How hybridity has evolved in the governance of state-owned enterprises: evidence from Danish and Swedish passenger rail services from 1990 to 2015

References

• Alexandersson, G. (2010), The Accidental Deregulation: Essays on Reforms in the Swedish Bus and Railway Industries 1979–2009 (www.hhs.se)
   Google Scholar
• Alexius, S. and Örnberg, J. C. (2015), Mission(s) impossible? Configuring values in the governance of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28, 4/5, pp. 286–306. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2013), What organization theorists and public policy researchers can learn from one another: publicness theory as a case-in-point. Organization Studies, 34, 2, pp. 169–188. doi: 10.1177/0170840612473549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, D. G., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C. and Xu, K. (2015), State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 1, pp. 92–114. doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. and Pedersen, O. K. (2007), The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success: Denmark in the global economy. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 3, pp. 307–332. doi: 10.1177/0010414006286542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T. (2015), The return of the hierarchy. SOEs in marketisation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28, 4/5, pp. 307–321. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-04-2015-0084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T. (2016), State-Owned Enterprises as Institutional Market Actors in the Marketization of Public Service Provision: A Comparative Case Study of Danish and Swedish Passenger Rail 1990–2015 (http://openarchive.cbs.dk).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2003), Coping with complex leadership roles: the problematic redefintion of government-owned enterprises. Public Administration, 81, 4, pp. 803–831. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2011), Complexity and hybrid public administration— theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11, pp. 407–423. doi: 10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Traffic (2001), Sammenskrivning af aftaler mellem DSB og Trafikministeriet om fjern-og regionaltrafik udført som offentlig service i perioden 2000–2004 (Compilation of agreements between DSB and the Ministry of Traffic about the inter-regional and regional traffic run as public service in the periode 2000–2004) (Trafikministeriet)
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., Ferlie, E. and Van Gestel, N. (2015), Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93, 2, pp. 273–289. doi: 10.1111/padm.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E. (2007), Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1, pp. 25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florio, M. and Fecher, F. (2011), The future of public enterprises: contributions to a new discourse. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82, 4, pp. 361–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00445.x
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Papenfuß, U. and Tremblay, M.-S. (2015), Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28, 4/5, pp. 274–285. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-09-2015-0166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. and Thomasson, A. (2015), Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: the case of Copenhagen Malmö port. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 3, pp. 604–620. doi: 10.1177/0020852314548151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., Pierson, P. and Thelen, K. (2015), Drift and conversion: hidden faces of institutional change. In Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (Eds), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis (Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991), A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 1, pp. 3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankaanpää, J., Oulasvirta, L. and Wacker, J. (2014), Steering and monitoring model of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 7, pp. 409–423. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2013.858355
   Google Scholar
• Koppel, J. G. S. (2007), Political control for China’s state-owned enterprises: lessons from America’s experience with hybrid organizations. Governance, 20, 2, pp. 255–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, A. M., Hamel, L. M., Steel, D., Flood, P. C. and McKee, L. (2015), Hybrid healthcare governance for improvement? Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to public sector regulation. Public Administration, 93, 2, pp. 324–344. doi: 10.1111/padm.12118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, R. (2011), Public enterprise in the modern western world: an historical analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82, 4, pp. 375–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00447.x
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2014), The Size and Sectoral Distribution of SOEs in OECD and Partner Countries.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2011), Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis— New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. and Smith, S. R. (2015), Theorizing hybridity: institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: the case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93, 2, pp. 433–448. doi: 10.1111/padm.12105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (Eds.), (2005), Beyond Continuity, Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, C. H. (2005). New conditions for decision-making and co-ordination in transport? Corporatisation and division in the Danish railway sector. In Uth Thomsen, T. et al. (Eds), Social Perspectives on Mobility (Ashgate Publishing), pp. 155–180.
   Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (1994), The incorporated company as an instrument for government: a quest for comparative understanding. Governance, 7, 1, pp. 59–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.1994.tb00169.x
   Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (2011), Ownership as an instrument of policy and understanding in the public sphere: trends and research agenda. Policy Studies, 32, 3, pp. 183–197. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2011.561685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S. (2012), Comparing agencies across countries. In Verhoest, K. et al. (Eds), Government Agencies. Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries (Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G. and Lægreid, P. (Eds), (2012), Government Agencies. Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries (PalgraveMacmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Wettenhall, R. (2001), Public or private? Public corporations, companies and the decline of the middle ground. Public Organization Review, 1, 1, pp. 17–40. doi: 10.1023/A:1011516927634
   Google Scholar