References
- Boulton, J., Allen, P. and Bowman, C. (2015), Embracing Complexity: Strategic Perspectives for an Age of Turbulence (Oxford University Press).
- Byrne, D. and Callaghan, G. (2014), Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art (Routledge).
- Children England (2014), Declaration of Interdependence (www.childrenengland.org.uk).
- Conaty, F. (2012), Performance management challenges in hybrid NPO/public sector settings: an Irish case. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 3 pp. 290–309. doi: 10.1108/17410401211205650
- FSG (2015), See www.fsg.org/approach-areas/collective-impact
- Gibbon, J. (2013), Accountability insights: a multitude of dimensions contexts and meanings (seminar paper: Newcastle University Business School).
- Halligan, J., Sarrico, C. and Rhodes, M. L. (2012), On the road to performance governance in the public domain? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 3, pp. 224–234. doi: 10.1108/17410401211205623
- Lowe, T. and Wilson, R. (2015), Playing the game of outcomes-based performance management. Is gamesmanship inevitable? Evidence from theory and practice. Social Policy and Administration. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12205.
- Lowe, T. and Wilson, R. (2016), The performance management of social interventions in complex systems. Paper presented at the IRSPM conference, Hong Kong.
- Mowles, C. (2014), Complex, but not quite complex enough: the turn to the complexity sciences in evaluation scholarship. Evaluation, 20, 2, pp. 160–175. doi: 10.1177/1356389014527885
- O’Donnell, G. (1998), Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9, 3 pp. 112–126. doi: 10.1353/jod.1998.0051
- Tomkinson, E. (2016), Outcome-based contracting for human services. Evidence Base, 1.