References
- Alford, R. A. and Friedland, R. (1985), Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State and Democracy (Cambridge University Press).
- Coule, T. and Patmore, B. (2013), Institutional logics, institutional work, and public service innovation in non-profit organizations. Public Administration, 91, 4, pp. 980–997. doi: 10.1111/padm.12005
- Garrow, E. and Hasenfeld, Y. (2012), Managing conflicting institutional logics: social service versus market. In Gidron, B. and Hasenfeld, Y. (Eds), Social Enterprises: An Organizational Perspective (Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 121–143.
- Hasenfeld, Y. and Garrow, E. E. (2012), Nonprofit human-service organizations, social rights, and advocacy in a neoliberal welfare state. Social Service Review, 86, 2, pp. 295–322. doi: 10.1086/666391
- Kania, J. and Kramer, M. (2011), Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review (Winter).
- Meyer, R. and Hammerschmid, G. (2006), Public management reform: an identity project. Public Policy and Administration, 21, 1, pp. 99–115. doi: 10.1177/095207670602100107
- Miller, P., Kurunmäki, L. and O’Leary, T. (2008), Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 7, pp. 942–967. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.005
- OECD (2015), Integrating Social Services for Vulnerable Groups: Bridging Sectors for Better Service Delivery.
- Pache, A. C. and Santos, F. (2013), Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 4, pp. 972–1001.
- Roman, J. K., Kelly, A., Walsh, S. B. and Taxy, S. (2014), Pay for Success and Social Impact Bonds: Funding the Infrastructure for Evidence-Based Change (Urban Institute).
- Sanders, M. L. and McClellan, J. G. (2014), Being business-like while pursuing a social mission: acknowledging the inherent tensions in US nonprofit organizing. Organization, 21, 1, pp. 68–89. doi: 10.1177/1350508412464894
- Skelcher, C. (2015), An enterprising municipality? Municipalisation, corporatisation and the political economy of Birmingham City Council in the C19th and C21st. Paper presented at the IRSPM conference, Birmingham.
- Skelcher, C. and S. R. Smith (2015), Theorising hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities, the case of non-profits. Public Administration, 93, 2, pp. 433–448. doi: 10.1111/padm.12105
- Smith, S. R. and Lipsky, M. (1993), Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting (Harvard University Press).
- Smith, S. R. (2014), Hybridity and nonprofit organizations: the research agenda. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 11, pp. 1194–1508. doi: 10.1177/0002764214534675
- Smith, S. R. and Phillips, S. D. (2016), The changing and challenging environment of non-profit human services: implications for governance and program implementation. Non-Profit Policy Forum, 7, 1, pp. 63–76.
- Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012), The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process (Oxford University Press).