Linking municipal Best Value and market performance: the Portuguese experience

References

• Andrews, R. (2014). Performance management and public service improvement. Public Policy Institute for Wales. PPIW Report, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. J. (2001). Public sector economics – theory, policy and practice (2nd edition). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. UK: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C., Jørgensen, L. L., Norn, M. T., & Vad, T. B. (2009). Public sector innovation index—a diagnostic tool for measuring innovative performance and capability in public sector organizations. Exploratory project commissioned by NESTA, Aarhus: Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Boex, J. (2010). Localizing the MDGs: Unlocking the potential of the local public sector to engage in development and poverty reduction, IDG Working Paper 2010-5. Washington: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Boex, J., & Edwards, B. (2014). Localizing public services and development: The local public sector’s role in achieving development goals in health and education. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M., Ball, A., & Francis, G. (2001). Benchmarking as a tool for the modernisation of local government. Financial Accountability & Management, 17(4), 321–329.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., & Chen, A. (2007). Performance targets and public service improvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 455–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschor, E. (2013). Performance management in the public sector: Past, current and future trends. Tékhne, 11(1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (1998). The market orientation-performance link: Some evidence from the public sector and universities. Journal Is positive of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 6(1), 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (1999). Market orientation and performance in the public sector: The role of organizational commitment. Journal of Global Marketing, 12(3), 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., Fernandes, M. J., Camões, P., & Jorge, S. (2016). Anuário financeiro dos municípios portugueses 2015. Lisboa: Ordem dos Contabilistas Certificados.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., Fernandes, M., Lambert, V., & Lapsley, I. (2006). Measuring fire service performance: A comparative study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2), 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity in US federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Innovation in the public sector: Enabling better performance, driving new directions. Report to the Australian Public Service Management Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2010). Empowering change: Fostering innovation in the Australian public service. Report to the Australian Public Service Management Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Cowper, J., & Samuels, M. (1997). Performance benchmarking in the public sector: The UK experience. In OECD (Ed.), Benchmarking, evaluation and strategic management in the public sector. Papers presented at the 1996 meeting of the performance management network of the OECD’s public management service (pp. 11–31). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J., & Doh, J. (2000). Identifying who matter: Mapping key players in multiple environments. California Management Review, 42(2), 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, J., Reynolds, P., & Lancaster, G. (1998). A marketing strategy for public sector organizations compelled to operate in a compulsory competitive tendering environment. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(7), 583–595.
   Google Scholar
• De Araújo, J. F. F. E. (2001). Improving public service delivery: The crossroads between NPM and traditional bureaucracy. Public Administration, 79(4), 915–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions). (1998a). Modern local government: In touch with the people. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DETR. (1998b). Modernizing local government: Improving local services through best value. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, C. (1999). Valuing the benefits of publicly provided health care: Does ‘ability to pay’ preclude the use of ‘willingness to pay’? Social Science and Medicine, 49, 551–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2014). The use of ICT for open government in US municipalities: Perceptions of chief administrative officers. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, M., & Spencer, D. (2001). Best value and social inclusion, local authorities and social exclusion network. Research Paper 8, June 2001. UK: Local Government Information Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Pechuan, I., Exposito-Langa, M., & Tomas-Miquel, J. V. (2013). International entrepreneurship in SMEs: A study of influencing factors in the textile industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(1), 45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles | London | New Deli | Singapore | Washington DC: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul, M. (1997). The new public Administration: Management innovations in government: Summary. Public Administration & Development, 17(1), 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 54, April, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzmin, A., LoÈffler, E., Klages, H., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1999). Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors: Towards learning for agency effectiveness. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), 121–144.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, A. (2003). Marketing in the public sector: Towards a typology of public services. Marketing Theory, 3(4), 427–445.
   Google Scholar
• Magd, H., & Curry, A. (2003). Benchmarking: Achieving best value in public sector organizations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(3), 261–286.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2000). Implementing ‘Best Value’: Local public services in transition. Public Administration, 78(1), 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurya, U. K., Mishra, P., Anand, S., & Kumar, N. (2005). Corporate identity, customer orientation and performance of SMEs. Exploring the linkage. IIMB Management Review, 27(3), 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Moffett, S., Walker, T., & McAdam, R. (2013). Best value and performance management inspired change within UK councils: A knowledge management perspective. In Y. Al-Bastaki, & A. Shajera (Eds.), Building a competitive public sector with knowledge management strategy (pp. 199–226). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, October.
   Google Scholar
• Mwita, J. I. (2000). Performance management model: A systems-based approach to public service quality. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(1), 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L., & Henderson, S. (2005). Best value and the market orientation of UK recreation centres. Local Government Studies, 31(2), 237–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettleton, B. (2000). Best value and direct services. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, 12(272), 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, L., & Donaldson, T. (1999). Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 619–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Stephanie Tailby, S., Andrew Danford, A., Paul Stewart, P., & Upchurch, M. (2005). Best value and workplace partnership in local government. Personnel Review, 34(6), 713–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott-Kemmis, D. (2009). Promoting innovation in the public sector: Case studies. Management Advisory Committee Report 9—Annex 1.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, R. J. (2014). Public sector innovation: A top priority for European policy. In Delivering public services for the future: How europe can lead public sector transformation. A collection of essays on the opportunity and challenge of public service in the digital age. European Centre for Government Transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, S., & Wilkins, S. (1993). Cheap rubbish? Competitive tendering and contracting out in refuse collection–1981–88. Fiscal Studies, 14(3), 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Tonnisson, K., & Wilson, J. (2007). Best value in transitional countries? Public Management Review, 9(1), 87–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, L., & Pina, V. (2002). An empiricial study about new public management developments in three European union cultural categories: Germanic, nordic and napoleonic countries. In Proceedings of the 25th european accounting association congress. Denmark: Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K. (2005). Effects of autonomy, performance contracting, and competition on the performance of a public agency: A case study. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. R. A. N., Shoham, A., Schwabsky, N., & Ruvio, A. (2008). Public sector innovation for europe: A multinational eight—country exploration of citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration, 86(2), 307–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., & Garvis, D. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 469–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar