New development: Institutions, ‘new civic leadership’ and being ‘truly civic’—some tensions in co-production debates

References

• Barnett, R. (2007). Recovering the civic university. In L. McIlrath, & I. MacLabhrainn (Eds.), Higher education and civic engagement: International perspectives (pp. 25–36). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, A., Ayres, S., Clower, T., Faller, F., Sancino, A., & Sotarauta, M. (2019). Place leadership and regional economic development: A framework for cross-regional analysis. Regional Studies, 53(2), 171–182. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1447662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Towards the knowledge democracy? Knowledge production and the civic role of the university. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(5), 467–479. doi: 10.1007/s11217-007-9056-0
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Flemig, S., Loeffler, E., & Osborne, S. P. (2019). How far have we come with co-production—and what’s next? Public Money and Management, 39(4), 229–232. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, A., & Liddle, J. (2018). Evolving public sector roles in the leadership of place-based partnerships: From controlling to influencing policy? Regional Studies, 52(1), 145–155. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1346369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R., & Head, B. W. (2019). Navigating tensions in co-production: A missing link in leadership for public value. Public Administration, 97(2), 250–263. doi: 10.1111/padm.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussu, S., & Galanti, M. T. (2018). Facilitating coproduction: The role of leadership in coproduction initiatives in the UK. Policy and Society, 37(3), 347–367. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1414355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P., Owen, A., Cutter, J., Dymski, G., & Unsworth, R. (2018). Recasting urban governance through leeds city lab. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42, 226–243. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto, R. A. (2014). Civic leadership. In R. A. W. Rhodes, & P. ‘t Hart (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political leadership (pp. 347–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2019). Independent panel report to the review of post-18 education and funding, (Augar Review), CP117, London.
   Google Scholar
• Exeter Citizens Advice. (2015). Exeter: Town vs Gown? The housing challenges faced by a university city. Retrieved from https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/Global/CitizensAdvice/Housing%20Publications/Dispatches%20from%20the%20front%20lines%20of%20the%20housing%20crisis%20(2%20Exeter).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gibeau, E., Reid, W., & Langley, A. (2017). Co-leadership, contexts, considerations and conditions. In J. Storey, J. Hartley, J.-L. Denis, P. ‘t Hart, & D. Ulrich (Eds.), The Routledge companion to leadership (pp. 225–241). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., & Vallance, P. (2011). The civic university and the leadership of place, CURDS. UK: Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J. (2009). Re-inventing the civic university. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Grogan, P. (2014). An emerging civic leadership model: A community foundation's distinctive value proposition. In T. Mazany, & D. C. Perry (Eds.), Here for Good : Community foundations and the challenges of the 21st century (pp. 219–230). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R., & Howard, J. (2013). Place-Based leadership and public service innovation. Local Government Studies, 39(1), 47–70. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2012.693076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. (2018). British universities- the sleeping giants of place-based leadership? People, Place and Policy Online, 12(1), 1–7. Retrieved from https://extra.shu.ac.uk/ppp-online/alternatives-paper-british-universities-the-sleeping-giants-of-place-based-leadership/. doi: 10.3351/ppp.2018.4889247933
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. (2019). The new civic leadership: Place and the co-creation of public innovation. Public Money and Management, 39(4), 271–279. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrow, J., & Jung, T. (2017). Debate: Collapsing collegiality in universities’ fundraising? Public Money & Management, 37(6), 434. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1344026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrow, J., & Jung, T. (2016). Philanthropy and community development: The vital signs of community foundation? Community Development Journal, 51(1), 132–152. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsv056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., Revell, P., & Escobar, O. (2018). Transforming communities? Exploring the roles of community anchor organizations in public service reform, local democracy, community resilience and social change, What Works, Scotland, Retrieved from http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2018/05/WWSExploringTheRolesOfCommunityAnchorOrganizationsInPublicServiceReform.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Research Centre. (2018). A regional innovation impact assessment framework for universities JRC Discussion Paper. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, T., Harrow, J., & Leat, D. (2018). Mapping philanthropic foundations’ characteristics: Towards an international integrative framework of foundation types. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(5), 893–917. doi: 10.1177/0899764018772135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, S. (2019). Public policy-making, fundraisers and philanthropic giving in UK higher education in the 21st century: the examples of two policy incentives. PhD thesis, University of Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, M., & Walter, J. (2017). Great expectations and great limitations; walking the tightrope of political leadership in the twenty first century. In J. Storey, J. Hartley, J.-L. Denis, P. ‘t Hart, & D. Ulrich (Eds.),  The Routledge companion to leadership (pp. 209–224). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2019). Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: Bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle. Public Money and Management, 39(4), 241–252. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luka, N. (2018). Civic coproduction = counterinstitutions + people: Make participation work by focusing on the possible. Retrieved from https://www.thenatureofcities.com/2018/07/09/civic-coproduction-counterinstitutions-people-make-participation-work-focusing-possible/.
   Google Scholar
• Mabey, C., & Freeman, T. (2010). Reflections on leadership and place. Policy Studies, 31(4), 505–522. doi: 10.1080/01442871003723465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlrath, L. & MacLabhrainn, L. (Eds.) (2007). Higher education and civic engagement: International perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2018). Co-production and public service management, citizenship, governance and public services management. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, M. C. (2019). Embedding in the city? Locating civil society in the philanthropy of place. Community Development Journal, 54(2), 179–196. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsx020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sara, R., & Jones, M. (2018). The university as agent of change in the city: Co-creation of live community architecture. Archnet, International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(1), 326–337. doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. P. (2005). Studentification: The gentrification factory. In R. Atkinson, & G. Bridge (Eds.), Gentrification in a global context: The new urban colonialism (pp. 72–89). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2018). Co-initiation of collaborative inovation in urban spaces. Urban Affairs Review, 54(2), 388–418. doi: 10.1177/1078087416651936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2019). Public administration into the wild: Grappling with co-production and social innovation. In A. Massey (Ed.), A research agenda for public administration (pp. 63–78). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, V. (2019). May’s flagship drops anchor. Wonkhe, Comment, 04 June 2019, Retrieved from https://wonkhe.com/blogs/mays-flagship-drops-anchor/.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, D. F., Husted, K., & Casas, A. (2018). Community foundations as advocates: social change discourse in the philanthropic sector. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 7(3), 206–232. doi: 10.1057/s41309-018-0039-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., & Sørensen, E. (2019). Interactive political leadership in theory and practice: How elected politicians may benefit from co-creating public value outcomes. Administrative Sciences, 9(3), 1–18. doi: 10.3390/admsci9030051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration and Society, 51(5), 795–825. doi: 10.1177/0095399716680057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Community Foundations. (2019). Giving for local good. Retrieved from https://www.ukcommunityfoundations.org/.
   Google Scholar
• UPP Foundation. (2019). Truly civic: Strengthening the connection between universities and their places. Final report of the Civic University Commission, Retrieved from https://upp-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Civic-University-Commission-Final-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UPP Foundation (2017) Report of the trustees for the year ended 31 August 2017, 1-7, http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Accounts/Ends23/0001166323_AC_20170831_E_C.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, P., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Kempton, L. (2019). Facilitating spaces for place-based leadership in centralized governance systems: The case of newcastle city futures. Regional Studies, published online 26 April.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vennik, F. D., van den Bovenkamp, H. M., Putters, K., & Grit, K. J. (2016). Co-production in healthcare: Rhetoric and practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 150–168. doi: 10.1177/0020852315570553
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Hollister, R., Stroud, S. E., & Babcock, E. (2011). The engaged university, international perspectives on civic engagement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar