1,863
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How top civil servants decide on cutbacks: A qualitative study into the role of values

ORCID Icon

References

  • Andersen, L. B., Jorgensen, T. B., Kjeldsen, A. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrangbaek, K. (2013). Public values and public service motivation: Conceptual and empirical relationships. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 292–311.
  • Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behaviour: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220.
  • Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in élite. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679–682.
  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Bozeman, B., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Public management decision making: Effects of decision content. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 553–565.
  • Chan, H. S., & Gao, J. (2013). Can the same key open different locks? Administrative values underlying performance measurement in China. Public Administration, 91(2), 366–380.
  • De Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, R. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration and Society, 48(9), 1101–1127.
  • Dougherty, M. J., & Klase, K. (2009). Fiscal retrenchment in state budgeting: Revisiting cutback management in a new era. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(7), 593–619.
  • Douglas, J.W., Raudla, R., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2016). The impact of greater centralization on the relevance of performance information in european governments during the fiscal crisis. Administration and Society, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680055.
  • Dunsire, A., & Hood, C. (1989). Cutback management in public bureaucracies. Popular theories and observed outcomes in whitehall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fernandez-Gutiérrez, M., & Van de Walle, S. (2018). Equity or Efficiency? Explaining public officials’ values. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 25–34.
  • Glassberg, A. (1978). Organizational responses to municipal budget decreases. Public Administration Review, 38(4), 325–332.
  • Harmon, M., & Mayer, R. (1986). Organization theory for public administration. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting élite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.
  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
  • Hood, C., & Wright, M. (1981). From decrementalism to quantum cuts? In C. Hood, & M. Wright (Eds.), Big governments in hard times (pp. 199–227). Oxford: Martin Robertson.
  • Jorgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354–381.
  • Kickert, W., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015). Europe managing the crisis: The politics of fiscal consolidation. London: Routledge.
  • Kickert, W., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2015). Politics of fiscal consolidation in Europe: A comparative analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 562–584.
  • Kiefer, T., Hartley, J., Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2015). Feeling the squeeze: Public employees’ experiences of cutback-and innovation-related organizational changes following a national announcement of budget reductions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1279–1305.
  • Levine, C. (1978). Organizational decline and cutback management. Public Administration Review, 38(4), 316–325.
  • Levine, C. (1985). Police management in the 1980s: From decrementalism to strategic thinking. Public Administration Review, 45(2), 691–700.
  • Levine, C., Rubin, I. S., & Wolohojian, G. G. (1981). Resource scarcity and the reform model: The management of retrenchment in Cincinnati and Oakland. Public Adminisration Review, 41(6), 619–628.
  • Levine, C., Rubin, I. S., & Wolohojian, G. G. (1982). Managing organizational retrenchment preconditions, deficiencies, and adaptations in the public sector. Administration and Society, 14(1), 101–136.
  • Lyons, S. T., Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605–618.
  • McTighe, J. J. (1979). Management strategies to deal with shrinking resources. Public Adminisration Review, 39(1), 86–90.
  • Okun, A. M. (1975). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Overmans, J. F. A., & Noordegraaf, M. (2014). Managing austerity: Rhetorical and real responses to fiscal stress in local government. Public Money & Management, 34(2), 99–106.
  • Pollitt, C. (2010). Cuts and reforms — Public services as we move into a new era. Society and Economy, 32(1), 17–31.
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N., & Whetsell, T. A. (2018). Conceptualizing the landscape of decision making for complex problem solving. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(14), 1132–1144.
  • Randma-Liiv, T., & Kickert, W. (2016). The impact of the fiscal crisis on public administration reforms: Comparison of 14 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 6(2), 1–18.
  • Raudla, R., Douglas, J. W., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2015). The impact of fiscal crisis on decision-making processes in european governments: Dynamics of a centralization cascade. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 842–852.
  • Raudla, R., Savi, R., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015). Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s: Taking stock. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 433–456.
  • Rutgers, M. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 30(1), 92–113.
  • Schmidt, J. E. T., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2017). A change management perspective on public sector cutback management: Towards a framework for analysis. Public Management Review, 19(10), 1538–1555.
  • Schwartz, R., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2004). Managerial values and accountability pressures: Challenges of crisis and disaster. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 79–102.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(C), 1–65.
  • Strange, S. (1988), States and markets: An introduction to international political economy. London: Pint.
  • Toonen, T. A. J. (1998). Networks, management and institutions: Public administration as ‘normal science’. Public Administration, 76(2), 229–252.
  • Van der Voet, J., & Vermeeren, B. (2016). Change management in hard times: Can change management mitigate the negative relationship between cutbacks and the organizational commitment and work engagement of public sector employees? The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 230–252.
  • Van der Wal, Z. (2014). Élite ethics: Comparing public values prioritization between administrative élites and political élites. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(14), 1030–1043.
  • Van Der Wal, Z. (2013). Mandarins versus Machiavellians? On differences between work motivations of administrative and political élites. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 749–759.
  • Van Der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482.
  • Van der Wal, Z., & Huberts, L. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: results of an empirical study on public and private sector organizational values. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), 264–285.
  • Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & de Graaf, G. (2015). From Galaxies to Universe. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28.
  • Witesman, E. M., & Walters, L. (2015). Modeling public decision preferences using context-specific value hierarchies. American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 86–105.
  • Witesman, E. M., & Walters, L. (2014). Public service values: A new approach to the study of motivation in the public sphere. Public Administration, 92(2), 375–405.