Alignment of strategy and structure in local government

References

• Aldrich, H., & Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 165–198.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. (2012a). Strategic management and public service performance. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2009). Strategy formulation, strategy content and performance. Public Management Review, 11(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr, & Walker, R. M. (2012b). Vertical strategic alignment and public service performance. Public Administration, 90(1), 77–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015). Reflections on the 2013 decade award—’exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited’ ten years later. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 497–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2010). Does political change affect senior management turnover? An empirical analysis of top-tier local authorities in England. Public Administration, 88(1), 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (1993). Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(6), 489–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. M., DeSanctis, G., & Obel, B. (2006). Organizational design: A step-by-step approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheon, O., & An, S. H. (2017). Blowing in the wind: A study for granger causality between managerial strategy and organizational performanc. Public Management Review, 19(5), 686–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, C. R., & Karl, J. B. (2016). The effect of product diversification strategies on the performance of health insurance conglomerates. Applied Economics, 48(3), 190–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963/1992). A behavioral theory of the firm. Second edition. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., & Desmidt, S. (2014). A state of research on strategic management in the public sector: An analysis of the empirical evidence. In P. Joyce, & A. Drumaux (Eds.), Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• George, B., Desmidt, S., & De Moyer, J. (2016). Strategic decision quality in Flemish municipalities. Public Money and Management, 36(5), 317–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., Desmidt, S., Nielsen, P. A., & Baekgaard, M. (2017). Rational planning and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: Replication and extension of a survey experiment. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1251–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). We know the yin—but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravenhorst, K. M. B., Werkman, R. A., & Boonstra, J. J. (2003). The change capacity of organizations: General assessment and five configurations. Applied Psychology—An International Review, 52(1), 83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R. (1987). Managerial strategies in local government. Public Administration, 65(4), 295–312.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. I. (2018). Organizational change and change management. Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. I. (2020). Perspektiver på “nye” kommune-Norge. Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., & John, P. (2007). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 17(4), 567–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2016). Strategic planning and management in local government in Norway: Status after three decades. Scandinavian Political Studies, 39(4), 333–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2018). Impacts of strategic planning and management in municipal government: An analysis of subjective survey and objective production and efficiency measures in Norway. Public Management Review, 20(3), 397–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. (2017). Strategic leadership in the public services. Second edition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T., Oh, H., & Swaminathan, A. (2006). Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 704–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Mens, G., Hannan, M. T., & Polos, L. (2015). Age-related structural inertia: A distance-based approach. Organization Science, 26(3), 756–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958/1993). Organizations. Second edition. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. Jr. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., Boyne, G. A., Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2010). Alignment and results: Testing the interaction effects of strategy, structure, and environment from Miles and Snow. Administration and Society, 42(2), 160–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 515–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1984). Fit, failure and the hall of fame. California Management Review, 26(3), 10–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (2003 [1978]). Organizational strategy, Structure, and Process. Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1988). Relating porter business strategies to environment and structure—Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Greenwood, R., & Prakash, R. (2009). What happened to organization theory? Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(4), 273–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). Structure of unstructured decision-processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perretti, F., & Negro, G. (2006). Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 759–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (2013). You’re still the same: Why theories of power hold over time and across contexts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M., & Lidstrom, A. (2007). Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance, 20(4), 609–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1947/1997). Administrative behavior: Study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Fourth edition. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967/2003). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2015). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. (2017). Trust as a key for strategic management? The relevance of council–administration relations for NPM-related reforms in German local governments. Public Management Review, 19(10), 1399–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1/2), 72–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar