References
- Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2017). Rational and ritualistic use of key performance indicators in hybrid organizations. Public Money and Management, 37(6), 409–416. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1344021
- Almquist, R., Grossi, G., van Helden, G. J., & Reichard , C. (2013). Public sector governance and accountability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7-8), 479–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.11.005
- Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049
- Barretta, A., & Busco, C. (2011). Technologies of government in public sector’s networks: In search of cooperation through management control innovations. Management Accounting Research, 22, 211–219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2011.10.002
- Bergmann, A. (2018). Editorial: Public performance management—and the linkage to finance and accounting. Public Money and Management, 38(3), 161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1434270
- Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., Otley, D. T., & Stringer, C. (2009). Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature. The British Accounting Review, 41, 2–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001
- Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? British Medical Journal, 332, 419–422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7538.419
- Blaug, R., Horner, L., & Lekhi, R. (2006). Public value, politics and public management—A literature review (www.theworkfoundation.com).
- Brodsky, R. L. (2014). “Public value” and the measurement of government performance: The shift to subjective metrics. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 478–479. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12234
- Chenhall, R. H., Hall, M., & Smith, D. (2017). The expressive role of performance measurement systems: A field study of a mental health development project. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 63, 60–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.11.002
- Demaj, L., & Summermatter, L. (2012). What should we know about politicians’ Performance information need and use? International Public Management Review, 13(2), 85–111.
- Department of Finance. (2012a). Discussion paper—Is less more? Towards better commonwealth performance. Australian Government. (www.finance.gov.au).
- Department of Finance. (2012b). Position paper—Sharpening the focus: a framework for improving commonwealth performance. Australian Government. (www.finance.gov.au).
- Department of Finance. (2015a). Resource management guide No. 130 (RMG 130) —Overview of the enhanced commonwealth performance framework. Australian Government. (www.finance.gov.au).
- Department of Finance. (2015b). RMG 131—Developing good performance information. Australian Government. www.finance.gov.au.
- Department of Finance. (2015c). RMG 132—Corporate plan for commonwealth entities. Australian Government. www.finance.gov.au.
- Department of Finance. (2015d). RMG 133—Corporate plan for commonwealth companies. Australian Government. www.finance.gov.au.
- Department of Finance. (2015e). RMG 134 —Annual performance statements for Commonwealth entities. Australian Government. (www.finance.gov.au).
- Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2014). Portfolio budget statements, 2013–2014. Australian Government. www.budget.gov.au.
- Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2015). Portfolio budget statements, 2014–2015. Australian Government. www.budget.gov.au.
- Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2016). Portfolio budget statements, 2015–2016. Australian Government. www.budget.gov.au.
- Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2017). Portfolio budget statements, 2016–2017. Australian Government Canberra. (www.budget.gov.au ).
- Department of Human Services. (2014). Portfolio budget statements, 2013–2014. Australian Government. www.budget.gov.au.
- Department of Human Services. (2015). Portfolio budget statements, 2014–2015. Australian Government. www.budget.gov.au.
- Department of Human Services. (2016). Portfolio budget statements, 2015–2016. Australian Government. www.budget.gov.au.
- Department of Human Services. (2017). Portfolio budget statements, 2016–2017. Australian Government. www.budget.gov.au.
- Goodard, A. (2004). Budgetary practices and accountability habitus—A grounded theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 543–577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410554551
- Hodges, R. (2012). Joined-Up government and the challenges to accounting and accountability researchers. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(1), 26–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00535.x
- Jacobs, K., Marcon, G., & Witt, D. (2004). Cost and performance information for doctors: an international comparison. Management Accounting Research, 15, 337–354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2004.03.005
- Jansen, E. P. (2008). New public management: Perspectives on performance and the use of performance information. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(2), 169–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00447.x
- Kurunmäki, L., & Miller, P. (2006). Modernising government: The calculating self, hybridisation and performance measurement. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(1), 87–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00394.x
- Micheli, P., & Mari, L. (2014). The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management Accounting Research, 25, 147–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.005
- Miller, P. (2006). Management accounting and sociology. Handbook of Management Accounting Research, 1, 285–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(06)01010-8
- Modell, S. (2004). Performance measurement myths in the public sector: A research note. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(1), 39–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00185.x
- Modell, S. (2009). Institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector accounting literature: a review and assessment. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(3), 277–303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00477.x
- Modell, S., Jacobs, K., & Wiesel, F. (2007). A process (re)turn? Path dependencies, institutions and performance measurement in Swedish central government. Management Accounting Research, 18, 453–475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.12.001
- Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value. Harvard.
- Moore, M. (2013). Recognizing public value. Harvard.
- Papi, L., Bigoni, M., Bracci, E., & Gagliardo, E. D. (2018). Measuring public value: a conceptual and applied contribution to the debate. Public Money and Management, 38(7), 503–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1439154
- Pollitt, C. (2018). Performance management 40 years on: a review. Some key decisions and consequences. Public Money and Management, 38(3), 167–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1407129
- Taylor, J. (2007). The usefulness of key performance indicators to public accountability authorities in east asia. Public Administration and Development, 27, 341–352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.460
- Wankhade, P. (2011). Performance measurement and the UK emergency ambulance service: Unintended consequences of the ambulance response time targets. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(5), 384–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111147132