Legitimating the standard-setter of public sector accounting reforms

References

• Aquino, A. C. B., & Batley, R. (2020). The Effects of Role Performance on Institutional Maintenance, Blending and Accommodation in Public Financial Management Reforms, Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Argento, D., Peda, P., & Grossi, G. (2018). The enabling role of institutional entrepreneurs in the accounting change of a transitional economy, Public Administration & Development, 38(1), 39–49. doi: 10.1002/pad.1819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. R., Aquino, A., Neves, F. & Silva, C. (2020a). Deadlines and software: Disentangling local government accounting gradual reforms in Brazil. Public Money & Management, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. R., Lino, A. F, Machado-Martins, T. C. P, & Aquino, A.C.B. (2020b) Financial management information systems and accounting policies retention in Brazil. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2/3); 207–227. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2019-0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., & Grossi, G. (2019). Glocalization of accounting standards: Observations on neo-institutionalism of IPSAS. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 95–103. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1580894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Kirk, E. A. & Larrinaga, C. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 2, pp. 78–94. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, A., Grossi, G., Rauskala, I., & Fuchs, S. (2016). Consolidation in the public sector: methods and approaches in OECD countries, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 763–783. doi: 10.1177/0020852315576713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzem, S., & Quack, S. (2005). Contested rules and shifting boundaries: International standard-setting in accounting. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-196742
   Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., & Rossi, F. M. (Eds.). (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe: The challenge of harmonization. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Gómez-Villegas, M., & Montesinos, V. (2016). Public financial management reforms: The role of IPSAS in Latin-America. Public Administration and Development, 36(1), 51-64. doi: 10.1002/pad.1747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Grossi, G., & Manes-Rossi, F. (2018). Setting consolidated reporting standards for local government. Public Money & Management, 38(7), 483–492. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1524199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Montesinos, V. & Chow, D. (2013). Legitimating international public sector accounting standards (IPSAS): the case of Spain, Public Money & Management, 33:6, 437–444, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.836006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7), 565–596. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 27–54. doi: 10.4135/9781446280669.n2
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, M. L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Dynamics introduction: A world of governance: The rise of transnational regulation. In Djelic, M. L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds.). (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review. 21, 1022–1054. doi: 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homero Junior, P. F. (2018). Reconstitution of the field of accounting regulation in Brazil during the adoption of the IFRS. Doctoral Thesis, University of São Paulo, São Paulo. doi:10.11606/T.12.2018.tde-03042018-163010.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., Meyer, R. E., Polzer, T., Rota, S., Seiwald, J., & Steccolini, I. (2018). Legitimating change in the public sector: The introduction of (rational?) accounting practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1374–1399. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1383781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, B. & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Dynamics of soft regulations In Djelic, M. L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds.). (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, L. & Lowensohn, S. (2018). Stakeholder participation in the governmental accounting standard-setting process, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 30(2), 252–268 doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2018-0019
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B. (2008). Power, Institutions and Organizations. In: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., Suddaby, R. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (1ed). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, p.170–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lino, A., & Aquino, A. (2020). Organizational wrongdoing in courts of accounts. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 54(2), 220–242.
   Google Scholar
• Lino, A. F., & Aquino, A. C. B. (2018). The diversity of the Brazilian regional audit courts of accounts on government auditing. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29(76), p. 26–40 doi: 10.1590/1808-057x201803640
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), p. 340. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, S. P. P., Marcelino, G. F., & Silva, C. A. T. (2019). Os Tribunais de Contas na interpretação da Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 13, e145151. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2019.145151
   Google Scholar
• Poljašević, J., Vašiček, V. & Jovanović, T. (2019). Comparative review of dual reporting in public sector in three south-east European countries. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(3), 325–344. doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2019-0035
   Google Scholar
• Power, T. J. (2010). Optimism, pessimism, and coalitional presidentialism: Debating the institutional design of Brazilian democracy. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 29(1), 18–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2009.00304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichertz, J. (2013). Induction, deduction. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage, London, 123
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2014). Interpretation and analysis. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 136–149 doi: 10.4135/9781446282243.n10
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., Suddaby, R. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (1ed). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 131–147.
   Google Scholar