Enacting audit legitimacy: internal processes of VFM auditing in Victoria, Australia

References

• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In The sociological review. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1999). Actor-network theory—the market test. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, W. (2009). Interview with author, 22 February.
   Google Scholar
• Dahanayake, S. J. (2014). The Enactment of Auditability: Developing Value for Money (VFM) Audit Practice in the State of Victoria, PhD Thesis, The Australian National University, Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Dahanayake, S. J., & Jacobs, K. (2013). Practising VFM Audit: Unpacking the VFM audit methodologies. In APIRA conference 2013. Japan: Kobe.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. (2003). Emasculating public accountability in the name of competition: Transformation of state audit in Victoria. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 51–76. doi: 10.1006/cpac.2002.0523
   Google Scholar
• Funnel, W. (2015). Performance auditing and adjudicating political disputes. Financial Accountability and Management, 31(1), 92–111. doi: 10.1111/faam.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funnel, W., Wade, M., & Jupe, R. (2016). Stakeholder perceptions of performance audit creditability. Accounting and Business Research, 46(6), 601–619. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2016.1157680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funnell, W. (1998). Executive coercion and state audit: A processual analysis of the responses of the Australian audit office to the dilemmas of efficiency auditing 1978–84. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(4), 436–458. doi: 10.1108/09513579810231448
   Google Scholar
• Funnell, W. (2003). Enduring fundamentals: Constitutional accountability and Auditors-General in the reluctant state. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 107–132. doi: 10.1006/cpac.2002.0519
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2001). In the name of accountability: State auditing, independence and new public management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(3), 278–310. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005518
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2007). The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 101–129. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1999). A quarter century of performance auditing in the Australian federal public sector: A malleable masque. Abacus, 35(3), 302–332. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00048
   Google Scholar
• Hamburger, P. (1989). Efficiency auditing by the Australian audit office: Reform and reaction under three Auditors- General. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(3), 3–21. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000001927
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organization and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. (1998). Exploring the modern audit firm: An Introduction. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5/6), 515–516. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (1998). Value for money auditing in New Zealand: Competing for control in the public sector. British Accounting Review, 30, 343–360. doi: 10.1006/bare.1998.0077
   Google Scholar
• Justesen, L., & Mouritsen, J. (2011). Effects of actor-network theory in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(2), 161–193. doi: 10.1108/09513571111100672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalifa, R., Sharma, N., Humphrey, C., & Robson, K. (2007). ‘Discourse and audit change: Transformations in methodology in the professional audit field. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(6), 825–854. doi: 10.1108/09513570710830263
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2008). The NPM agenda: Back to the future. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 77–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00444.x
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: The Cruellest invention of the human spirit? ABACUS, 45(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: the case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 31–52. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, L. P., Jacobs, K., & Schmits, J. (2019). New public management and the rise of public sector performance audit: Evidence from the Australian case. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 280–306. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H., & Waerness, M. (1999). Performance or compliance? Performance audit and public management in five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2/3), 289–315. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(95)00004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 379–394. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (PAEC). (2010). 101^st Report to the parliament: Report on the inquiry into Victoria’s Audit Act 1994. Melbourne: Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, V. S. (1998). Efficiency audit: An assembly of rationalities and programmes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(4), 377–410. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, V. S. (1999). Knowing efficiency: The enactment of efficiency in efficiency auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 333–362. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00067-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rica, N., & Jacobs, K. (2018). Reputational risk and environmental performance auditing: A study in the Australian commonwealth public sector. Financial Accountability and Management, 35, 182–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K. (1992). Accounting numbers as ‘inscription’: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(7), 685–708. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90019-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K., Humphrey, C., Khalifa, R., & Jones, J. (2007). Transforming audit technologies: Business risk audit methodologies and the audit field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 409–438. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaerbaek, P. (2009). Public sector auditor identities in making efficiency auditable: The national audit office of Denmark as independent auditor and modernizer. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 971–981. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1982). Special report of the auditor-general of Victoria. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1983). Report of the auditor-general of Victoria: Works contract overview, second report. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1984). Report of the auditor-general: Comprehensive Audits, Government Stores Operations. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1985). Annual report 1985. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1986). Annual report 1986. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1987a). Annual report 1987. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1987b). Corporate plan, 1986–1991. Author, internal document.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1991). Corporate plan, 1991–1994. internal document: Author.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (1994). Corporate plan, 1994–1997. internal document: Author.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (2000). Annual report 2000. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (2008). Audit Manager 1, interview transcript, 14 July.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (2017a). Corporate plan, 2017-2021. Internal document: Author.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (2017b). Annual report 2016-17. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (2018a). Annual report 2017-18. Melbourne: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• VAGO. (2018b). Annual plan 2018-19. Author, Internal document.
   Google Scholar
• Yule, P. (2002). In the public interest: 150 years of the Victorian AGO. Melbourne: VAGO.
   Google Scholar