Comparative analysis of coupling modularity metrics

References

• Allen , K. and Carlson-Skalak , S. Defining product architecture during conceptual design . ASME design engineering technical conference, design theory and methodology conference, DETC1998 . September 13–16 . Atlanta , GA Paper No. DETC98/DTM-5650
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin , C. Y. and Clark , K. B. 2000 . Design rules: the power of modularity , Cambridge : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Browning , T. 2009 . The many views of a process: toward a process architecture framework for product development processes . Systems Engineering , 12 ( 1 ) : 69 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning , T. R. 2001 . Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 48 ( 3 ) : 292 – 306 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celona , T. , Embry-Perline , C. and Hölttä-Otto , K. Are modular products larger than integral products? . August 28–31 . International conference on engineering design, ICED07 , Paris , , France
   Google Scholar
• Chiriac , N. 2011a . Level of modularity at different levels of system granularity . ASME Journal of Mechanical Design , 133 ( 10 ) 101007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiriac , N. Three approaches to complex system decomposition . 13th international dependency and structure modelling conference, DSM’11 . September 14–15 . Cambridge , MA
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson , J. P. , Simons , C. and Eckert , C. 2004 . Predicting change propagation in complex design . Journal of Mechanical Design , 126 ( 5 ) : 788 – 798 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter , S. L. Identification of limiting factors for improving design modularity . ASME design engineering technical conferences, DETC1998 . September 13–16 . Atlanta , GA Paper No. DETC98/DTM-5659
   Google Scholar
• Dahmus , J. B. , Gonzalez-Zugasti , J. P. and Otto , K. N. 2001 . Modular product architecture . Design Studies , 22 ( 5 ) : 409 – 424 .
   Google Scholar
• Design Repository [online]. Available from: http://designengineeringlab.org/delabsite/repository.html [Accessed 21 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Engel , A. and Browning , T. 2008 . Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options . Systems Engineering , 11 ( 2 ) : 125 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppinger , S. 1994 . A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development . Research in Engineering Design , 6 ( 1 ) : 1 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson , A. and Erixon , G. 1999 . Controlling design variants: modular product platforms , New York : ASME Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fixson , S. 2005 . Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions . Journal of Operations Management , 23 ( 3–4 ) : 345 – 369 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenson , J. K. , Prasad , G. J. and Zhang , Y. 1999 . Modular product design: a life cycle review . Transactions of the SDPS , 3 ( 4 ) : 13 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Gershenson , J. K. , Prasad , J. K. and Zhang , Y. 2004 . Product modularity: measures and design methods . Journal of Engineering Design , 15 ( 1 ) : 33 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giffin , M. 2009 . Change propagation analysis in complex technical systems . Journal of Mechanical Design , 131 ( 8 ) 081010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo , F. and Gershenson , J. K. Comparison of modular measurement methods based on consistency analysis and sensitivity analysis . ASME 2003 design engineering technical conferences, DETC2003 . September 2–6 . Chicago , IL Paper No. DETC2003/DTM-48634
   Google Scholar
• Guo , F. and Gershenson , J. K. A comparison of modular product design methods on improvement and iteration . ASME design engineering technical conferences, DETC2004 . Salt Lake City , UT Paper No. DETC2004/DTM-57396, 28 September–2 October
   Google Scholar
• Helmer , R. , Yassine , A. and Meier , C. 2010 . Systematic module and interface definition using component design structure matrix . Journal of Engineering Design , 21 ( 6 ) : 647 – 675 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölttä , K. and Otto , K. 2005 . Incorporating design effort complexity measures in product architectural design and assessment . Design Studies , 26 ( 5 ) : 445 – 564 .
   Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto , K. and De Weck , O. 2007 . Degree of modularity in engineering systems and products with technical and business constraints . Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application , 15 ( 2 ) : 113 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang , C.-C. and Kusiak , A. 1998 . Modularity in design of products and systems . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part A , 28 ( 1 ) : 66 – 77 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , M. and Ishii , K. 2000 . Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architecture . Research in Engineering Design , 13 ( 4 ) : 213 – 235 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson , C. A. and Magleby , S. P. The influence of product modularity during concept selection of consumer products . ASME design engineering technical conferences, DETC2001 . September 9–12 . Pittsburgh , PA Paper No. DETC2001/DTM-21712
   Google Scholar
• Mikkola , J. and Gassmann , O. 2003 . Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 50 ( 2 ) : 204 – 218 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb , P. J. , Bras , B. and Rosen , D. W. 1998 . Implication of modularity on product design for the life cycle . ASME Journal of Mechanical Design , 120 ( 3 ) : 483 – 490 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Grady , P. 1999 . The age of modularity , Iowa City , IA : Adams and Steele .
   Google Scholar
• Otto , K. and Wood , K. 2001 . Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development , Upper Saddle River , NJ : Prentice-Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Pahl , G. and Beitz , W. 1996 . Engineering design: a systematic approach , New York : Springer-Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Sharman , D. M. and Yassine , A. 2007 . Architectural valuation using the design structure matrix and real options theory . Concurrent Engineering , 15 ( 2 ) : 157 – 173 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique , Z. , Rosen , D. W. and Wang , N. On the applicability of product variety design concepts to automotive platform commonality . ASME design engineering technical conferences, conference on design theory and methodology, DETC1998 . September 13–16 . Atlanta , GA Paper No. DETC98/DTM-5661
   Google Scholar
• Simpson , T. W. 2004 . Product platform design and customization: status and promise . Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , 18 ( 1 ) : 3 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson , T. W. Platform-based design and development: current trends and needs in industry . ASME international design engineering technical conferences, iDETC2006 . September 10–13 . Philadelphia , PA Paper No. DETC2006-99-229
   Google Scholar
• Smaling , R. and de Weck , O. 2007 . Assessing risks and opportunities of technology infusion in system design . Journal of System Engineering , 10 ( 1 ) : 1 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa , M. E. 2008 . Structured approach to predicting and managing technical interactions in software development . Research in Engineering Design , 19 ( 1 ) : 47 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa , M. E. and Eppinger , S. D. 2003 . Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions . ASME Journal of Mechanical Design , 125 ( 2 ) : 240 – 252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa , M. E. , Eppinger , S. D. and Rowles , C. M. Designing modular and integrative systems . ASME Design Technical Conferences, DETC2000 . September 10–13 . Baltimore , MD Paper No. DETC2000/DTM-14571
   Google Scholar
• Sosa , M. E. , Eppinger , S. D. and Rowles , C. M. 2007 . A network appraoch to define modularity of components in complex products . ASME Journal of Mechanical Design , 129 ( 11 ) : 1118 – 1129 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward , D. T. 1981 . The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 28 ( 3 ) : 71 – 74 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh , E. S. 2010 . Technology infusion for complex systems: a framework and case study . Systems Engineering , 13 ( 2 ) : 186 – 203 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich , K. T. 1995 . The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm . Research Policy , 24 ( 3 ) : 419 – 440 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich , K. T. and Eppinger , S. D. 2004 . Product design and development , 3 , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Van Eikema Hommes , Q. Comparison and application of metrics that define the components modularity in complex products . ASME 2008 international design engineering technical conferences, iDETC2008 . August 3–6 . Brooklyn , NY Paper No. DETC2008/DTM-49140
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield , R. I. , Smith , J. S. and Duffy , A. H. Identifying component modules . Seventh international conference on artificial intelligence in design (AID’02) . July 15–17 . pp. 571 – 592 . Cambridge , , UK
   Google Scholar
• Whitney , D. E. 2003 . Physical limits to modularity , Cambridge : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engnineering Systems Division .
   Google Scholar
• Whitney , D. E. Introducing knowledge-based engineering into an interconnected product development process . ASME 1999 international design engineering technical conferences, iDETC1999 . September 12–15 . Las Vegas , NV Paper No. DETC99/DTM-8741
   Google Scholar
• Yu , T.-L. , Yassine , A. and Goldberg , D. E. 2005 . An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms , Urbana-Champlain : University of Illinois . Department of General Engineering; Urbana-Champlain: Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory IlliGAL.
   Google Scholar
• Yu , T.-L. , Yassine , A. A. and Goldberg , D. E. 2007 . An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms . Research in Engineering Design , 18 ( 2 ) : 91 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar