Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: Bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle

References

• Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients. From service-delivery to co-production. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2016). The ins and outs of outsourcing and insourcing: What have we learnt from the past 30 years? Public Money and Management, 36(1), 67–74. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2015.1093298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23(4), 1119–1138. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2013). We’re all in this together: Harnessing user and community co-production of public outcomes. In C. Staite (Ed.), Making sense of the future: Do we need a new model of public services? University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Willis, M., & Briggs, I. (2013). Strategic commissioning for local public services: Service improvement cycle or just going round in circles? Local Government Studies, 40(4), 533–559. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.805689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2016). What has co-production ever done for interactive governance? In J. Edelenboos, & I. van Meerkerk (Eds.), Critical reflections on interactive governance. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Quirk, B. (2017). Resilience in public administration: Moving from risk avoidance to assuring public policy outcomes through the resilience chain. In T. R. Klassen, D. Cepiku, & T. J. Lah (Eds.), Handbook of global public policy and administration. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Stoker, G., Loeffler, E., Jones, T., & Pinilla Roncancio, M. (2016). Activating collective coproduction for public services: Influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 47–68. doi: 10.1177/0020852314566009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production: how equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. new economics foundation and NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2015). Distinguishing different types of coproduction: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76, 427–435. doi: 10.1111/puar.12465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collieson, J. (2015). Prevention services in adult social care. British Library.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., Needham, C., Mangan, C., & Rees, J. (2017). Generating ‘good enough’ evidence for co-production. Evidence & Policy, 13(1), 135–51. doi: 10.1332/174426415X14440619792955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edson, M. (2012). A complex adaptive systems view of resilience in a project team. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 29(5), 499–516. doi: 10.1002/sres.2153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1997). Evaluating EU expenditure programmes: A practical guide. Directorate general for the budget.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B., & Alford, M. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739. doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, M., & Shirley, T. (2009). Co-production in public services: a new partnership with citizens. Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, L. (2017). Case study: Lambeth living well network. Retrieved from http://ideas-hub.org.uk/ideas-hub/case-study-lambeth-living-well-network/
   Google Scholar
• IPC. (2012). Joint Strategic commissioning: Learning development framework. IPC, Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Lambeth Collaborative (2016). Integrated personalised support alliance (IPSA), One year on (2015-16). Retrieved from http://lambethcollaborative.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/IPSA-communication-201516-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lambeth Collaborative (2018). Journey so far. Retrieved from http://lambethcollaborative.org.uk/lwn-journey
   Google Scholar
• LGA–CBI. (2009). Commissioning strategically for better public services across local government. Confederation of British Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., Taylor-Gooby, D., Bovaird, T., Hine-Hughes, F., & Wilkes, L. (2012). Making health and social care personal and local: From mass production to co-production. Governance International and Local Governance Information Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. doi: 10.1111/puar.12765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, M. (2014). Outcomes-based commissioning and public service transformation in mosaic clubhouse lambeth. Governance International Case Study. Retrieved from http://www.govint.org/good-practice/case-studies/outcomes-based-commissioning-and-public-service-transformation-in-mosaic-clubhouse-lambeth/
   Google Scholar
• NESTA. (2011). Co-production Phase 2: Taking co-production to scale in services for patients with long term health conditions. Strategic Partners—Call for Proposals. NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, D. (2013). From crisis management to prevention: How the lambeth living well collaborative is driving the transformation of mental health services. Governance International Case Study. Retrieved from http://www.govint.org/good-practice/case-studies/from-crisis-management-to-prevention-the-lambeth-living-well-collaborative/
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Third Sector. (2006). Partnership in public services: An action plan for the third sector involvement. Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24, S31–S47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petsoulas, C., et al. (2015). Primary care-led commissioning and public involvement in the english national health service. lessons from the past. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 16(3), 289–303. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCIE. (2015). Co-production in social care: What it is and how to do it. Social Care Institute for Excellence, update of 2013 publication.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., & Tuurnas, S. (2018). The roles of the professional in co-production and co-creation processes. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation. Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). The dark side of co-creation and co-production. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation. Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C., & Steen, T. (2016). Why engage in co-production of public services/mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 28–46. doi: 10.1177/0020852314566007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, B., & McCulloch, T. (2012). Co-producing criminal justice executive summary. Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, I., Bovaird, T., Brown, H., Allen, K., Dickinson, H., England, J., & Glasby, J. (2013). Designing whole-systems commissioning: Lessons from the english experience. Journal of Care Services Management, 6(2), 83–92. doi: 10.1179/1750168713Y.0000000012
   Google Scholar