A high-definition design structure matrix (HDDSM) for the quantitative assessment of product architecture

References

• Albers , A. 2011 . System architecture modeling in a software tool based on the Contact and Channel Approach (C&C-A) . Journal of Mechanical Design , 133 ( 10 ) : 101006 (8 pages).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizon , F. Three dimensional design structure matrix with cross-module and cross-interface analyses . ASME IDETC Design Automation Conference . Las Vegas , NV . Paper Number: DETC2007-34510.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasen , M. M. 2011 . 45 years with design methodology . Journal of Engineering Design , 22 ( 5 ) : 293 – 332 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd , G. , Dewhurst , P. and Knight , W. 2002 . Product design for manufacture and assembly , 2 , New York , NY : Marcel Dekker .
   Google Scholar
• Browning , T. R. 2001 . Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 48 ( 3 ) : 292 – 306 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson , P. J. , Simons , C. and Eckert , C. 2004 . Predicting change propagation in complex design . Journal of Mechanical Design , 126 ( 5 ) : 788 – 797 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert , C. , Clarkson , P. and Zanker , W. 2004 . Change and customisation in complex engineering domains . Research in Engineering Design , 15 ( 1 ) : 1 – 21 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppinger , S. D. 1994 . A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development . Research in Engineering Design , 6 ( 1 ) : 1 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke , E. and Shulz , A. P. 2005 . Design for changeability (dfc): principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle . Systems Engineering , 8 ( 4 ) : 342 – 358 .
   Google Scholar
• Helmer , R. , Yassine , A. and Meier , C. 2010 . Systematic module and interface definition using component design structure matrix . Journal of Engineering Design , 21 ( 6 ) : 647 – 675 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtz , J. 2002 . A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts . Research in Engineering Design , 13 ( 2 ) : 65 – 82 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölttä , K. , Suh , E. S. and de Weck , O. Tradeoff between modularity and performance for engineered systems and products . International Conference on Engineering Design . Melbourne , Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao , S. W. and Liu , E. 2005 . A structural component-based approach for designing product family . Computers in Industry , 56 ( 1 ) : 13 – 28 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao , J. , Simpson , T. W. and Siddique , Z. 2007 . Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review . Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , 18 ( 1 ) : 5 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keese , D. Empirically-derived principles for designing products with flexibility for future evolution . ASME IDETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference . Las Vegas , NV Paper Number: DETC2007-35695.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchinsky , B. 2005 . Development of product flexibility principles for engineering design Thesis (MS). Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Luh , D.-B. , Ko , Y.-T. and Ma , C.-H. 2011 . A structural matrix-based modelling for designing product variety . Journal of Engineering Design , 22 ( 1 ) : 1 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , M. V. and Ishii , K. 2002 . Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures . Research in Engineering Design , 13 ( 4 ) : 213 – 235 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer , M. and Lindemann , U. The application of the Multiple-Domain Matrix . IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics . Singapore . pp. 2487 – 2493 .
   Google Scholar
• Otto , K. N. and Holtta-Otto , K. 2007 . A multi-criteria assessment tool for screening preliminary product platform concepts . Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , 18 ( 1 ) : 59 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto , K. N. and Wood , K. L. 2001 . Product design , Upper Saddle River , NJ : Prentice-Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Pimmler , T. U. and Eppinger , S. D. Integration analysis of product decompositions . ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference . Minneapolis , MN . pp. 343 – 351 .
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi , A. M. Principles of product flexibility . ASME IDETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference . Philadelphia , PA . Paper Number: DETC2006-99583.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell , R. and Gardiner , P. 1988 . Re-innovation and robust designs: producer and user benefits . Journal of Marketing Management , 3 ( 3 ) : 372 – 387 .
   Google Scholar
• Simpson , T. W. 2004 . Product platform design and customization: status and promise . Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing , 18 ( 1 ) : 3 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa , M. E. , Eppinger , S. D. and Rowles , C. M. 2003 . Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions . Journal of Mechanical Design , 125 ( 2 (June) : 240 – 252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward , D. V. 1981 . The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 28 ( 3 ) : 71 – 74 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone , R. , Wood , K. L. and Crawford , R. H. 2000 . A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architecture . Design Studies , 21 ( 1 ) : 5 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Suh , E. , Weck , O. and Chang , D. 2007 . Flexible product platforms: framework and case study . Research in Engineering Design , 18 ( 2 ) : 67 – 89 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilstra , A. 2010 . Representing product architecture and analyzing evolvable design characteristics , Dissertation (PhD). Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Tilstra , A. H. , Seepersad , C. C. and Wood , K. L. Distributed modeling of component DSM . International Design Structure Matrix Conference . Greenville , SC .
   Google Scholar
• Tilstra , A. , Seepersad , C. C. and Wood , K. L. The repeatability of high definition design structure matrix (HDDSM) models for representing product architecture . ASME IDETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference . Montreal , Quebec . Paper Number: DETC2010-28717.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich , K. 1995 . The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm . Research Policy , 24 ( 3 ) : 419 – 440 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warfield , J. N. 1973 . Binary matrices in system modeling . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC , 3 ( 5 ) : 441 – 449 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar