Performance management 40 years on: a review. Some key decisions and consequences

References

• Arndt, C. (2008), The politics of governance ratings. International Public Management Journal, 11, 3, pp. 275–297. doi: 10.1080/10967490802301278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audit Commission (2003), Waiting List Accuracy (The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. (2007), Instruction to Deliver: Tony Blair, Public Services and the Challenge of Achieving Targets (Politicos).
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. (2003), Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63, 5, pp. 586–606. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. (2014), The Performance Stat Potential: A Leadership Strategy for Producing Results (Brookings Institution Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, G. (2006), Setting targets for healthcare performance: lessons from a case study of the English NHS. National Institute Economic Review, 197, 1, pp. 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, G. (2009), Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: effects of different systems of performance measurement in the UK. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 172, 1, pp. 161–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00557.x
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006), What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public healthcare system. Public Administration, 84, 3, pp. 517–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, G. and Wilson, D. (2013), Does ‘naming and shaming’ work for schools and hospitals? Lessons from natural experiments following devolution in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 33, 4, pp. 245–252. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.799801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. (2008), Managing Performance: International Comparisons (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., Meier, K., O’Toole Jnr, L. and Walker, R. (Eds), Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management (Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Laegreid, P. and Stigen, I. (2006), Performance management and public sector reforms: the Norwegian hospital reform. International Public Management Journal, 9, 2, pp. 1–27. doi: 10.1080/10967490600766987
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, S., Bevan, G. and Mays, N. (2009), Funding and Performance of Healthcare Systems of the Four Countries of the UK Before and After Devolution (The Nuffield Trust).
   Google Scholar
• De Kool, D. (2008), Rational, political and cultural uses of performance monitors: the case of Dutch urban policy. In Van Dooren, W. and Van de Walle, S. (Eds), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 174–191.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, R. (2010), Independent Inquiry into the Care Provided by Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, January 2005–March 2009, HC375-1 (The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S. and Stimac, V. (2013), Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey. Public Money & Management, 33, 4, pp. 261–268. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.799803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healthcare Commission (2009), Investigation into Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. and Coates, P. (2004), Citizen-initiated performance assessment: the initial Iowa experience. Public Performance and Management Review, 27, 3, pp. 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Dixon, R. and Beeston, C. (2008), Rating the rankings: assessing international rankings of public service performance. International Public Management Journal, 11, 3, pp. 298–328. doi: 10.1080/10967490802301286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. and Dixon, R. (2010), The political payoff from performance target system: no-brainer or no-gainer? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, pp. i281–i298. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. (1832), The Poetical Works of Leigh Hunt (Ward Lock & Co.).
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), (2007), Datagob: Governance Indicator Database (http://www.iadb.org/datagob/).
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P., Joyce, P. and Donahue, A. (2003), Government Performance. Why Management Matters (John Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R., Goddard, M. and Smith, P. (2006), Public Services: Are Composite Measures a Robust Reflection of Performance in the Public Sector? (Centre for Health Economics, University of York), Research paper 16.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. and Talbot, C. (2008), UK parliamentary scrutiny of public service agreements: a challenge too far? In Van Dooren, W. and Van de Walle, S. (Eds), (2008), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M (2009), Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996–2008 (World Bank), Policy research working paper 4978.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. and Friedman, J. (2009), Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: an empirical examination of the distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 4, pp. 917–946. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. and Kelman, S. (2007), Reflections on 21st Century Government Management (IBM Center for the Business of Government).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. and Jäkel, T. (2013), Competing, collaborating or controlling? Comparing benchmarking in European local government. Public Money & Management, 33, 4, pp. 269–276. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.799815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S., Downe, J., Grace, C. and Nutley, S. (2013), New development: All change? Performance assessment regimes in UK local government. Public Money & Management, 33, 4, pp. 277–280. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.799816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. and Gupta, V. (1994), The performance paradox. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, pp. 309–369.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. (2008), The Dynamics of Performance Management (Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015), The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption (Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual (2012), GCSE English 2012, Ofqual Report 12/5225.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013), The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto (Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1985), Performance indicators: can practice be made perfect? Health and Social Services Journal (6 June), pp. 706–707.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006a), Performance information for democracy: the missing link? Evaluation, 12, 1, pp. 38–55. doi: 10.1177/1356389006064191
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006b), Performance management in practice: a comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1, pp. 25–44. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2011), ‘Moderation in all things’: international comparisons of governance quality. Financial Accountability & Management, 27, 4, pp. 437–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00532.x
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2013), The logics of performance management. Evaluation, 19, 4, pp. 346–363. doi: 10.1177/1356389013505040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H. and Waerness, M. (1999), Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2009), Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management (Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Harrison, S., Dowswell, G., Jerak-Zuiderent, J. and Bal, R. (2010), Performance regimes in healthcare: critical junctures and the logic of escalation in England and the Netherlands. Evaluation, 16, 1, pp. 13–29. doi: 10.1177/1356389009350026
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Chambers, N. (2013), Evidence based trust: a contradiction in terms? In Llewellyn, S., Brooks, S. and Mahon, A. (Eds), Trust and Confidence in Government and the Public Services (Routledge), pp. 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Dan, S. (2013), Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reform: a review of the European literature. Public Performance and Management Review, 37, 1, pp. 7–32. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576370101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2017), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis— Into the Age of Austerity, 4th edn (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Propper, C., Sutton, M., Whitnall, C. and Windmeijer, F. (2010), Incentives and targets in hospital care: a natural experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 3, pp. 301–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (1998), The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA): hydra-headed monster or flexible management tool? Public Administration Review, 58, 4, pp. 307–316. doi: 10.2307/977560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (2006), Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values (Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. (1995), On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18, pp. 277–310. doi: 10.1080/01900699508525011
   Google Scholar
• Sundström, G. (2006), Management by results: its origin and development in the case of the Swedish state. International Public Management Journal, 9, 4, pp. 399–427. doi: 10.1080/10967490601077178
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2010), Theories of Performance (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S. and Leeuw, F. (2002), The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance and Management Review, 25, 3, pp. 267–281. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. (2008), What services are public? What aspects are to be ranked? The case of ‘services of general interest’. International Public Management Journal, 11, 3, pp. 256–274. doi: 10.1080/10967490802301260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar