The quiet return of equalization alongside incentive in the English local government finance system

References

• Askham, P. and Mackmin, D. (1995), Rating Law: The Uniform Business Rate (Sweet & Maxwell).
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., King, D. and Eiser, D. (2012), Assessing Relative Spending Needs of Devolved Government: The Case of Healthcare Spending in the UK (University of Stirling).
   Google Scholar
• Blochliger, H. and Charbit, C. (2008), Fiscal Equalization (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• British Retail Consortium (2014), Business Rates: The Case for Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Carr-West, J. (2016), Conservative leaders’ outcry is a warning to No. 10. Local Government Chronicle (28 January).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., March, J. and Olsen, J. (1972), A garbage can model of organisational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1, pp. 1–25. doi: 10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance (1976), Report of the Committee of Inquiry (The Layfield Report), Cmnd 6453 (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2011a), Proposals For Business Rates Retention—Consultation (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2011b), Proposals for Business Rates Retention—Summary of Responses (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2012a), Business Rates Retention: Policy Statement (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2012b), Business Rates Retention and the Local Government Finance Settlement: A Practitioner’s Guide (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2015), Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement 2016 to 2017 and an Offer to Councils for Future Years: Consultation (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2016a), Final Local Government Finance Settlement (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2016b), Self-Sufficient Local Government: Proposals for 100% Business Rate Retention (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T. (2014), Confrontation or negotiation? Valuer (March), p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Emmerson, C., Johnson, P. and Miller, C. (Eds), (2014), The IFS Green Budget 2014 (Institute for Fiscal Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Forder, J. and Vadean, F. (2014), Estimating Relative Needs Formulae for New Forms of Social Care Support (PSSRU, University of Kent).
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C., Jackman, R., and Perlman, M. (1980), Local Government Finance in a Unitary State (George Allen & Unwin).
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, A. and Asthana, S. (2011), Resource allocation for English local government. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 174, 3, pp. 529–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00701.x
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, A. and Asthana, S. (2012), A tangled web: complexity and inequality in the English local government finance settlement. Local Government Studies, 38, 3, pp. 301–320. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.642947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, N. (2015), The winners mustn’t take it all in the business rates revolution. Local Government Chronicle (7 October).
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2015), Autumn Statement 2015 (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, D. and Tetlow, G. (2015a), Central Cuts, Local Decision-Making: Changes in Local Government Spending and Revenues in England, 2009–10 to 2014–15 (Institute for Fiscal Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, D. and Tetlow, G. (2015b), Delivering fiscal squeeze by cutting local government spending. Fiscal Studies, 36, 3, pp. 303–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2015.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, R. (1985), Local government finance. In Loughlin M. et al. (Eds), Half a Century of Municipal Decline (George Allen & Unwin).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. and Stewart, J. (2002), Central–local relations since the Layfield Report. Local Government Studies, 28, 3, pp. 7–28. doi: 10.1080/714004155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King’s Fund (2014), A New Settlement for Health and Social Care (The Barker Commission).
   Google Scholar
• LGA/CIPFA (2015), Financing English Devolution.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. and Olsen, J. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions (Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Mirrlees, J. et al. (2011), Tax by Design (Institute for Fiscal Studies)
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon-Smith, K. and Greenhalgh, P. (2015a), Passing the buck without the bucks: some reflections on fiscal decentralisation and the business rate retention scheme in England. Local Economy, 30, 6, pp. 609–626. doi: 10.1177/0269094215599724
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon-Smith, K. and Greenhalgh, P. (2015b), Making Sense of Fiscal Devolution in Public-Sector Service Delivery (www.speri.dept.shef.ac.uk).
   Google Scholar
• NAO (2014), Financial Sustainability of Local Authorities 2014, HC 783.
   Google Scholar
• PAC (2011), Formula Funding of Local Public Services, HC 1502.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000), Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 2, pp. 251–267. doi: 10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, B. (2015), Not Even Wrong (Local Government Chronicle).
   Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. (2016), Public services and local government: the end of the principle of ‘funding following duties’. Local Government Studies, 42, 4, pp. 637–656. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2016.1171753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. (2006), Formula Funding of Public Services (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2012), Getting to grips with England’s formula for local authority support. Public Money & Management, 32, 2, pp. 145–152. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2012.656022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travers, T. and Esposito, L. (2004), Nothing to Lose but Your Chains (Localis).
   Google Scholar
• Travers, T. (2015), Greg Clark and George Osborne are revolutionary radicals. Local Government Chronicle (18 December).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (2016) Devolution: A State of the Nation Assessment (LGIU).
   Google Scholar
• Whiteman, R. (2015), Changes to business rates: the devil will be in the detail. Guardian (6 October).
   Google Scholar