How do network characteristics influence network managers’ choice of strategies?

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., & Torenvlied, R. (2013). Public management and network specificity: Effects of colleges’ ties with professional organizations on graduates’ labour market success and satisfaction. Public Management Review, 15, 522–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. A., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure. The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. A., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. (1992). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared power world. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D. (2013). Surveys in social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., Klijn, E.-H., & Steijn, B. (2011). Managers in governance networks: How to reach good outcomes? International Public Management Journal, 14, 420–444. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2011.656055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrmann, J. R., & Stinson, B. L. (1999). Joint fact-finding and the use of technical experts. In L. Susskind, S. McKearnan, & J. Thomas-Larmer (Eds.), The consensus building handbook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage, R. W., & Mandell, M. P. (Eds.). (1990). Strategies for managing intergovernmental policies and networks. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hanf, K. I., & Scharpf, F. W. (Eds.). (1978). Interorganizational policy making: Limits to co-ordination and central control. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, F. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions. A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1–2), 46–74.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Juenke, E. G. (2005). Management tenure and network time: How experience affects bureaucratic dynamics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 113–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2010). Trust in governance networks: Its impact and outcomes. Administration and Society, 42(2), 193–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., Steijn, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2010). The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88(4), 1063–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., Ysa, T., Sierra, V., Berman, E., Edelenbos, J., & Chen, D. (2015). The influence of network management and complexity on network performance in Taiwan, Spain and The Netherlands. Public Management Review, 17(5), 736–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2007). Consensus and conflict in policy networks: Too much or too little. In E. Sørensen, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Labianca, G., Brass, D., & Gray, B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary-spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and the use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2011). The future of network governance: Strength in diversity and synthesis. Public Administration, 89(4), 1221–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccio, L., & Cristofoli, D. (2018). How to support the endurance of long-term networks: The pivotal role of the network manager. Public Administration, 95, 1060–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. (1990). Network management: Strategic behavior in the public sector. In R. W. Gage, & M. P. Mandell (Eds.), Strategies for managing intergo­vernmental policies and networks. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. (Ed.). (2001). Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management. Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Markovic, J. (2017). Contingencies and organizing principles in public networks. Public Management Review, 19(3), 361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., & Agranoff, R. (2011). The limitations of public management networks. Public Administration, 89(2), 265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2007). Modelling public management: Empirical analysis of the management-performance nexus. Public Administration Review, 9(4), 503–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L. J. (1988). Strategies for intergovernmental management: Implementing programs in interorganizational networks. Journal of Public Administration, 11(4), 417–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, C., Langley, A., Béland, F., & Denis, J. L. (2007). Governance, power, and mandated collaboration in an interorganizational network. Administration & Society, 39(2), 150–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. L., & Whetten, D. A. (Eds.). (1982). Interorganizational co-ordination: Theory, research, and implementation. Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, A., & Carlsson, L. (2008). The performance of policy networks: The relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 497–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1978). Interorganizational policy studies: Issues, concepts and perspectives. In K. I. Hanf, & F. W. Scharpf (Eds.), Interorganizational policy making: Limits to co-ordination and central control. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K. B. (2001). Email survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2), 1. January 2001, JCMC621, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., & Edelenbos, J. (2014). The effects of boundary-spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: Findings from survey research on urban development projects in The Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 47(1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2015). Connective management and governance network performance: The mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in The Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(4), 746–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willem, A., & Lucidarme, S. (2014). Pitfalls and challenges for trust in collaborative networks. Public Administration Review, 16(5), 733–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary Spanners. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ysa, T., Sierra, V., & Esteve, M. (2014). Determinants of network outcomes: The impact of management strategies. Public Administration, 92(3), 636–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar