New development: Complexity and rhetoric in social impact investment

References

• Araujo, L. (2007). Markets, market-making and marketing. Marketing Theory, 7(3), 211–226. doi: 10.1177/1470593107080342
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, L., Kjellberg, H., & Spencer, R. (2008). Market practices and forms: Introduction to the special issue. Marketing Theory, 8(1), 5–14. doi: 10.1177/1470593107086481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation “Came to Be”: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653. doi: 10.1017/S004727941600009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannick, M., & Goldman, P. (2012). Priming the pump: The case for a sector based approach to impact investing. Omidyar Network.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Bowie, N. E. (Eds.). (2004). Ethical theory and business (7th edn). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Beinhocker, E. (2006). The origin of wealth: Evolution, Complexity and the radical remaking of economics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengo, I. (2018). Debate: Impact measurement and social public procurement. Public Money and Management, 38(5), 391–392. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1471817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blacklock, J., & Antadze, N. (2018). The legalisation of birth control in North America. In F. Westley, K. McGowan, & O. Tjornbo (Eds.), The evolution of social innovation: Building resilience through transitions. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, E., & Savell, L. (2010). Towards a new social economy: Blended value creation through social impact bonds. London: Social Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G., Christensen, L., Conrad, C., & Lair, D. (2004). Corporate rhetoric as organziational discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 70–103). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., Graham, C., & Himick, D. (2016). Social impact bonds: The securitization of the homeless. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55, 63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmiston, D., & Nicholls, A. (2018). Social impact bonds: The role of private capital in outcome-based commissioning. Journal of Social Policy, 47(1), 57–76. doi: 10.1017/S0047279417000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, S., Kjellberg, H., & Spencer, R. (2012). Shaping exchanges, building markets. Consumption Markets and Culture, 15(2), 133–147. doi: 10.1080/10253866.2012.654955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvie, D., & Ogman, R. (2019). The broken promises of the social investment market. Environment and Planning A, 0(0), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Helbing, D., Brockmann, D., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Blanke, U., Woolley-Meza, O., … Perc, M. (2015). Saving human lives: What complexity science and information systems can contribute. Journal of Statistical Physics, 158(3), 735–781. doi: 10.1007/s10955-014-1024-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, N., Sinclair, S., Roy, M., Huckfield, L., & Donaldson, C. (2013). Social impact bonds: A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(3), 247–257. doi: 10.1332/204674313X13812372137921
   Google Scholar
• Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations: The application of complexity theory to organizations, ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. Burlington: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2018). SMASH - Using market shaping to design new strategies for innovation, value creation and growth. Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., Paton, R., & Emerson, J. (2015). Social finance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2012). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K., & Cilliers, P. (2001). What is complexity science? A view from different directions. Emergence, 3(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1207/S15327000EM0301_02
   Google Scholar
• Schinckus, C. (2017). Financial innovation as a potential force for a positive social change: The challenging future of social impact bonds. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 727–736. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007, November). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Zivkovic, S. (2017). Addressing food insecurity: A systemic innovation approach. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(3), 234–250. doi: 10.1108/SEJ-11-2016-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar