Methods and recent advances in speciation analysis of mercury chemical species in environmental samples: a review

References

• Rafaj P, Bertok I, Cofala J, et al. Scenarios of global mercury emissions from anthropogenic sources. Atmos. Environ. 2013;79:472–479.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krystek P, Favaro P, Bode P, et al. Methyl mercury in nail clippings in relation to fish consumption analysis with gas chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a first orientation. Talanta. 2012;97:83–86.10.1016/j.talanta.2012.03.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Zheng J, Fang L, et al. Speciation analysis of mercury in natural water and fish samples by using capillary electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2012;89:280–285.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.12.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlackova L, Kruzikova K, Svobodova Z. Mercury speciation in fish muscles from major Czech rivers and assessment of health risks. Food Chem. 2014;150:360–365.10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarıca DY, Türker AR. Speciation and determination of inorganic mercury and methylmercury by headspace single drop microextraction and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry in water and fish. Clean – Soil Air Water. 2012;40:523–530.10.1002/clen.201100535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Shi Z, Long Z, et al. Determination and speciation of mercury in environmental and biological samples by analytical atomic spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2012;103:1–14.10.1016/j.microc.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korbas M, Macdonald TC, Pickering IJ, et al. Chemical form matters: differential accumulation of mercury following inorganic and organic mercury exposures in zebrafish larvae. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012;7:411–420.10.1021/cb200287c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin YG, Chen M, Peng JF, et al. Dithizone-functionalized solid phase extraction-displacement elution-high performance liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for mercury speciation in water samples. Talanta. 2010;81:1788–1792.10.1016/j.talanta.2010.03.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türker AR, Çabuk D, Yalçınkaya Ö. Preconcentration, speciation, and determination of mercury by solid phase extraction with cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Lett. 2013;46:1155–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Wu Y, Guo X, et al. Speciation of mercury in various samples from the micro-ecosystem of East Lake by hollow fiber-liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction-HPLC-ICP-MS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2015;30:875–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, He M, Chen B, et al. Automated dynamic hollow fiber liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction combined with capillary electrophoresis for speciation of mercury in biological and environmental samples. J. Chromatogr. A. 2015;1415:48–56.10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia X, Han Y, Liu X, et al. Speciation of mercury in water samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high performance liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2011;66:88–92.10.1016/j.sab.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang P, Yu J, Yang E, et al. Determination of mercury in food and water samples by displacement-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Anal. Method. 2015;8:236–242.10.1007/s12161-014-9899-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Li J, Lu W, et al. Speciation analysis of mercury in water samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled to capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2014;35:474–481.10.1002/elps.201300409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng G, Yin H, Li S, et al. Speciation analysis of mercury in sediments using vortex-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography–cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Talanta. 2012;99:631–636.10.1016/j.talanta.2012.06.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amde M, Liu J-F, Tan Z-Q, et al. Ionic liquid-based zinc oxide nanofluid for vortex assisted liquid liquid microextraction of inorganic mercury in environmental waters prior to cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectroscopic detection. Talanta. 2016;149:341–346.10.1016/j.talanta.2015.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinis EM, Wuilloud RG. Cold vapor ionic liquid-assisted headspace single-drop microextraction: a novel preconcentration technique for mercury species determination in complex matrix samples. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2010;25:1432.10.1039/c004678g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Pereira F, Lavilla I, Bendicho C, et al. Speciation of mercury by ionic liquid-based single-drop microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detection. Talanta. 2009;78:537–541.10.1016/j.talanta.2008.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan C-G, Lin K, Chang A. Determination of trace mercury in environmental samples by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry after cloud point extraction. Microchim. Acta. 2010;171:313–319.10.1007/s00604-010-0429-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Yin Y, Li Y, et al. Occurrence of monoethylmercury in the Florida Everglades: identification and verification. Environ. Pollut. 2010;158:3378–3384.10.1016/j.envpol.2010.07.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä H, Perämäki P, Piispanen J, et al. Determination of methyl mercury in humic-rich natural water samples using N2-distillation with isotope dilution and on-line purge and trap GC-ICP-MS. Microchem. J. 2014;112:113–118.10.1016/j.microc.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Wang Y, Li B, et al. Distribution and speciation of heavy metals in surface sediments from the Yangtze estuary and coastal areas. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012;69:1537–1547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor VF, Carter A, Davies C, et al. Trace-level automated mercury speciation analysis. Anal. Methods. 2011;3:1143–1148.10.1039/c0ay00528b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia XY, Gong DR, Han Y, et al. Fast speciation of mercury in seawater by short-column high-performance liquid chromatography hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma spectrometry after on-line cation exchange column preconcentration. Talanta. 2012;88:724–729.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.10.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Han C, Cheng H, et al. Rapid speciation analysis of mercury in seawater and marine fish by cation exchange chromatography hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2013;1314:86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Wu C, Shen L, et al. Online anion exchange column preconcentration and high performance liquid chromatographic separation with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection for mercury speciation analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014;828:9–16.10.1016/j.aca.2014.04.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Zhu Z, Zheng H, et al. Plasma jet desorption atomization-atomic fluorescence spectrometry and its application to mercury speciation by coupling with thin layer chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2012;84:10170–10174.10.1021/ac3028504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai X, Wang Y, Hou X, et al. Advanced oxidation using Fe(3)O(4) magnetic nanoparticles and its application in mercury speciation analysis by high performance liquid chromatography–cold vapor generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Analyst. 2013;138:3494–3501.10.1039/c3an00010a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten HFV, de Wit HA, Harman C, et al. Effects of sample preservation and storage on mercury speciation in natural stream water. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2014;94:381–384.10.1080/03067319.2013.823489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold K, Foulkes M, Worsfold P. Methods for the determination and speciation of mercury in natural waters – a review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2010;663:127–138.10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Li YF, Zhao J, et al. Nanomaterial-based approaches for the detection and speciation of mercury. Analyst. 2015;140:7841–7853.10.1039/C5AN01519G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker JL, Bloom NS. Preservation and storage techniques for low-level aqueous mercury speciation. Sci. Total Environ. 2005;337:253–263.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devai RD, Delaune WHP, Jr., Gambrell RP. Changes in methylmercury concentration during storage: effect of temperature. Org. Geochem. 2001;32:755–758.10.1016/S0146-6380(01)00039-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L-P, Yan X-P. Factors affecting the stability of inorganic and methylmercury during sample storage. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2003;22:245–253.10.1016/S0165-9936(03)00407-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten HF, de Wit HA, Fjeld E, et al. Environmental factors influencing mercury speciation in Subarctic and Boreal lakes. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;476–477:336–345.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajabi HR, Shamsipur M, Zahedi MM, et al. On-line flow injection solid phase extraction using imprinted polymeric nanobeads for the preconcentration and determination of mercury ions. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;259:330–337.10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Peng M, Hou X, et al. Improved hollow fiber supported liquid–liquid–liquid membrane microextraction for speciation of inorganic and organic mercury by capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Methods. 2013;5:1185–1191.10.1039/c2ay26214b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brombach C-C, Chen B, Corns WT, et al. Methylmercury in water samples at the pg/L level by online preconcentration liquid chromatography cold vapor-atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2015;105:103–108.10.1016/j.sab.2014.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudero LB, Olsina RA, Wuilloud RG. Polymer-supported ionic liquid solid phase extraction for trace inorganic and organic mercury determination in water samples by flow injection-cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta. 2013;116:133–140.10.1016/j.talanta.2013.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Chen M, Chen X, et al. Thiol-rich polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane as a novel adsorbent for mercury adsorption and speciation. Chem. Eng. J. 2014;242:62–68.10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B-H. Rapid speciation analysis of mercury by short column capillary electrophoresis on-line coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods. 2011;3:116–121.10.1039/C0AY00480D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang G, Li L, Jiang X, et al. Thiol-modified magnetic silica sorbent for the determination of trace mercury in environmental water samples coupled with cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Lett. 2013;46:706–716.10.1080/00032719.2012.726679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán-Mar JL, Hinojosa-Reyes L, Serra AM, et al. Applicability of multisyringe chromatography coupled to cold-vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry for mercury speciation analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2011;708:11–18.10.1016/j.aca.2011.09.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Ye M, Tang X, et al. Ionic liquids dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and HPLC-atomic fluorescence spectrometric determination of mercury species in environmental waters. J. Sep. Sci. 2013;36:414–420.10.1002/jssc.201200571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarafraz-Yazdi A, Fatehyan E, Amiri A. Determination of mercury in real water samples using in situ derivatization followed by sol–gel–solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2014;52:81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Noh S, Lee Y-G, et al. Mercury and methylmercury flux estimation and sediment distribution in an industrialized urban bay. Mar. Chem. 2014;158:59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold K, Foulkes M, Worsfold PJ. Preconcentration techniques for the determination of mercury species in natural waters. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2009;28:426–435.10.1016/j.trac.2009.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelcová P, Dočekalová H, Kleckerová A. Development of the diffusive gradient in thin films technique for the measurement of labile mercury species in waters. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014;819:42–48.10.1016/j.aca.2014.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Gómez C, Dimock B, Hintelmann H, et al. Development of the DGT technique for Hg measurement in water: comparison of three different types of samplers in laboratory assays. Chemosphere. 2011;85:1452–1457.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelcová P, Dočekalová H, Kleckerová A. Determination of mercury species by the diffusive gradient in thin film technique and liquid chromatography–atomic fluorescence spectrometry after microwave extraction. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2015;866:21–26.10.1016/j.aca.2015.01.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Kucharzyk KH, Kim B, et al. Net methylation of mercury in estuarine sediment microcosms amended with dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:9133–9141.10.1021/es500336j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramescu ML, Zhu J, Yumvihoze E, et al. Simplified sample preparation procedure for measuring isotope-enriched methylmercury by gas chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010;29:1256–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YR, Wang RQ, Xue T, et al. Effects of soil properties and flooding on the mobility and transformation of mercury in a temperate riparian wetland. Soil Sediment Contam.: Int. J. 2015;24:191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzano R, Santoro A, Spagnuolo M, et al. Solving mercury (Hg) speciation in soil samples by synchrotron X-ray microspectroscopic techniques. Environ. Pollut. 2010;158:2702–2709.10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojdová M, Rohovec J, Chrastný V, et al. The influence of sample drying procedures on mercury concentrations analyzed in soils. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015;94:570–576.10.1007/s00128-015-1521-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Ma X. Speciation analysis of mercury in water samples using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2011;702:50–55.10.1016/j.aca.2011.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spietelun A, Marcinkowski Ł, de la Guardia M, et al. Green aspects, developments and perspectives of liquid phase microextraction techniques. Talanta. 2014;119:34–45.10.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanisz E, Werner J, Matusiewicz H. Mercury species determination by task specific ionic liquid-based ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with cold vapour generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2013;110:28–35.10.1016/j.microc.2013.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andruch V, Burdel M, Kocúrová L, et al. Application of ultrasonic irradiation and vortex agitation in solvent microextraction. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2013;49:1–19.10.1016/j.trac.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng G, Chen W, Wang Y. Speciation analysis of mercury in sediments using ionic-liquid-based vortex-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2015;38:2684–2691.10.1002/jssc.v38.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asensio-Ramos M, Ravelo-Pérez LM, González-Curbelo MA, et al. Liquid phase microextraction applications in food analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011;1218:7415–7437.10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno F, García-Barrera T, Gómez-Ariza JL. Simultaneous speciation and preconcentration of ultra trace concentrations of mercury and selenium species in environmental and biological samples by hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction prior to high performance liquid chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2013;1300:43–50.10.1016/j.chroma.2013.02.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannot MA, Przyjazny A, Kokosa JM. Single drop microextraction – development, applications and future trends. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:2326–2336.10.1016/j.chroma.2009.10.089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong X, Qi X, Liu J, et al. Comparison of modifiers for mercury speciation in water by solid phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatography–atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Anal. Lett. 2014;47:2417–2430.10.1080/00032719.2014.910667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo SI, Alonso EV, Pavón JMC, et al. Use of a new enrichment nanosorbent for speciation of mercury by FI-CV-ICP-MS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2015;30:2429–2440.10.1039/C5JA00335K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, He M, Chen B, et al. Magnetic solid phase extraction coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the speciation of mercury in environmental water and human hair samples. Talanta. 2016;146:93–99.10.1016/j.talanta.2015.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Reino MP, Rodríguez-Fernández R, Peña-Vázquez E, et al. Mercury speciation in seawater by liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry following solid phase extraction pre-concentration by using an ionic imprinted polymer based on methyl–mercury–phenobarbital interaction. J. Chromatogr. A. 2015;1391:9–17.10.1016/j.chroma.2015.02.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yordanova T, Dakova I, Balashev K, et al. Polymeric ion-imprinted nanoparticles for mercury speciation in surface waters. Microchem. J. 2014;113:42–47.10.1016/j.microc.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Yang W, Zheng C, et al. On-line preconcentration and in situ photochemical vapor generation in coiled reactor for speciation analysis of mercury and methylmercury by atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2011;26:126–132.10.1039/C0JA00137F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ML, Ma HJ, Zhang SQ, et al. Mercury speciation with L-cysteine functionalized cellulose fibre as adsorbent by atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2011;26:613–617.10.1039/c0ja00185f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneado S, Peró-Gascón R, Ibáñez-Palomino C, et al. Mercury(ii) and methylmercury determination in water by liquid chromatography hyphenated to cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry after online short-column preconcentration. Anal. Methods. 2015;7:2699–2706.10.1039/C4AY02929A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä H, Perämäki P, Piispanen J, et al. Determination of low methylmercury concentrations in peat soil samples by isotope dilution GC-ICP-MS using distillation and solvent extraction methods. Chemosphere. 2015;124:47–53.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrone N, Sharif A, Monperrus M, et al, Determination of methyl mercury and inorganic mercury in natural waters at the pgL−1 level: intercomparison between PT-GC-Pyr-AFS and GC-ICP-MS using ethylation or propylation derivatization. E3S Web of Conferences. 2013;1. 09001. Available from: http://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2013/01/e3sconf_ichm13_09001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jagtap R, Krikowa F, Maher W, et al. Measurement of methyl mercury (I) and mercury (II) in fish tissues and sediments by HPLC-ICPMS and HPLC-HGAAS. Talanta. 2011;85:49–55.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevado JJ, Martin-Doimeadios RC, Krupp EM, et al. Comparison of gas chromatographic hyphenated techniques for mercury speciation analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011;1218:4545–4551.10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadlecova M, Daye M, Ouddane B. Improvement in determination of methylmercury in sediments by headspace trap gas chromatography and atomic fluorescence spectrometry after organic extraction and aqueous phase ethylation. Anal. Lett. 2014;47:697–706.10.1080/00032719.2013.848364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, De Craemer S, Baeyens W. A novel method for the determination of dissolved methylmercury concentrations using diffusive gradients in thin films technique. Talanta. 2014;120:470–474.10.1016/j.talanta.2013.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-H, Kim K-H, Yoon H-O, et al. The application of gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry to the analysis of monomethyl mercury at sub-picogram levels. Microchem. J. 2013;110:107–112.10.1016/j.microc.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timerbaev AR. Element speciation analysis using capillary electrophoresis: twenty years of development and applications. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:778–812.10.1021/cr300199v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Zhang X, Hu B. Phase transfer membrane supported liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction combined with large volume sample injection capillary electrophoresis–ultraviolet detection for the speciation of inorganic and organic mercury. J. Chromatogr. A. 2011;1218:9414–9421.10.1016/j.chroma.2011.10.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Liu Y, Liu J, et al. Determination of methylmercury and inorganic mercury by volatile species generation-flameless/flame atomization-atomic fluorescence spectrometry without chromatographic separation. Anal. Methods. 2012;4:1122–1125.10.1039/c2ay05886c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Kou L, Jia J, et al. Metal-organic frameworks of zeolitic imidazolate framework-7 and zeolitic imidazolate framework-60 for fast mercury and methylmercury speciation analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2013;804:240–245.10.1016/j.aca.2013.09.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini L, Rodriguez-Loureiro I, Correa-Duarte MA, et al. Chemical speciation of heavy metals by surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy: identification and quantification of inorganic- and methyl-mercury in water. Nanoscale. 2014;6:8368–8375.10.1039/c4nr01464b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Li J, Chen L. Colorimetric detection of mercury species based on functionalized gold nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:15897–15904.10.1021/am503531c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhang B, Qian X, et al. Simultaneous quantification of Hg(2+) and MeHg(+) in aqueous media with a single fluorescent probe by multiplexing in the time domain. Anal. Chem. 2014;86:11919–11924.10.1021/ac503900w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q, Nagi R, Sadeghi K, et al. Detection and spatial mapping of mercury contamination in water samples using a smart-phone. ACS Nano. 2014;8:1121–1129.10.1021/nn406571t
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis AT, Coelho JP, Rodrigues SM, et al. Development and validation of a simple thermo-desorption technique for mercury speciation in soils and sediments. Talanta. 2012;99:363–368.10.1016/j.talanta.2012.05.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Chen B, Mao Y, et al. Possible alkylation of inorganic Hg(II) by photochemical processes in the environment. Chemosphere. 2012;88:8–16.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusilao-Makiese JG, Tessier E, Amouroux D, et al. Seasonal distribution and speciation of mercury in a gold mining area, north-west province. S. Afr., Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2014;96:387–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendicho C, Lavilla I, Pena-Pereira F, et al. Green chemistry in analytical atomic spectrometry: a review. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2012;27:1831.10.1039/c2ja30214d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar