How top civil servants decide on cutbacks: A qualitative study into the role of values

References

• Andersen, L. B., Jorgensen, T. B., Kjeldsen, A. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrangbaek, K. (2013). Public values and public service motivation: Conceptual and empirical relationships. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 292–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behaviour: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in élite. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Public management decision making: Effects of decision content. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 553–565.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H. S., & Gao, J. (2013). Can the same key open different locks? Administrative values underlying performance measurement in China. Public Administration, 91(2), 366–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, R. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration and Society, 48(9), 1101–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, M. J., & Klase, K. (2009). Fiscal retrenchment in state budgeting: Revisiting cutback management in a new era. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(7), 593–619.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J.W., Raudla, R., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2016). The impact of greater centralization on the relevance of performance information in european governments during the fiscal crisis. Administration and Society, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680055.
   Google Scholar
• Dunsire, A., & Hood, C. (1989). Cutback management in public bureaucracies. Popular theories and observed outcomes in whitehall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Gutiérrez, M., & Van de Walle, S. (2018). Equity or Efficiency? Explaining public officials’ values. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassberg, A. (1978). Organizational responses to municipal budget decreases. Public Administration Review, 38(4), 325–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, M., & Mayer, R. (1986). Organization theory for public administration. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting élite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Wright, M. (1981). From decrementalism to quantum cuts? In C. Hood, & M. Wright (Eds.), Big governments in hard times (pp. 199–227). Oxford: Martin Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015). Europe managing the crisis: The politics of fiscal consolidation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2015). Politics of fiscal consolidation in Europe: A comparative analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 562–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, T., Hartley, J., Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2015). Feeling the squeeze: Public employees’ experiences of cutback-and innovation-related organizational changes following a national announcement of budget reductions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1279–1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, C. (1978). Organizational decline and cutback management. Public Administration Review, 38(4), 316–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, C. (1985). Police management in the 1980s: From decrementalism to strategic thinking. Public Administration Review, 45(2), 691–700.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, C., Rubin, I. S., & Wolohojian, G. G. (1981). Resource scarcity and the reform model: The management of retrenchment in Cincinnati and Oakland. Public Adminisration Review, 41(6), 619–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, C., Rubin, I. S., & Wolohojian, G. G. (1982). Managing organizational retrenchment preconditions, deficiencies, and adaptations in the public sector. Administration and Society, 14(1), 101–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, S. T., Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTighe, J. J. (1979). Management strategies to deal with shrinking resources. Public Adminisration Review, 39(1), 86–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okun, A. M. (1975). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overmans, J. F. A., & Noordegraaf, M. (2014). Managing austerity: Rhetorical and real responses to fiscal stress in local government. Public Money & Management, 34(2), 99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2010). Cuts and reforms — Public services as we move into a new era. Society and Economy, 32(1), 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. C. N., & Whetsell, T. A. (2018). Conceptualizing the landscape of decision making for complex problem solving. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(14), 1132–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randma-Liiv, T., & Kickert, W. (2016). The impact of the fiscal crisis on public administration reforms: Comparison of 14 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 6(2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., Douglas, J. W., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2015). The impact of fiscal crisis on decision-making processes in european governments: Dynamics of a centralization cascade. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 842–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., Savi, R., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015). Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s: Taking stock. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 433–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 30(1), 92–113.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. E. T., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2017). A change management perspective on public sector cutback management: Towards a framework for analysis. Public Management Review, 19(10), 1538–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2004). Managerial values and accountability pressures: Challenges of crisis and disaster. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(C), 1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1988), States and markets: An introduction to international political economy. London: Pint.
   Google Scholar
• Toonen, T. A. J. (1998). Networks, management and institutions: Public administration as ‘normal science’. Public Administration, 76(2), 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Voet, J., & Vermeeren, B. (2016). Change management in hard times: Can change management mitigate the negative relationship between cutbacks and the organizational commitment and work engagement of public sector employees? The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 230–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2014). Élite ethics: Comparing public values prioritization between administrative élites and political élites. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(14), 1030–1043.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Wal, Z. (2013). Mandarins versus Machiavellians? On differences between work motivations of administrative and political élites. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 749–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., & Huberts, L. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: results of an empirical study on public and private sector organizational values. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), 264–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & de Graaf, G. (2015). From Galaxies to Universe. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witesman, E. M., & Walters, L. (2015). Modeling public decision preferences using context-specific value hierarchies. American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 86–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witesman, E. M., & Walters, L. (2014). Public service values: A new approach to the study of motivation in the public sphere. Public Administration, 92(2), 375–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar