References
- Aggestam Pontoppidan, C., & Brusca, I. (2016). The first steps towards harmonizing public sector accounting for european union member states: Strategies and perspectives. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1133970
- Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. Sage.
- Amafa Heritage. (2017). Comment letter to IPSASB CP financial reporting for heritage in the public sector. International Federation of Accountants [IFAC]. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/ResponsetoIPSASBED156.pdf.
- Anderson, S. B., Brown, J. L., Hodder, L., & Hopkins, P. E. (2015). The effect of alternative accounting measurement bases on investors’ assessments of managers’ stewardship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 46, 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.007
- Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB). (2019). Report on March 2019 meeting of the IPSASB (AASB Meeting April 2019, Agenda Item 10.1). https://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/10.1_SP_IPSASB_Update_March_2019_M170.pdf.
- Austrian Federal Ministry of Finance. (2017). Comment letter to IPSASB CP financial reporting for heritage in the public sector. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/Comments_CPHeritage_Austria_english_20170929_end.pdf.
- Barker, R., & McGeachin, A. (2015). An analysis of concepts and evidence on the question of whether IFRS should be conservative. Abacus, 51(2), 169–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12049
- Barton, A. (2005). The conceptual arguments concerning accounting for public heritage assets: A note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510600774
- Bergmann, A., Fuchs, S., & Schuler, C. (2019). A theoretical basis for public sector accrual accounting research: Current state and perspectives. Public Money & Management, 39(8), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1654319
- Botzem, S. (2012). The politics of accounting regulation: Organizing transnational standard setting in financial reporting. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Botzem, S. (2014). Transnational standard setting in accounting: Organizing expertise-based self-regulation in times of crises. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(6), 933–955. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1301
- Botzem, S., Quack, S., & Zori, S. (2017). International accounting standards in Africa: Selective recursivity for the ‘happy few’? Global Policy, 8(4), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12514
- Bougen, P. D., & Young, J. J. (2012). Fair value accounting: Simulacra and simulation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(4–5), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.05.004
- CAG. (2019). Limited scope review of the conceptual framework, 9 December, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/files/6-Limited-Scope-Review-of-Conceptual-Framework_Final.pdf.
- Chakravarthy, J. (2019). Ideological diversity in standard setting. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(1), 113–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9478-7
- Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Sage Publications.
- Danish Ministry of Finance. (2017). Comment letter to IPSASB CP financial reporting for heritage in the public sector. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/TheDanishcommentstotheConsultationPaperFinancialReportingforHeritageinthePublicSector.pdf.
- EC. (2013). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Towards implementing harmonised public sector accounting standards in member states (COM[2013] 114 final).
- EC. (2019a). Comment letter on consultation paper measurement. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/CommentlettertoIPSASBCPMeasurement.pdf.
- EC. (2019b). Reporting on the progress as regards the EPSAS: Commission staff working document (SWD(2019) 204 final).
- Ellwood, S., & Garcia-Lacalle, J. (2012). Old wine in new bottles: IFRS adoption in NHS foundation trusts. Public Money & Management, 32(5), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2012.703411
- Ellwood, S., & Greenwood, M. (2016). Accounting for heritage assets: Does measuring economic value ‘kill the cat’? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 38, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.05.009
- Ellwood, S., & Newberry, S. (2016). New development: The conceptual underpinnings of international public sector accounting. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1140974
- Erb, C., & Pelger, C. (2015). ‘Twisting words’? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.11.001
- Eurostat. (2018a). EPSAS Cell on principles related to EPSAS standards: Note of the meeting—draft (EPSAS Cell STA 18/03).
- Eurostat. (2018b). European public sector accounting standards—conceptual framework: Reflection paper. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/epsas/key-documents/technical-developments.
- Eurostat. (2019a, May 13–14). Role of the measurement basis in financial statements for decision-making and accountability: Item 4 of the agenda, EPSAS working group meeting. Rome.
- Eurostat. (2019b, November 18–19). Measurement bases from a practical perspective: Item 4 of the agenda, EPSAS working group meeting. Luxembourg.
- FOCAL. (2017). Comment letter to IPSASB CP financial reporting for heritage in the public sector. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/CPHeritagebyFOCAL.pdf.
- Halliday, T., & Carruthers, B. (2009). Bankrupt: Global lawmaking and systemic financial crisis. Stanford University Press.
- Heads of Treasuries Accounting and Reporting Advisory Committee (HoTARAC). (2011). Comment letter to IPSASB-CP measurement—phase 3. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/5136-conceptual-framework-for.pdf.
- Heald, D., & Georgiou, G. (1995). Resource accounting: Valuation, consolidation and accounting regulation. Public Administration, 73(4), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00846.x
- Himick, D., & Brivot, M. (2019). Carriers of ideas in accounting standard setting and financialization: The role of epistemic communities. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 66, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.12.003
- Himick, D., Brivot, M., & Henri, J. F. (2016). An ethical perspective on accounting standard setting: Professional and lay-experts’ contribution to GASB’s pension project. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 36, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.12.002
- Hines, R. D. (1989). Financial accounting knowledge, conceptual framework projects and the social construction of the accounting profession. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(2), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268
- Hodges, R. (2016). New development: The conundrum of fair value measurement—evidence from the UK FRAB. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1133982
- Hodges, R., & Mellett, H. (2003). Reporting public sector financial results. Public Management Review, 5(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667022000028870
- IASB. (2018). IFRS conceptual framework: Project summary, march 2018. IFRS Foundation.
- Institute of Public Auditors in Germany. (2013). Comment letter to IPSASB-ED measurement—phase 3. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/020%20IDW.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2006). Public sector conceptual framework, project brief, December 2006. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/IPSASB-ProjectBrief-ConceptualFramework.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2010). Consultation paper conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities: Measurement of assets and liabilities in financial statements. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/IPSASB-CP_Measurement-Phase_3.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2012). Exposure draft conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities: Measurement of assets and liabilities in financial statements, November 2012. IFAC.
- IPSASB. (2013). Meeting highlights, September 2013, Toronto, Canada. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/files/200131008%20Meeting_Highlights_Toronto_September%202013_Final.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2014). Conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities. IFAC.
- IPSASB. (2016). Approved minutes of the meeting of the IPSASB: Held on September 20-23, 2016 in Toronto, Canada. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/files/Agenda-Item-1.3-Approved-IPSASB-Minutes-September.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2017a). Project Brief and Outline, Subject—Public Sector Measurement, March 17-20, 2017. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/Project%20Brief-approved-Public%20Sector%20Measurement-17%20March%202017.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2017b). Public sector measurement: Agenda item 8, September 19-22, 2017. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/files/Agenda-Item-8-combined_0.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2018). Proposed strategy and work plan 2019-2023. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IPSASB-Strategy-and-Work-Plan-2019-2023-Consultation.pdf.
- IPSASB. (2019a). Consultation paper: Measurement. IFAC.
- IPSASB. (2019b). IPSAS 42: Social benefits. IFAC.
- IPSASB. (2019c). Strategy and Work Plan 2019–2023: Delivering Global Standards, Inspiring Implementation. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IPSASB-Strategy-and-Work-Plan-2019-2023.pdf.
- Jupe, R. E. (2000). Self-referential lobbying of the accounting standards board: The case of financial reporting standard No. 1. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(3), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1999.0366
- Kidwell, L. A., & Lowensohn, S. (2019). Participation in the process of setting public sector accounting standards: The case of IPSASB. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1632466
- KPMG. (2017). Comment letter to IPSASB CP financial reporting for heritage in the public sector. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/KPMGCommentsonCP-FinancialReportingforHeritageinthePublicSector.pdf.
- Ministry of Finance Ontario. (2011). Comment letter to IPSASB-CP measurement - phase 3. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/5185-ontario-canada-response-c.pdf.
- Oulasvirta, L. (2014). The reluctance of a developed country to choose international public sector accounting standards of the IFAC. A critical case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.12.001
- Pelger, C. (2016). Practices of standard setting—An analysis of the IASB's and FASB's process of identifying the objective of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.001
- Pelger, C. (2020). The return of stewardship, reliability and prudence—a commentary on the IASB’s new conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 17(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1645960
- Provincial Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. (2011). Comment letter to IPSASB-CP measurement-phase 3. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/5158-provincial-government-of.pdf.
- Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB). (2017). Comment letter to IPSASB-CP financial reporting for heritage in public sector. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/Combinedcomment-HeritageAsset.pdf.
- Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111162070
- Ramanna, K. (2015). Political standards: Corporate interest, ideology, and leadership in the shaping of accounting rules for the market economy. University of Chicago Press.
- Ravenscroft, S., & Williams, P. F. (2009). Making imaginary worlds real: The case of expensing employee stock options. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.12.001
- Whittington, G. (2008). Fair value and the IASB/FASB conceptual framework project: An alternative view. Abacus, 44(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00255.x
- Young, J. J. (1994). Outlining regulatory space: Agenda issues and the FASB. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90013-2
- Young, J. J. (1996). Institutional thinking: The case of financial instruments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(5), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00031-3
- Young, J. J. (2003). Constructing, persuading and silencing: The rhetoric of accounting standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00016-8
- Young, J. J. (2014). Separating the political and technical: Accounting standard-setting and purification. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 713–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12046
- Zeff, S. A. (2016). Political lobbying on accounting standards: US, UK and international experience. In C. Nobes, & R. Parker (Eds.), Comparative international accounting, 13th edition (pp. 206–232). Pearson Education.