A strategy framework for performance measurement in the public sector

References

• Abernethy, M. A. and Lillis, A M. (2001), Interdependencies in organization design: a test in hospitals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, pp. 107–129. doi: 10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.107
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. and Halachmi, A. (1995), Reengineering in the public sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 61, 3, pp. 329– 342. doi: 10.1177/002085239506100302
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2002), Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: an evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22, 2, pp. 17–24. doi: 10.1111/1467-9302.00303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S. (1997), A contingent rationale for cost system design in services. Management Accounting Research, 8, pp. 325–346. doi: 10.1006/mare.1996.0049
   Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S. and Ittner, C. D. (2004), Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 3–4, pp. 243–267. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. (2003), Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 2–3, pp. 127–168. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folz, D. H. (2004), Service quality and benchmarking the performance of municipal services. Public Administration Review, 64, 2, pp. 209–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garengo, P. and Bititci, U. (2007), Towards a contingency approach to performance measurement: an empirical study in Scottish SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 8, pp. 802–825. doi: 10.1108/01443570710763787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, M. and Mannion, R. (2004), The role of horizontal and vertical approaches to performance measurement and improvement in the UK public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 28, 1, pp. 75–95.
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C. and Ojasalo, K. (2004), Service productivity: towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services. Journal of Business Research, 57, 4, pp. 414–423. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00275-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995), The new public management in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, pp. 93–109. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. and Goddard, M. (2007), How do performance indicators add up? An examination of composite indicators in public services. Public Money & Management, 27, 2, pp. 103–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, E. P. (2004), Performance measurement in governmental organizations: a contingent approach to measurement and management control. Managerial Finance, 30, 8, pp. 54–68. doi: 10.1108/03074350410769227
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2005), What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management? Public Money & Management, 25, 1, pp. 9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard—Translating Strategy into Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
   Google Scholar
• Laihonen, H., Jääskeläinen, A. and Pekkola, S. (2014), Measuring performance of a service system—from organizations to customerperceived performance. Measuring Business Excellence, 18, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J. E. (1997), Public sector reform in the Nordic countries. In Lane, J. E. (Ed), Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems (Sage, London), pp. 188–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, A., McKevitt, D. and Millar, M. (2000), Coping with ambiguity: reconciling external legitimacy and organizational implementation in performance measurement. Public Money & Management, 20, 3, pp. 13–19. doi: 10.1111/1467-9302.00218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, R. (1993), Business process reengineering: newest fad, or revolution in government. Public Management, 75, 11, pp. 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lönnqvist, A. and Laihonen, H. (2012), Welfare service system productivity: the concept and its application. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 2, pp. 128– 141. doi: 10.1108/17410401211194644
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. and Streib, G. (1999), Performance measurement in municipal government: assessing the state of the practise. Public Administration Review, 59, 4, pp. 325–335. doi: 10.2307/3110115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., van Thiel, S. and Homburg, V. (2007), New public management in Europe. Management Online Review, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2001), Performance management, evaluation and learning in modern local government. Public Administration, 79, 2, pp. 297– 313. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00257
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (1999), Public performance—towards a new model? Public Policy and Administration, 14, 3, pp. 15–32. doi: 10.1177/095207679901400302
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, M. and Pitt, M. (2009), Customer performance measurement in facilities management: a strategic approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58, 5, pp. 407–422. doi: 10.1108/17410400910965698
   Google Scholar