Together we measure: Improving public service outcomes via the co-production of performance measurement

References

• Agyemang, G., O'Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Awumbila, M. (2017). Seeking ‘conversations for accountability’: Mediating the impact of non-governmental organization (NGO) upward accountability processes. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(5), 982–1007. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-02-2015-1969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., Brudney, J. L., & Yang, K. (2010). Introduction to the symposium: Accountability and performance measurement: The evolving role of nonprofits in the hollow state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 565–570. doi: 10.1177/0899764010369662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N., & Young, D. W. (2002). Management Control in Non-Profit Organisations (7th Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Awio, G., Northcott, D., & Lawrence, S. (2011). Social capital and accountability in grass-roots NGOs: The case of the Ugandan community-led HIV/AIDS initiative. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(1), 63–92. doi: 10.1108/09513571111098063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. M. (2012). The potential of outcome measurement for strengthening nonprofits’ accountability to beneficiaries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1224–1244. doi: 10.1177/0899764012454684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2007). Assessing the quality of local governance: A case study of public services. Public Money & Management, 27(4), 293–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2017). Co-production in Government: Why, When and How? Wellington, New Zealand: The Policy Project.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Flemig, S., Loeffler, E., & Osborne, S. (2017). Debate: Co-production of public services and outcomes. Public Money & Management, 37(5), 363–364. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1294866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2013). Towards charity accountability: narrowing the gap between provision and needs? Public Management Review, 15(7), 945–968. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.757349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2017). The donor-beneficiary charity accountability paradox: A tale of two stakeholders. Public Money & Management, 37(3), 157–164. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1281629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., Kudrna, L., & Stone, A. (2016). The measure matters: An investigation of evaluative and experience-based measures of wellbeing in time use data. Social Indicators Research, 134(1), 57–73. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1429-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What Impact? A Framework for Measuring the Scale and Scope of Social Performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79–119. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, R. E. (1995). Accountability in organizational life: Problem or opportunity for nonprofits? Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6(2), 181–195. doi: 10.1002/nml.4130060207
   Google Scholar
• Horne, M., & Shirley, T. (2009). Co-production in public services: A new partnership with citizens. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H., Houten, T. V., Plantz, M. C., & Taylor, M. (1996). Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N., & Eden, R. (2000). A study of the coordination of mission, objectives and targets in U.K. executive agencies. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 175–191. doi: 10.1006/mare.2000.0127
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N., & McConville, D. (2018). Making charity effectiveness transparent: Building a stakeholder-focused framework of reporting. Financial Accountability & Management, 34(2), 133–147. doi: 10.1111/faam.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., & Wright, N. S. (2010). Does performance measurement improve strategic decision making? Findings from a national survey of nonprofit social service agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 571–587. doi: 10.1177/0899764009359942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (2011). Ontario’s Aging Population: Challenges and Opportunities. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Trillium Foundation. Retrieved from: http://www.ruralontarioinstitute.ca/file.aspx?id=c31f2ff2-cb12-4d47-8cce-165196c8734a.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. doi: 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxham, C. (2014). Understanding third sector performance measurement system design: a literature review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(6), 704–726. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2013-0143
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, B., & Boomsma, R. (2015). The co-construction of NGO accountability: Aligning imposed and felt accountability in NGO-funder accountability relationships. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 36–68. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study of Amnesty Ireland. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7), 801–824. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, S. (2017). Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, 21–41. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhill, J. C., & Williamson, D. (2001). Mission impossible? Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 371–386. doi: 10.1002/nml.11309
   Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. (2015). New Zealand in Profile: 2015. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from www.stats.govt.nz.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. E. (2011). The role of funders in driving nonprofit performance measurement and use in strategic management. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(1), 54–78. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576350103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., & O'Dwyer, B. (2010). NGO accountability and sustainability issues in the changing global environment. Public Management Review, 12(4), 475–486. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.496258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. K. Kellogg Foundation (2004). Using Logic Models to Bring Together Planning, Evaluation, and Action: Logic Model Development Guide. Retrieved from https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., & Northcott, D. (2018). Unveiling the role of identity accountability in shaping charity outcome measurement practices. The British Accounting Review, 50(2), 214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Northcott, D., & Sinclair, R. (2017). The accountability information needs of key charity funders. Public Money & Management, 37(3), 173–180. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1281649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar