Extension of Electronic Device Description Language for analysing change impacts in modular automation in manufacturing plants

References

• Albers, A., D. C. Wynn, D. F. Wyatt, A. Braun, E. Sadowski, and P. J. Clarkson. 2011. “System Architecture Modeling in a Software Tool Based on the Contact and Channel Approach”. Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (10): 1–8. doi: 10.1115/1.4004971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmanninger, K., M. Seidl, and M. Wimmer. 2009. “A Survey on Model Versioning Approaches.” International Journal of Web Information Systems 5 (3): 271–304. doi: 10.1108/17440080910983556
   Google Scholar
• Bassi, L., C. Secchi, M. Bonfe, and C. Fantuzzi. 2011. “A SysML-Based Methodology for Manufacturing Machinery Modelling and Design.” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 16 (6): 1049–1062. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2010.2073480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendraou, R., J. Jézéquel, M.-P. Gervais, and X. Blanc. 2010. “A Comparison of Six UML-Based Languages for Software Process Modelling.” IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 36 (5): 662–675. doi: 10.1109/TSE.2009.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouikni, N., L. Rivest, and A. Desrochers. 2006. “A Product Feature Evolution Validation Model for Engineering Change Management.” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 6 (2): 188–195. doi: 10.1115/1.2194909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecher, C., S. Jeschke, G. Schuh, S. Aghassi, J. Arnoscht, F. Bauhoff, S. Fuchs, et al. 2012. “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries.” In Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries. Ed. C. Brecher, 17–72, Chapter 2. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, T. R. 2001. “Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (3): 292–306. doi: 10.1109/17.946528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., S. B. Navathe, and R. E. Fulton. 2000. “C-FAR, Change Favourable Representation.” International Journal of Computer-Aided Design 32 (5–6): 321–338. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danilovic, M., and T. R. Browning. 2007. “Managing Complex Product Development Projects with Design Structure Matrices and Domain Mapping Matrices.” International Journal of Project Management 25 (3): 300–314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Diedrich, Ch. 2004. “Integration Technologies of Field Devices in Distributed Control and Engineering Systems – the Field Device Instrumentation Technologies.” In The Industrial Information Technology Handbook. Ed. R. Zurawski, 71-1–71-24. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Drath, R., A. Lüder, J. Peschke, and L. Hundt. 2008. “AutomationML – the Glue Forseamless Aautomation Engineering.” Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 15th conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), Germany, 616–623.
   Google Scholar
• Du, X., J. Jiao, and M. Tseng. 2003. “Modelling Platform-Based Product Configuration Using Programmed Attributed Graph Grammars.” Journal of Engineering Design 14 (2): 145–167. doi: 10.1080/0954482031000091482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppinger, S. D., D. E. Whitney, R. P. Smith, and D. Gebala. 1994. “A Model Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development.” Research in Engineering Design 6 (1): 1–13. doi: 10.1007/BF01588087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estevez, E., and M. Marcos. 2012. “Model-Based Validation of Industrial Control Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 8 (2): 302–310. doi: 10.1109/TII.2011.2174248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedai, M., U. Epple, R. Drath, and A. Fay. 2003. “A Metamodel for Generic Data Exchange between Various CAE Systems.” Mathematical Modelling in Engineering: Theory, Numerics, Applications (MathMod), Wien, 1247–1255.
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann, S., K. Kernschmidt, and B. Vogel-Heuser. 2014. “Combining a SysML-Based Modeling Approach and Semantic Technologies for Analysing Change Influences in Manufacturing Plant Models.” 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (CMS), Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hadlich, T., M. Mühlhause, and C. Diedrich. 2010. “Discovery and Integration of Information in a Heterogeneous Environment.” IEEE international conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Bilbao, Spain, 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Helms, B., and K. Shea. 2012. “Computational Synthesis of Product Architectures Based on Object-Oriented Graph Grammars.” Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (2): 1–14. doi: 10.1115/1.4005592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtz, J., R. B. Stone, S. Szykman, D. A. McAdams, and K. L. Wood. 2002. “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts.” International Journal of Research in Engineering Design 13 (2): 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 61131-3. 2012. Programmable Controllers – Part 3: Programming Languages. 3rd ed. Berlin: Beuth-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 61499. 2005. DIN EN 61499-1: Function Blocks for Industrial Control Systems – Part 1: Architecture. Berlin: Beuth-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 61804-3. 2010. Function Block for Process Automation – Part 3: Electronic Device Description Language (EDDL). 2nd ed. Berlin: Beuth-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 62541-1. 2008. OPC Unified Architecture – Part 1: Overview and Concept. Berlin: Beuth-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrat, T. A. W., C. M. Eckert, N. H. M. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2011. “Engineering Change: An Overview and Perspective on the Literature.” Research in Engineering Design 22 (2): 103–124. doi: 10.1007/s00163-010-0097-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, K. H., and M. Tiegelkamp. 2010. “The Programming Languages of IEC 61131-3.” In IEC 61131-3: Programming Industrial Automation Systems. Ed. K. H. John, and M. Tiegelkamp, 99–205, Chapter 4. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Katzke, U., K. Fischer, and B. Vogel-Heuser. 2004. “Development and Evaluation of a Model for Modular Automation in Plant Manufacturing.” In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis (DITSA). Ed. H.-W. Chu, J. Aguilar, and J. Ferrer, 15–20. Orlando.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R., C. M. Eckert, and P. J. Clarkson. 2009. “Using an Engineering Change Methodology to Support Conceptual Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (6): 571–587. doi: 10.1080/09544820802086988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernschmidt, K., G. Bayrak, and B. Vogel-Heuser. 2012. “A Port-Based Approach for Modelling the Structure of Mechatronic Modules.” 14th international dependency and structure modelling conference (DSM’12), Kyoto, Japan, 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Legat, C., J. Folmer, and B. Vogel-Heuser. 2013: “Evaluation in Industrial Plant Automation: A Case Study.” 39th annual conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Wien, Austria, 4386–4391.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F., G. Bayrak, K. Kernschmidt, and B. Vogel-Heuser. 2012. “Specification of the Requirements to Support Information Technology-Cycles in the Machine and Plant Manufacturing Industry.” 14th IFAC symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (INCOM12), Bucharest, Romania, 1077–1082.
   Google Scholar
• Lüder, A., L. H. M. Foehr, T. Wagner, J. J. Zaddach, and T. Holm. 2010. “Manufacturing System Engineering with Mechatronical Units.” IEEE conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Bilbao, Spain, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Luh, D. B., Y. T. Ko, and C. H. Ma. 2011. “A Structure Matrix-Based Modelling for Designing Product Variety.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1080/09544820902877591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maga, C., N. Jazdi, and P. Göhner. 2011. “Reusable Models in Industrial Automation: Experiences in Defining Appropriate Levels of Granularity.” Proceedings of the 18th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 18 (1): 9145–9150.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtar, A., C. Bedard, and P. Fazio. 1998. “Information Model for Managing Design Changes in a Collaborative Environment.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 12 (2): 82–92. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1998)12:2(82)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morkos, B., P. Shankar, and J. D. Summers. 2012. “Predicting Requirement Change Propagation, Using Higher Order Design Structure Matrices: An Industry Case Study.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (12): 905–926.
   Google Scholar
• NE 148. 2013. Automation Requirements Relating to Modularisation of Process Plants. Leverkusen: NAMUR Version 22.10.2013.
   Google Scholar
• OCL. 2007: “UML 2.0 OCL Specification.” Accessed May 30, 2013. https://www.lri.fr/wolff/teach-material/2010-11/PolyTech-VnV/UML2.0OCL-specification.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, K., G. Böckle, and F. V. D. Linden. 2005. “Part II: Product Line Variability.” In Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques, edited by K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F. Linde, 57–88, Chapter 4. 1st ed. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rajlich, V. 2000. “Modelling Software Evolution by Evolving Interoperation Graphs.” Annals of Software Engineering 9 (1–2): 235–248. doi: 10.1023/A:1018933026438
   Google Scholar
• Rovegard, P., L. Angelis, and C. Wohlin. 2008. “An Empirical Study on Views of Importance of Change Impact Analysis Issues.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 34 (4): 516–530. doi: 10.1109/TSE.2008.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, J. H., G. Mark, and N. C. Jordan. 2009. “Flexibility: A Multi-Disciplinary Literature Review and a Research Agenda for Designing Flexible Engineering Systems.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (3): 307–323. doi: 10.1080/09544820701870813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schach, S. R., and A. Tomer. 2000. “A Maintenance-Orientated Approach to Software Construction.” Journal of Software Maintenance Research and Practice 12 (1): 25–45. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(200001/02)12:1<25::AID-SMR203>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. 2000. “Towards a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity.” Journal of Academy of Management Review 25 (2): 312–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFB 768. 2011. “Cycle Management in Innovation Processes.” In DFG Forschungsprojekt Sonderforschungsbereich 768. Ed. U. Lindemann, 1–5. Munich: TU München.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. 2001. “Methods for Field Instrumentation of the Distributed Systems.” PhD thesis diss., University of Magdeburg.
   Google Scholar
• Stetter, R. 2012. “Software in Mechanical Engineering – Annoying Appendage or an Opportunity for Leadership?” Accessed October 25, 2012. http://www.softwarekompetenz.de/servlet/is/21700/StetterSW_im_Maschinenbau.pdf?command=downloadContent&filename=Stetter-SW_im_Maschinenbau.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steward, D. V. 1981. “The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 28 (3): 71–74. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1998. “Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems.” Journal of Research in Engineering Design 10 (4): 189–209. doi: 10.1007/s001639870001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svahnberg, M., J. van Gurp, and J. Bosch. 2005. “A Taxonomy of Variability Realization Techniques.” Journal of Software-Practice & Experience 35 (8): 705–754. doi: 10.1002/spe.652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, D. B., R. H. Xu, J. C. H. Tang, and R. He. 2008. “Design Structure Matrix-Based Engineering Change Management for Product Development.” International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services 1 (3): 231–245. doi: 10.1504/IJIMS.2008.021196
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and C. H. Loch. 1999. “Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (2): 160–172. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00041-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thramboulidis, K. 2010. “The 3+1 SysML View-Model in Model Integrated Mechatronics.” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications 3 (2): 109–118. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2010.32014
   Google Scholar
• Thramboulidis, K. 2013. “IEC 61499 vs. 61131: A Comparison Based on Misperceptions.” Journal of Software Engineering & Application 6 (6): 405–417. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2013.68050
   Google Scholar
• Upton, D. M. 1995. “What Really Makes Factories Flexible?” Harvard Business Review 73 (4): 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyatkin, V. 2011. “IEC 61499 as Enabler of Distributed and Intelligent Automation: State of the Art Review.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7 (4): 768–780. doi: 10.1109/TII.2011.2166785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfechtel, B., B. P. Munch, and R. Conradi. 2001. “A Layered Architecture for Uniform Version Management.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27 (12): 1111–1133. doi: 10.1109/32.988710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyrich, M., and P. Klein. 2012. “Engineering of Automated Manufacturing Systems with Mechatronic Objects.” 38th conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Montreal, Canada, 6166–6171.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, D. C., M. Kremeyer, P. J. Clarkson, and U. Lindemann. 2012. “Dependency Modelling in Complex System Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (10–11): 718–721. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.714530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziadi, T., and J. M. Jezequel. 2006. “Software Product Line Engineering with the UML: Deriving Products.” In Software Product Lines. Ed. T. Käkölä, and J. C. Duenas, 557–586, Chapter 15. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar