The academic voice in the EPSAS project

References

• Adam, B., Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Heiling, J., Jorge, S., & Manes Rossi, F. (2020). Are higher education institutions in Europe preparing students for IPSAS? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2/3), 363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, C., & Brusca, I. (2016). The first steps towards harmonizing public sector accounting for European union member states: Strategies and perspectives. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. M., & Petacchi, R. (2015). Lobbying behavior of governmental entities: Evidence from public pension accounting rules. Harvard Business School Accounting and Management Unit Working Paper No. 15-043. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2533492.
   Google Scholar
• Allini, A., Aria, M., Macchioni, R., & Zagaria, C. (2018). Motivations behind users’ participation in the standard-setting process: Focus on financial analysts. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(3), 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aversano, N., Christiaens, J., Tartaglia Polcini, P., & Sannino, G. (2019). Accounting for heritage assets: An analysis of governmental organization comment letters on the IPSAS consultation paper. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2/3), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez, I., Calvo, J. A., & Mora, A. (2014). Involving academics in the accounting standard-setting process: An application of the Delphi methodology to the assessment of IASB proposals. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(3), 765–791.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E. (2007). Standard-setting measurement issues and the relevance of research. Accounting and Business Research, 37(1), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bisogno, M., Santis, S., & Tommasetti, A. (2015). Public-sector consolidated financial statements: An analysis of the comment letters on IPSASB's exposure draft no. 49. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 311–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D., & Feroz, E. H. (1992). Does the FASB listen to corporations? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(5), 715–731.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R. (1981). A descriptive analysis of select input bases of the financial accounting standards board. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(1), 232–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., & Manes-Rossi, F. (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. The challenge of harmonization. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caperchione, E. (2015). Standard setting in the public sector: State of the art. In I. Brusca, E. Caperchione, S. Cohen, & F. Manes-Rossi (Eds.), Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. The challenge of harmonization (pp. 1–11). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G., & West, B. (1997). Observing the PSASB: ED 50 and the recognition of infrastructure assets. Australian Accounting Review, 7(2), 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, J., Dabbicco, G., Jorge, S., & Jesus, M. A. (2019). The development of EPSAS: Contributions from the literature. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 146–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., Reyniers, B., & Rollé, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial information systems: A comparative study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., Vanhee, C., Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming government financial reporting: An international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 158–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cîrstea, A., Nistor, C. S., & Tiron Tudor, A. (2017). Consolidated financial statements–a new challenge for the public sector administration. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 33(1), 46–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbicco, G., & Steccolini, I. (2020). Building legitimacy for European public sector accounting standards (EPSAS): A governance perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2-3), 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., Fortin, A., & Côté, L. (2007). Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1-2), 29–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2013a). Public consultation: Assessment of the suitability of the IPSAS for the member states. Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2013b). Towards implementing harmonized public sector accounting standards in member states.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2013c). Commission staff working document accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Towards implementing harmonised public sector accounting standards in member states. The suitability of IPSAS for the member states.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2014). Public consultation on future EPSAS governance principles and structures: Draft Report. Paper presented for the Task Force ‘EPSAS Governance’.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2015). Item 5 of the first EPSAS working group meeting ‘stakeholders activities’. Malta: September.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst and Young. (2012). Overview and comparison of public accounting and auditing practices in the EU member states. Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Fülbier, R. U., Hitz, J. M., & Sellhorn, T. (2009). Relevance of academic research and researchers’ role in the IASB's financial reporting standard-setting. Abacus, 45(4), 455–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haring, J. R. (1979). Accounting rules and ‘the accounting establishment’. Journal of Business, 52(4), 507–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heald, D., & Hodges, R. (2015). Will ‘austerity’ be a critical juncture in European public sector financial reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(6), 993–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, M. E., & Ketz, J. E. (1980). Ruling elites of the FASB: A study of the big eight. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 3(4), 354–367.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, G. (2020). The IPSASB's recent strategies: Opportunities for academics and standard-setters. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(3), 315–319.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H., & Caruana, J. (2015). EPSAS—worrying the wrong end of the stick. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, L. A., & Lowensohn, S. (2019). Participation in the process of setting public sector accounting standards: The case of IPSASB. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, L., & Lowensohn, S. (2018). Stakeholder participation in the governmental accounting standard-setting process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 30(2), 252–268.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K., & Herz, P. J. (2011). The academic community’s participation in global accounting standard-setting. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23(1), 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Manes-Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2015). Advancing performance measurement: Italian local government vis-à-vis the IPSASB project. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(1), 76–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manes-Rossi, F., Cohen, S., Caperchione, E., & Brusca, I. (2016). Harmonizing public sector accounting in Europe: Thinking out of the box. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, B., Lorson, P. C., Oulasvirta, L., & Haustein, E. (2019). The quest for a primary EPSAS purpose–insights from literature and conceptual frameworks. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 195–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei, G., Jorge, S., & Grandis, F. G. (2020). Comparability in IPSASs: Lessons to be learned for the European standards. Accounting in Europe, 17(2), 158–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezias, S. J., & Chung, S. (1989). Due process and participation at the FASB. A study of the comment period. Financial Executives Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, L. O. (2014). Governmental financial accounting and European harmonization: Case study of Finland. Accounting, Economics and Law, 4(3), 237–263.
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, L. O., & Bailey, S. J. (2016). Evolution of EU public sector financial accounting standardization: Critical events that opened the window for attempted policy change. Journal of European Integration, 38(6), 653–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• PwC . (2014). Collection of information related to the potential impact, including costs, of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. (1999). Technocracy in the European union. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., Dunstan, K., & Stanley, T. (1999). Constituent participation in the Australian public sector accounting standard-setting process. Financial Accountability & Management, 15(2), 173–200.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, K. (1994). Academic accounting research and the standards setting process. Accounting Horizons, 8(4), 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers, D., & Hofmann, S. (2020). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs): A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, online first, doi.org/10.1111/faam.12265.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton-Green, B. (2010). The communication gap: Why doesn’t accounting research make a greater contribution to debates on accounting policy. Accounting in Europe, 7, 129–145.
   Google Scholar
• Tandy, P. R., & Wilburn, N. L. (1996). The academic community's participation in standard-setting: Submission of comment letters on SFAS nos. 1–117. Accounting Horizons, 10(3), 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Weetman, P., Davis, E. S., & Collins, W. (1996). Lobbying on accounting issues – preparer/user imbalance in the case of the operating and financial review. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 59–76.
   Google Scholar