Between bricolage and breakthroughs—framing the many faces of public sector innovation

References

• Arundel, A. and Hollanders, H. (2011), A taxonomy of innovation: how do public sector agencies operate? Results of the 2010 European Innobarometer survey of public agencies. INNO Metrics Thematic Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. and Huber, D. (2013), From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, pp. 146–159. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2010), Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society (Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. (2011), Measuring Public Innovation in the Nordic Countries—Final Report: MEPIN (Measuring Public Innovation in the Nordic Countries) Project (Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation).
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. and Bugge, M. M. (2013), Public sector innovation—from theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, pp. 133–145. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. (2001), Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 3, pp. 310–319. doi: 10.1108/14691930110400128
   Google Scholar
• Bugge, M. M., Mortensen, P. S. and Bloch, C. (2011), Measuring Public Innovation in Nordic Countries: Report on the Nordic Pilot Studies— Analyses of Methodology and Results (NIFU report 40/2011).
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (2008), Innovation Nation White Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Djellal, F., Gallouj, F. and Miles, I. (2013), Two decades of research on innovation in services: which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, pp. 98–117. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010), Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010—The Innovation Union's Performance Scoreboard for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011), Horizon 2020— The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013), European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard (EPSIS)—A Pilot Exercise (DG Enterprise and Industry).
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. (2005), Innovation—a guide to the literature. In Fagerberg, J. et al. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L. (2010), Bricolage and invisible innovation in public service innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics, 1, pp. 67–87. doi: 10.3917/jie.005.0067
   Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L. and Sørensen, F. (2011), The balance between bricolage and innovation: management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. Service Industries Journal, 31, pp. 581–595. doi: 10.1080/02642069.2010.504302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F. and Weinstein, O. (1997), Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26, pp. 537–556. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup (2011), Analytical Report—Innovation in Public Administration. Report commissioned by the DG Enterprise and Industry of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R. and Karnøe, P. (2003), Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, pp. 277–300. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gault, F. (2013b), The Oslo Manual. In Gault, F. (Ed), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement (Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Gault, F. (2013a), Innovation indicators and measurement: challenges. In Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002), Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi- level perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31, pp. 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014), Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31, pp. 21–40. doi: 10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. and Alford, J. (2015), Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47, 6, pp. 711–739. doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. and Baker, C. (2011), Public Sector Innovation Index (Report produced by Ernst & Young for NESTA).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G., Mulgan, G. and Muers, S. (2002), Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform (Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office).
   Google Scholar
• Koch, P. and Hauknes, J. (2005), Innovation in the Public Sector. Report No. D20 (NIFU STEP).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A. (2014), The challenge of addressing grand challenges. A think piece on how innovation can be driven towards the ‘grand challenges’ as defined under the European Union Framework Programme Horizon 2020. In Report to ERIAB.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (Pinter).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. (2015), Twenty Challenges for Innovation Studies, SPRU Working Paper 2015-30 (University of Sussex).
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2011), The Entrepreneurial State (Demos).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. and Hartley, J. (2008), Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10, pp. 3–20. doi: 10.1080/14719030701763161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (2005), Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 25, 1, pp. 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2002), The Frascati Manual: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2010), The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2012), OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (www.oecd.org).
   Google Scholar
• OECD and Eurostat (2005), The Oslo Manual— Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. and Brown, L. (2011), Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK: the word that would be king? Public Administration, 89, pp. 1335–1350. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. C., Mossialos, E., Papanicolas, I. and Leatherman, S. (2009), Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement—Experiences, Challenges and Prospects (Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Torugsa, N. A. and Arundel, A. (2014), Complexity of innovation in the public sector: a workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes. Public Management Review. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.984626.
   Google Scholar
• Windrum, P. (2008), Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. In Windrum, P. and Koch, P. (Eds), Innovation in Public Sector Services—Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management (Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar