How does digital technology impact on the co-production of local services? Evidence from a childcare experience

References

• Aceto, G., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2018). The role of information and communication technologies in healthcare: Taxonomies, perspectives, and challenges. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 107, 125–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, A. (2009). Engaging public sector clients - From service-delivery to co-production. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of elinor ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellotti, V. M. E., Cambridge, S., Hoy, K., Shih, P. C., Handalian, L. R., Han, K., & Carroll, J. M. (2014). Towards community-centered support for peer-to-peer service exchange: Rethinking the timebanking metaphor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2975–2984). New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, S., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: How users and communities contribute to public services. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S. (2000). Scenarios in user-centred design—setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00024-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of co-production: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2018). Definitions of co-production and co-creation. In T. Brandsen, & M. Honingh (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., & Steen, T. (2018). Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging citizens in public services. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Yang, T. S. (2013). How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn, E. S. (2000). No more throwaway people: The co-production imperative. Washington, DC: Essential Books.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (eds.). (2015). Varieties of governance: Dynamics, strategies, capacities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., Rayner, J., & Zito, A. R. (2012). Governance from the bottom up: Complexity and divergence in comparative perspective. Public Administration, 90(1), 56–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 43–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., Shih, P. C., Han, K., & Kropczynski, J. (2017). Coordinating community cooperation: Integrating timebanks and nonprofit volunteering by design. International Journal of Design, 11(1), 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M. (2015). Opportunity structures for citizens’ Participation in Italian regions: A case study. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(2), Article 6. [ISSN: 1937-2841].
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M. (2017a). Who Governs in (Local) Governance? Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Revista de Administracao Publica-Brazilian Journal of Public Administration 51(6), 1121–1138.
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M. (2017b). Adaptation or transformation? Interpreting participation in times of austerity in a (old) red region. PArtecipazione e COnflitto. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 10(3), 1005–1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i3p1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S. G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2014). Affordances for practice. Information and Organization, 24(4), 236–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017). A Survey of value sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human-computer Interaction, 11(2), 63–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., Bondarouk, E., & Brandsen, T. (2018). Co-production in primary schools: A systematic literature review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, OnlineFirst.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2017). The achilles heels of collaboration: Overcoming critical capacity deficits in collaborative governance arrangements? Paper presented at the NUS-FPZG UNESCO Chair Workshop on The Governance of Collaboration: Co-Production, Contracting, Commissioning and Certification, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Kakar, A. K. (2018). Investigating factors that promote time banking for sustainable community based socio-economic growth and development. Computers in Human Behaviour, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.034
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2016). Reframing, reimagining and remaking smart cities. In Programmable city working paper. n. 20. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/cyjhg/.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lampinen, A., Huotari, K., & Cheshire, C. (2015). Challenges to participation in the sharing economy: The case of local online peer-to-peer exchange in a single parents’ network. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), IxD&A(24), 16–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V. (2017). The increasing role of digital technologies in co-production. The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 75, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V. (2018). The role of new technologies in co-production and co-creation. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public service delivery. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019, FirstView). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review, 1, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R. A., & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance based design: A relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design, 20(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0060-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., & Markus, M. L. (2013). Technology affordances and constraints in management information systems (MIS). In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. In Proceedings of graphics interface. Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2012). Co-production in an information age. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), ‘New public governance, the third sector and co-production’. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2018). Evolution of co-production in the information age: Crowdsourcing as a model of web-based co-production in Korea. Policy and Society, 37(3), 294–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1376475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, L. P., Friedman, B., Klasnja, P., Kane, S. K., & Miller, J. K. (2008). Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on designing interactive systems - DIS ‘08, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394446
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2011). From the new public management to public governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24(S1), S31–S47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozanne, L. (2010). Learning to exchange time: Benefits and obstacles to time banking. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 14 (A), 1–16. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.15133/j.ijccr.2010.002
   Google Scholar
• Paletti, A. (2016). Co-production through ICT in the public sector: When citizens reframe the production of public services. In L. Caporarello, F. Cesaroni, R. Giesecke, & M. Missikoff (Eds.), Digitally Supported Innovation, 18, 141–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40265-9_10
   Google Scholar
• Paletti, A. (2018). How toManage ICTs mediated co-production: A public value perspective. Proceedings of the 51st hawaii international conference on system sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L. L., & Oakerson, R. J. (1999). Ch. 17 in local public economies. Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. McGinnis, Michael d. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., … Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as co-producers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 1001–1011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perentis, C., Vescovi, M., Leonardi, C., Moiso, C., Musolesi, M., Pianesi, F., & Lepri, B. (2017). Anonymous or Not? Understanding the factors affecting personal mobile data disclosure. ACM Trans. Internet Technol, 17(2), Article 13 (March 2017), 19 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3017431
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2011). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight european countries. In V. Pestoff, T. Drandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas, 23(4), 1102–1118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Scenario-based Design. In The human–computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rønning, R., Enquist, B., & Fuglsang, L. (2013). Framing innovation in public service sectors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2016). Public services Management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., Sancino, A., Nabatchi, T., & Guarini, E. (2019). Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review. Public Money & Management, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy and Society, 37(3), 277–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions. M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachokyriakos, V., Crivellaro, C., Wright, P., Karamagioli, E., Staiou, E.-R., Gouscos, D., … Olivier, P. (2017). HCI, solidarity movements and the solidarity economy. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘17) (pp. 3126–3137). New York, NY, USA: ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025490
   Google Scholar
• Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. (2017). Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. In The routledge companion to management information systems. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. D., & Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21, 105–125. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. W. R., & Leleux, C. (2018). Smart governance: Opportunities for technologically-mediated citizen co-production. Information Polity, 23(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar