Politicians’ use of performance information in the budget process

References

• Askim, J. (2007). How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 453–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2009). The demand side of performance measurement: Explaining councillors’ utilization of performance information in policymaking. International Public Management Journal, 12(1), 24–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjornholt, B., Bækgaard, M., & Houlberg, K. (2016). Does fiscal austerity affect political decision-makers’ use and perception of performance information? Public Performance & Management Review, 39(3), 560–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, C. (2008). Integrating performance information into legislative budget processes. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(4), 547–569.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, M. E., & Siegel, J. P. (2006). What does appropriate performance reporting for political decision makers require?: Empirical evidence from Switzerland. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(6), 480–497.
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, O. A., Dempster, M. A. H., & Wildavsky, A. (1966). A theory of the budgetary process. The American Political Science Review, 60(3), 529–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demaj, L. (2017). What can performance information do to legislators? A budget-decision experiment with legislators. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 366–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demaj, L., & Summermatter, L. (2012). What should we know about politicians’ performance information need and use? International Public Management Review, 13(2), 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. W., Raudla, R., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2019). The impact of greater centralization on the relevance of performance information in European governments during the fiscal crisis. Administration & Society, 51(7), 1020–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Hyndman, N., Johnsen, A., & Lapsley, I.2008). Accounting in politics: devolution and democratic accountability. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frisco, V., & Stalebrink, O. J. (2008). Congressional use of the program assessment rating tool. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28(2), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• George, B., Desmidt, S., Nielsen, P. A., & Baekgaard, M. (2017). Rational planning and politicians’ preferences for spending and reform: Replication and extension of a survey experiment. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1251–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini, D., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Contextualizing politicians’ uses of accounting information: reassurance and ammunition. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 483–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzle, G. A., & Pettijohn, C. D. (2002). Implementing performance-based program budgeting: a system-dynamics perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Reichard, C., & Ruggiero, P. (2016). Appropriateness and use of performance information in the budgeting process: Some experiences from German and Italian municipalities. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(3), 581–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K. (2006). Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspective of Midwestern mayors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K. (2019). Six theoretical perspectives on performance budgeting reform. In A. T. K. Ho, M. de Jong, & Z. Zhao (Eds.), Performance budgeting reform: Theories and international practices (pp. 13–27). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K., & de Jong, M. (2019). Rethinking Performance Budgeting: Presumed Dead or Alive and Well? In A. T. K. Ho, M. de Jong, & Z. Zhao (Eds.), Performance budgeting reform: Theories and international practices (pp. 3–12). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Lunsford, R. S., Sides, K. C., & Jones, K. A. (2011). State performance-based budgeting in boom and bust years: An analytical framework and survey of the states. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 370–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Siverbo, S. (2009). Explaining the utilization of relative performance evaluation in local government: a multi-theoretical study using data from Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(2), 197–224.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge, S., Jorge de Jesus, M. A., & Nogueira, S. (2016). Information brokers and the use of budgetary and financial information by politicians: the case of Portugal. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 515-520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. G. (1993). Using performance measures for federal budgeting: Proposals and prospects. Public Budgeting & Finance, 13(4), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. G. (2008). Does more (or even better) information lead to better budgeting? A new perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 945–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1981). Congressmen's voting decisions. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Korac, S., Saliterer, I., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2020). Contrasting and explaining purposeful and legitimizing uses of performance information: a mayor’s perspective. Public Management Review, 22(4), 553–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2015). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some like it non-financial … Politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information. Public Management Review, 14(7), 903–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, E. Y., Mohr, Z., & Ho, A. T. K. (2015). Taking stock: Assessing and improving performance budgeting theory and practice. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 426–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, E. Y., & Willoughby, K. (2018). Public performance budgeting: Principles and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Willoughby, K., & Arnett, S. (2009). Legislating results: Examining the legal foundations of PBB systems in the states. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(2), 266–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Grossi, G. (2017). Insights into performance-based budgeting in the public sector: a literature review and a research agenda. Public Management Review, 19(7), 911–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., & Pavlov, A. (2020). What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations. Public Administration, 98(1), 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). What do we talk about when we talk about performance? Dialogue theory and performance budgeting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2009). Through a glass, darkly: Understanding the effects of performance regimes. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(4), 592–603.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2015). Uncovering the circumstances of performance information use findings from an experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 33–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2016). Political use of performance data. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 479–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutiganda, J. C. (2016). How do politicians shape and use budgets to govern public sector organizations? A position-practice approach. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 491–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., & Baekgaard, M. (2015). Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: Evidence from an experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 545–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2001). Integrating financial management and performance management. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(2), 7–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance information for democracy: The missing link? Evaluation, 12(1), 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, P. L., & Fantone, D. M. (2007). Assessing federal program performance: Observations on the US Office of Management and Budget's Program Assessment Rating Tool and its use in the budget process. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 351–368.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J.1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, R. (2012). The use of performance information in budgetary decision-making by legislators: Is Estonia any different? Public Administration, 90(4), 1000–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., Douglas, J. W., Savi, R., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2017). Fiscal crisis and expenditure cuts: The influence of public management practices on cutback strategies in Europe. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 376–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., & Savi, R. (2015). The use of performance information in cutback budgeting. Public Money & Management, 35(6), 409–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, D. Y. (2014). The impact of performance information on congressional appropriations. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(1), 100–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, R. F., & Oh, C. H. (2000). Rationality and use of information in policy decisions: A search for alternatives. Science Communication, 22(2), 173–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2013). Performance information use by politicians and public managers for internal control and external accountability purposes. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7-8), 502–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., Korac, S., Moser, B., & Rondo-Brovetto, P. (2019). How politicians use performance information in a budgetary context: New insights from the central government level. Public Administration, 97(4), 829–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1988). Micro-budgetary adaptations to fiscal stress in industrialized democracies. Public Administration Review, 48(1), 523–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (2007). Performance budgeting and accrual budgeting: Decision rules or analytic tools? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(2), 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, T. (2016). Performance budgeting practices and procedures. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 15(3), 65–136.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1958). Administrative behaviour. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stalebrink, O. J., & Frisco, V. (2011). PART in retrospect: An examination of legislators’ attitudes toward PART. Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(2), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Steccolini, I., Saliterer, I., & Guthrie, J. (2020). The role (s) of accounting and performance measurement systems in contemporary public administration. Public Administration, 98(1), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterck, M. (2007). The impact of performance budgeting on the role of the legislature: a four-country study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 189–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiefel, L., Rubenstein, R., & Schwartz, A. E. (1999). Using adjusted performance measures for evaluating resource use. Public Budgeting & Finance, 19(3), 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J. (2004). Politicians in search of performance information? Survey research on Dutch aldermen's use of performance information. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 221–252.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J., van Helden, G. J., & van der Kolk, B. (2015). Challenging the NPM ideas about performance management: selectivity and differentiation in outcome-oriented performance budgeting. Financial Accountability and Management, 31(3), 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W. V. (2004). Supply and demand of policy indicators. Public Management Review, 6(4), 511–530.
   Google Scholar
• van Helden, G. J., & Reichard, C. (2013). A meta-review of public sector performance management research. Tékhne, 11(1), 10–20.
   Google Scholar
• van Helden, J. (2016). Literature review and challenging research agenda on politicians’ use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 531–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2019). Making sense of the users of public sector accounting information and their needs. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 478–495.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2008). Convincing legislators with performance measures. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(6), 654–667.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-agent models: an expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 173–202.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1961). Political implications of budgetary reform. Public Administration Review, 21(4), 183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1978). A budget for all seasons? Why the traditional budget lasts. Public Administration Review, 38(6), 501–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar