The consequences of the temporary employment of project managers for public innovation: An analysis of EU projects in Finland

References

• Andersen, L. B. (2016). Can command and incentive systems enhance motivation and public innovation? In J. Torfing, & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 237–255). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anttiroiko, A.-V., Bailey, S. J., & Valkama, P. (2011). Innovations in public governance in the western world. In A.-V. Anttiroiko, S. J. Bailey, & P. Valkama (Eds.), Innovations in public governance (pp. 1–22). IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I. (2010). Partnership as an EU policy instrument: A political history. West European Politics, 33(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R. M. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Bowman, Q. (2011). Innovation in democratic governance. In A.-V. Anttiroiko, S. J. Bailey, & P. Valkama (Eds.), Innovations in public governance (pp. 173–193). IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brulin, G., & Svensson, L. (2012). Managing sustainable development programmes. Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Büttner, S. M. (2019). The European dimension of projectification: Implications of the project approach in EU funding policy. In D. Hodgson, M. Fred, S. Bailey, & P. Hall (Eds.), The projectification of the public sector (pp. 169–188). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. (2011). Managing & organizations. An introduction to theory and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational Performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. (2011). Collaborative governance: private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy—Weber, organization, ethics. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Engwall, M. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32(5), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fred, M. (2018). Projectification—the Trojan horse of local government. Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Godenhjelm, S., & Johanson, J. E. (2018). The effect of stakeholder inclusion on public sector project innovation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315620291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godenhjelm, S., Lundin, R. A., & Sjöblom, S. (2015). Projectification in the public sector – The case of the European Union. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(2), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2014-0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godenhjelm, S., Sjöblom, S., & Jensen, C. (2019). Project governance in an embedded state. In D. Hodgson, M. Fred, S. Bailey, & P. Hall (Eds.), The projectification of the public sector (pp. 149–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (2002). Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies, 36(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220122025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (2004a). Learning in projects, remembering in networks?: Communality, sociality, and connectivity in project ecologies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776404041417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (2004b). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491–1514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604047996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gripenberg, P., Sveiby, K.-E., & Segercrantz, B. (2012). Challenging the innovation paradigm: The prevailing pro-innovation bias. In K.-E. Sveiby, P. Gripenberg, & B. Segercrantz (Eds.), Challenging the innovation paradigm (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2016). Organizational and governance aspects of diffusing public innovation. In J. Torfing, & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 95–114). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. E. (2004). Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization, 11(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404039659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. E., Fred, M., Bailey, S., & Hall, P. (2019). Introduction. In D. E. Hodgson, M. Fred, S. Bailey, & P. Hall (Eds.), The projectification of the public sector (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ika, L. A. (2009). Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, M. L. F., & Thrane, C. (2016). Public innovation and organizational structure: Searching (in vain) for the optimal design. In J. Torfing, & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 217–236). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, B., Pierre, J., & Sundström, G. (2015). Governing the embedded state: The organizational dimension of governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. F. (2012). The project society. Arhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., Johansson, S., & Löfström, M. (2006). Project relationships – A model for analyzing interactional uncertainty. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.004.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., Johansson, S., & Löfström, M. (2013). The project organization as a policy tool in implementing welfare reforms in the public sector. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 28(1), 122–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovách, I., & Kučerova, E. (2009). The social context of project proliferation-the rise of a project class. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 11(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080903033804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Galés, P. (2011). Policy instruments and governance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The Sage handbook of governance (pp. 142–159). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, R. A., Arvidsson, N., Brady, T., Ekstedt, E., Midler, C., & Sydow, J. (2015). Managing and working in project society: Institutional challenges of temporary organizations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. J. (1981). Managing the public’s business: The job of the government executive. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. J. (2006). Public management: Old and new. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, T., Sjöblom, S., Andersson, K., & Skerratt, S. (2012). Exploring short-termism and sustainability: Temporal mechanisms in spatial policies. In S. Sjöblom, K. Andersson, T. Marsden, & S. Skerratt (Eds.), Sustainability and short-term policies. Improving governance in spatial policy interventions (pp. 1–16). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J., & Mantel, S. J. J. (2018). Project management: A managerial approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Munck af Rosenschöld, J., & Wolf, S. A. (2017). Toward projectified environmental governance? Environment and Planning, 49(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16674210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, N. (2017). The government and politics of the European Union (8th edn). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Re-Inventing government. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2010). Conclusions - Public governance and public services delivery: a research agenda for the future. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 413–428). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., & Brown, L. (2013). Introduction: Innovation in public services. In S. Osborne, & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services (pp. 1–14). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. J., & Meier, K. J. (2010). Implementation and managerial networking in the new public governance. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 338–352). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S., & Polverari, L. (2016). Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, J., Soeters, J., van Fenema, P., & de Waard, E. (2009). Structure in temporary organizations. In P. Kenis, M. Janowicz-Panjaitan, & B. Cambré (Eds.), Temporary organizations—Prevalence, logic and effectiveness (pp. 171–200). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., Baregheh, A., & Sambrook, S. (2011). Towards an innovation-type mapping tool. Management Decision, 49(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111094446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Söderholm, A. (2002). The Scandinavian school of project studies. In K. Sahlin-Andersson, & A. Söderholm (Eds.), Beyond project management: New perspectives on the temporary - permanent dilemma. Liber ekonomi.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C. S., & Ahuja, M. K. (2006). Are all distributed teams the same? Differenting between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small Group Research, 37(6), 662–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, S., & Godenhjelm, S. (2009). Project proliferation and governance—Implications for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080903033762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, S., Löfgren, K., & Godenhjelm, S. (2013). Projectified politics —Temporary organizations in a public context. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 17(2), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., & Sullivan, H. (2008). Theory-driven approaches to analysing collaborative performance. Public Management Review, 10(6), 751–771. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14719030802423103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2012). Governance and innovation in the public sector. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 215–227). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382–1394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance? In J. Torfing, & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vento, I. (2020). Public innovation – Concept, praxis, and consequence. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1–5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3886-1.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen, T. (2016). Roles, values, and motivation. In C. Greve, P. Laegreid, & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Nordic adminstrative reforms: Lessons for public management (pp. 79–103). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of local government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Avellaneda, C. N., & Berry, F. S. (2011). Exploring the diffusion of innovation among high and low innovative localities: A test of the Berry and Berry model. Public Management Review, 13(1), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.501616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar