service Management (Macmillan, Basingstoke).
   Google Scholar
• Pratley, A. (1999), Budgetary control in the European Union: Strengths and weaknesses. In Levy, R. (Ed),Managing, Monitoring and Eualuating the EU Budget: Internal and External Perspectives (EIPA, Maastricht), pp. 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. and Stevens, H. (1997), Le non-management de l’Europe. Politique et Management Public, 15, 1, pp. 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. and Stevens, H. (2001), Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union (Palgrave, Basingstoke).
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, D. (1992), The Finances of Europe (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
   Google Scholar