Designing for assembly quality: strategies, guidelines and techniques

References

• Andreasen , M. M. and Ahm , T. 1988 . Flexible Assembly Systems , London : IFS/Springer-Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Arajou , C. S. , Benedetto-Neto , H. , Campello , A. C. , Segre , F. M. and Wright , I. C. 1993 . The utilisation of product development methods: a survey of UK industry . J. Eng. Design , 7 ( 3 ) : 265 – 278 .
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin , D. F. , Abell , T. E. , Lui , M. , Defazio , T , L. and Whitney , D. E. 1991 . An integrated computer aid for generating and evaluating assembly sequences for mechanical products . IEEE Trans. Robotics Automation , 7 ( 1 ) : 78 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Barnes , C. J. , Dalgleish , G. , Jared , G. , Swift , K. G. and Tate , S. Assembly sequence structures in design for assembly. In . Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning . pp. 164 – 169 . California : Marina del Rey .
   Google Scholar
• Beall , G. 1997 . “ The dangers of part consolidation ” . Available online at: www.immnet.com/articlelibrary/archive (accessed 16 October 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd , G. 1999 . “ Quality and automation will shape design ” . Available online at: www.assemblymag.com (accessed 16 October 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd , G. , Dewhurst , P. and Knight , W. 1994 . Product Design for Manufacture & Assembly , New York : Marcel Dekker .
   Google Scholar
• Bralla , J. G. 1998 . Design for Manufacturability Handbook , 2nd edition , Edited by: Bralla , J. G. New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Brannan , B. 1991 . DFA cuts assembly defects by 80% . Appliance Manufacture , November : 12 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Carter , A. D.S. 1986 . Mechanical Reliability , 2nd edition , London : Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Chase , K. W. , Magleby , S. P. and Gao , J. 1997 . “ Tolerance analysis of two- and three-dimensional mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments ” . In Advanced Tolerancing Techniques , Edited by: Zhang , H. New York : Wiley Interscience .
   Google Scholar
• Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motors, General Motors Corporation . February 1995 . Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)—Reference Manual , 2nd edition February ,
   Google Scholar
• Creveling , C. M. 1997 . Tolerance Design—A Handbook for Developing Optimal Specifications , Reading, Massachusetts : Addison Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• Das , S. K. , Datla , V. and Gami , S. 2000 . DFQM—an approach for improving the quality of assembled products . Int. J. Product. Res. , 38 ( 2 ) : 457 – 477 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fazio , T. and Whitney , D. 1987 . Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences . Robotics Automation , 3 ( 6 ) : 640 – 658 .
   Google Scholar
• Gupta , S. , Das , D. , Regli , W. C. and Nau , D. S. 1997 . Automated manufacturability analysis: a survey . Res. Eng. Design—Theory Applications Concurrent Eng. , 9 ( 3 ) : 168 – 190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris , D. H. and Chaney , F. B. 1969 . Human Factors in Quality Assuarance , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Hinckley , M. 1993 . “ A global conformance quality model—a new strategic tool for minimizing defects casued by variation, error and complexity ” . CA : Stanford University . PhD thesis
   Google Scholar
• Hinckely , C. M. 1997 . “ The quality question ” . available online at: www.assemblymag.com (accessed 16 October 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Huang , G. Q. 1996 . Design for X—Concurrent Engineering Imperatives , Edited by: Huang , G. Q. London : Chapman & Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys , D. and Leaney , P. G. 2000 . Dimensional control as an integral part of next-generation aircraft development . Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs., Part B , 214 : 831 – 835 .
   Google Scholar
• Leaney , P. G. 1996 . “ Case experience with Hitachi, Lucas and Boothroyd–Dewhurst DFA methods ” . In Design for X—Concurrent Engineering Imperatives , Edited by: Huang , G. Q. London : Chapman Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , S. , Yi , C. and Suarez , R. Assemblability analysis with adjusting cost evaluation based on tolerance and adjustability . Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning . CA : Marina del Rey .
   Google Scholar
• Lotter , B. 1989 . Manufacturing Assembly Handbook , Oxford : Butterworths .
   Google Scholar
• Mendes , L. A.G. and Trabasso , L. G. Evaluation of assembly sequence within the DFA—design for assembly. In . Proceedings of 2001 International Forum on DFMA: Concepts for the New Millenium . June . pp. 4 – 6 . RI : Newport .
   Google Scholar
• Noori , H. and Radford , R. 1995 . Production and Operations Management: Total Quality and Responsiveness , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Pahl , G. and Beitz , W. 1996 . Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 2nd edition , London : Design Council .
   Google Scholar
• Purohit , K. and Sharma , C. S. 1999 . Recent developments in tolerancing techniques . Defence Sci. J. , 49 ( 4 ) : 291 – 298 .
   Google Scholar
• Redford , A. 1994 . Design for assembly . Eur. Designer , Sept/Oct : 12 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Redford , A. and Lo , E. 1986 . Robots in Assembly , Milton Keynes : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson , A. C. Assemblability based on maximum likelihood configuration of tolerances . Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning . pp. 96 – 102 . CA : Marina del Rey .
   Google Scholar
• Shafer , D. A. 1999 . Successful Assembly Automation: A Development and Implementation Guide , Dearborn : SME .
   Google Scholar
• Shibata , H. , Chelelin , B. and Ishii , K. Assembly quality methodology: an application to the defect proediction to audio equipment assembled at various manufacturing sites . Proceedings of ASME DETC’01 . PA : Pittsburgh . paper no. DETC2001/DFM-21194
   Google Scholar
• Shimada , J. , Mikakawa , S. and Ohashi , T. 1992 . “ Design for manufacture, tools and methods: the assemblability evaulation method (AEM) ” . In FISITA ‘92 Congress London no. C389/460
   Google Scholar
• Shimbun , N. K. 1988 . Poka-yoke: Improving Product Quality by Preventing Defects , Portland, Oregon : Productivity Press Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Sporovieri , J. 1998 . “ Justifying automation ” . Available online at: www.assemblymag.com (accessed 16 October 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki , T. , Ohashi , T. , Asano , M. and Miyakawa , S. The assembly reliability evaluation method (AREM) shop evaluation method . Proceedings of 2001 International Forum on DFMA: Concepts for the New Millenium . June . pp. 4 – 6 . RI : Newport .
   Google Scholar
• Swift , K. G. , Raines , M. and Booker , J. D. 1997 . Design capability and the costs of failure . Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., Part B , 211 : 409 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift , K. G. , Raines , M. and Booker , J. D. 1999 . Analysis of product capability at the design stage . J. Eng. Design , 10 ( 1 ) : 77 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton , A. C. , Doneelly , S. and Ertan , B. 2000 . More than just robust design: why product development orgainzations still contend with variation and its impact on quality . Res. Eng. Design-Theory, Applications Concurrent Eng. , 12 ( 3 ) : 127 – 143 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman , D. G. 2001 . The Mechanical Design Process , 3rd edition , New York : McGraw Hill .
   Google Scholar
• van Wie , M. J. , Greer , J. L. , Campbell , M. , Stone , R. B. and Wood , K. L. Interfaces and product architecture . Proceedings of ASME DETC’01 . September . pp. 9 – 12 . PA : Pittsburgh . paper no. DETC2001/DTM-21689
   Google Scholar
• Vasseur , H. , Kurfess , T. R. and Cagan , J. 1992 . A decision-analytic method for competitive design for quality . Adv. Design Automation , 1 : 329 – 336 . (DE-Vol. 44-1)
   Google Scholar
• Wang , J. and Trolio , M. Predicting quality in early product development . Proceedings of 3rd Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theories, Applications and Practic . 28–31 December . pp. 1 – 9 . Hong Kong
   Google Scholar
• Whitney , D. E. and Shukla , G. A design procedure applicable to different classes of assemblies . Proceedings of ASME DETC’01 . PA : Pittsburgh . paper no. DETC2001/CIE-21304
   Google Scholar
• Wickman , C. and Söderberg , R. Defining quality appearance index weights by combining VR and CAT technologies . Proceedings of ASME DETC’01 . PA : Pittsburgh . paper no. DETC2001/DFM-21194
   Google Scholar
• Zhang , Z. and Fang , X. D. 1996 . Fit capability indices and their applications . Int. J. Production Res. , 34 ( 11 ) : 3079 – 3094 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar