A foundational observation method for studying design situations

References

• Adair, J. G. 1984. “The Hawthorne Effect: A Reconsideration of the Methodological Artifact.” Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (2): 334–345. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelman, L. 1991. “Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Case Studies: A Review of Empirical Methods for Evaluating Decision Support Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21 (2): 293–301. doi: 10.1109/21.87078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, N. E., and J. M. Ostrove. 2006. “Socioeconomic Status and Health: What We Know and What We Don't.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 896 (1): 3–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, S., J. Steele, S. Macmillan, P. Kirby, and R. Spence. 2001. “Mapping the Conceptual Design Activity of Interdisciplinary Teams.” Design Studies 22 (3): 211–232. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00026-0
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., and T. C. Ormerod. 2000. “Putting Ethnography to Work: The Case for a Cognitive Ethnography of Design.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 (1): 147–168. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J. 2006. “Managing Change: Steering a Course between Intended Strategies and Unanticipated Outcomes.” Long Range Planning 39 (1): 29–49. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. R. 2010. “The Hawthorne Effect in Community Trials in Developing Countries.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13 (4): 357–370. doi: 10.1080/13645570903269096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedny, G. Z., and S. R. Harris. 2005. “The Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to the Study of Human Work.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 12 (2): 128–147. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1202_4
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, M., A. Ericson, M. Larsson, H. Nergard, T. Larsson, and B. Renstrom. 2008. “Needs as a Basis for Design Rationale.” Proceedings DESIGN 2008, the 10th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Blandford, A., and S. Attfield. 2010. “Interacting with Information.” Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 3 (1): 1–99. doi: 10.2200/S00227ED1V01Y200911HCI006
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, L. T. M., and A. Chakrabarti. 2009. DRM, a Design Research Methodology. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, L. T. M., A. Chakrabarti, and K. M. Wallace. 1998. “An Overview of Descriptive Studies in Relation to a General Design Research Methodology.” In Designers – The Key to Successful Product Development, edited by E. Frankenberger, 42–56. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. E., and A. Ockenfels. 2014. “Does Laboratory Trading Mirror Behaviour in Real World Markets?: Fair Bargaining and Competitive Bidding on EBay.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation 97: 143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, L., S. Castro, R. C. Brownson, J. Claus, and C. T. Orleans. 2011. “Accelerating Evidence Reviews and Broadening Evidence Standards to Identify Effective, Promising, and Emerging Policy and Environmental Strategies for Prevention of Childhood Obesity.” Annual Review of Public Health 32: 199–223. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R. O. 2006. “On Theory-Driven Design and Deployment of Collaboration Systems.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (7): 573–582. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrizosa, K., and S. Sheppard. 2000. “The Importance of Learning Styles in Group Design Work.” Frontiers in education conference, 2000, FIE 2000, 30th Annual, 1:T2B/12–T2B/17 vol. 1, October 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, P. 2012. Characterising the Relationship between Practice and Laboratory-based Studies of Designers for Critical Design Situations. Bath: University of Bath, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, P., B. J. Hicks, and S. J. Culley. 2010. “An Information Requirement Strategy for Capturing and Analysing Design Activity and Behaviour.” Design 2010 international design conference, Dubrovnik, May 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, P., B. J. Hicks, and S. J. Culley. 2013. “A Comparison of Designer Activity Using Core Design Situations in the Laboratory and Practice.” Design Studies 34 (5): 575–611. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, P., B. J. Hicks, S. J. Culley, and F. Salustri. 2011. “Designer Behaviour and Activity: An Industrial Observation Method.” ICED 11 international conference on engineering design, Copenhagen, August 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, P. R., and C. E. I. Noble. 1986. “Engineering Design Data Management.” 1st international conference on engineering management, theory and applications, Swansea, September 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chenouard, R., P. Sebastian, and L. Granvilliers. 2007. “Solving an Air Conditioning System Problem in an Embodiment Design Context Using Constraint Satisfaction Techniques.” In Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming CP 2007: 13th International Conference, CP 2007, Providence, RI, USA, September 25–29, edited by Christian Bessiere, 18–32. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. L. 1962. “The Hawthorne Effect in Educational Research.” The Phi Delta Kappan 44 (3): 116–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G., S. J. Edgett, and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 2002. “Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do.” Research-Technology Management 45 (5): 21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2007. “Forty Years of Design Research.” Design Studies 28 (1): 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S. J. 2005. “Autoethnography: A Tool for Practice and Education.” 6th ACM SIGCHI international conference on computer-human interaction making CHI natural – CHINZ 05, 1, New Zealand, June 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• D'Astous, P., F. Detienne, W. Visser, and P. N. Robillard. 2004. “Changing Our View on Design Evaluation Meetings Methodology: A Study of Software Technical Review Meetings.” Design Studies 25 (6): 625–655. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2003.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devereaux, P. J., and S. Yusuf. 2003. “The Evolution of the Randomized Controlled Trial and Its Role in Evidence-based Decision Making.” Journal of Internal Medicine 254 (2): 105–113. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01201.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaper, G. 1990. “The Hawthorne Effect: A Fresh Examination.” Educational Studies; Dorchester-on-Thames 16 (3): 261–267. doi: 10.1080/0305569900160305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, D., and S. Ferencikova. 2010. “More than Just National Cultural Distance: Testing New Distance Scales on FDI in Slovakia.” International Business Review 19 (1): 46–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyba, T., and T. Dingsoyr. 2008. “Empirical Studies of Agile Software Development: A Systematic Review.” Information and Software Technology 50 (9–10): 833–859. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, A., and J. Heckman. 2009. “Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326 (5952): 535–538. doi: 10.1126/science.1168244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, S., and J. R. Dixon. 1989a. “A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part I: Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Computer-Based Models of Design Processes.” Research in Engineering Design 1 (1): 51–67. doi: 10.1007/BF01580003
   Google Scholar
• Finger, S., and J. R. Dixon. 1989b. “A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part II: Representations, Analysis, and Design for the Life Cycle.” Research in Engineering Design 1 (2): 121–137. doi: 10.1007/BF01580205
   Google Scholar
• Flay, B. R., A. Biglan, R. F. Boruch, F. G. Castro, D. Gottfredson, S. Kellam, E. K. Moscicki, S. Schinke, J. C. Valentine, and P. Ji. 2005. “Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination.” Prevention Science 6 (3): 151–175. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallivan, M., and M. Srite. 2005. “Information Technology and Culture: Identifying Fragmentary and Holistic Perspectives of Culture.” Information and Organization 15 (4): 295–338. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., and K. M. Emmons. 2007. “How can We Increase Translation of Research into Practice? Types of Evidence Needed.” Annual Review of Public Health 28 (1): 413–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., and T. D. Cook. 2007. “Where Does Good Evidence Come From?” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30 (3): 307–323. doi: 10.1080/17437270701614790
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., and M. W. Dickson. 1996. “Teams in Organizations: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness.” Annual Review of Psychology 47 (1): 307–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, R. E., F. Weber, and K. S. Panwar. 2000. “Engineering Knowledge Management – Current Status and Future Challenges.” ICE 2000 international conference on concurrent enterprising, Toulouse, France, June 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, J., J. Hailpern, and K. G. Karahalios. 2008. “VCode and VData: Illustrating a New Framework for Supporting the Video Annotation Workflow.” Conference on advanced visual interfaces, 317–321. New York: ACM, May 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, C. 1987. Analysis of the Engineering Design Process in an Industrial Context. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. J., S. J. Culley, R. D. Allen, and G. Mullineux. 2002. “A Framework for the Requirements of Capturing, Storing and Reusing Information and Knowledge in Engineering Design.” International Journal of Information Management 22 (4): 263–280. doi: 10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00012-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Revised and Expanded. 3rd ed, 3 vols. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, J. D. 2001. “Hawthorne Effects and Research into Professional Practice.” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (1): 65–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00280.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, I. 2004. “A Treatise on Order in Engineering Design Research.” Research in Engineering Design 15 (3): 155–181. doi: 10.1007/s00163-004-0052-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J. 2008. Information Management for Creative Stimuli in Engineering Design. University of Bath, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., S. J. Culley, and E. Dekoninck. 2010. “Reuse of Ideas and Concepts for Creative Stimuli in Engineering Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (8): 565–581. doi: 10.1080/09544821003598573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, G., S. J. Culley, C. McMahon, and C. Fortin. 2007. “Making Sense of Engineering Design Review Activities.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM 21 (3): 243–266. doi: 10.1017/S0890060407000261
   Google Scholar
• Huet, G., C. McMahon, F. Sellini, S. J. Culley, and C. Fortin. 2007. “Knowledge Loss in Design Reviews.” In Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering II, edited by S. Tichkiewitch, M. Tollenaere, and P. Ray, 277–291. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jakesch, M., M. Zachhuber, H. Leder, M. Spingler, and C. C. Carbon. 2011. “Scenario-based Touching: On the Influence of Top-down Processes on Tactile and Visual Appreciation.” Research in Engineering Design 22 (3): 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00163-010-0102-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O., E. Van de Vliert, and M. West. 2004. “The Bright and Dark Sides of Individual and Group Innovation: A Special Issue Introduction.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 25 (2): 129–145. doi: 10.1002/job.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. 1998. Research Design in Clinical Psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. J., and M. L. Maher. 2008. “The Impact of Tangible User Interfaces on Spatial Cognition during Collaborative Design.” Design Studies 29 (3): 222–253. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. W., J. Casto, and H. Jones. 1994. Communication by Engineers: A Literature Review of Engineers' Information Needs, Seeking Processes, and Use. Washington, DC: Council on Library Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B. A. 1996. “Evaluating Software Engineering Methods and Tool Part 1: The Evaluation Context and Evaluation Methods.” ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 21 (1): 11–14. doi: 10.1145/381790.381795
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B. A., S. L. Pfleeger, L. M. Pickard, P. W. Jones, D. C. Hoaglin, K. El-Emam, and J. Rosenberg. 2002. “Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 (8): 721–734. doi: 10.1109/TSE.2002.1027796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., and M. D. Myers. 1999. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 23 (1): 67–93. doi: 10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., and H. Singh. 1988. “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode.” Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3): 411–432. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, K., and M. C. Masatu. 2006. “Outpatient Process Quality Evaluation and the Hawthorne Effect.” Social Science & Medicine 63 (9): 2330–2340. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethbridge, T. C., S. E. Sim, and J. Singer. 2005. “Studying Software Engineers: Data Collection Techniques for Software Field Studies.” Empirical Software Engineering 10 (3): 311–341. doi: 10.1007/s10664-005-1290-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. D., and J. A. List. 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2): 153–174. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M., and J. Moultrie. 2005. “The Organisational Innovation Laboratory.” Creativity and Innovation Management 14 (1): 73–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00327.x
   Google Scholar
• LiveScribe. 2011. “LiveScribe: Never Miss a Word.” Accessed October 2011 http://www.livescribe.com/en-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K. 2001. “Qualitative Research: Standards, Challenges, and Guidelines.” The Lancet 358 (9280): 483–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManicTime. 2011. “ManicTime – Time Management Software [Online].” Accessed October 2011. http://www.manictime.com/.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, H. 2010. Improving the Management of Informal Engineering Information through Electronic Logbooks. University of Bath, Dept. Mechanical Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, H., P. Cash, A. Storton, and S. J. Culley. 2011. “A Technology Selection Process for the Optimal Capture of Design Information.” ICORD 11 international conference on research into design, Bangalore, January 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, H., B. J. Hicks, and S. J. Culley. 2009. “Comparing Formal and Informal Documents: Lessons for More Complete Design Records.” ICED 09 international conference on engineering design, Stanford University, Stanford, USA, August 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, H., B. J. Hicks, G. Huet, and S. J. Culley. 2006. “An Investigation into the Use and Content of the Engineer's Logbook.” Design Studies 27 (4): 481–504. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandliss, B. D., M. Kalchman, and P. Bryant. 2003. “Design Experiments and Laboratory Approaches to Learning: Steps toward Collaborative Exchange.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 14–16. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001014
   Google Scholar
• Panopto. 2012. “Panopto”. Panopto Europe Ltd. Accessed February 2012. www.panopto.com
   Google Scholar
• Petre, M. 2004. “How Expert Engineering Teams Use Disciplines of Innovation.” Design Studies 25 (5): 477–493. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, K. E., and M. Pearl. 2001. “Multilevel Analyses of Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Context and Health Outcomes: A Critical Review.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 55 (2): 111–122. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioural Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C., and N. Mays. 1995. “Reaching the Parts Other Methods Cannot Reach: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods in Health and Health Services Research.” BMJ British Medical Journal 311 (6996): 42–45. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhomme, G., F. Pourroy, and K. Lund. 2007. “An Empirical Study of Engineering Knowledge Dynamics in a Design Situation.” Journal of Design Research 6 (3): 333–358. doi: 10.1504/JDR.2007.016388
   Google Scholar
• Puttre, M. 1991. “Product Data Management.” Mechanical Engineering 113 (10): 81–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. A. 2010. “An Empirical Analysis of Engineers’ Information Behaviours.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (4): 640–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, H., J. Segal, and H. Sharp. 2007. “Ethnographically-Informed Empirical Studies of Software Practice.” Information and Software Technology 49 (6): 540–551. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research. 2nd ed, 2 vols. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Scaravetti, D., and P. Sebastian. 2009. “Design Space Exploration in Embodiment Design: An Application to the Design of Aircraft Air Conditioners.” International Journal of Product Development 9 (1): 292–307. doi: 10.1504/IJPD.2009.026182
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C. 1999. “Quality in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 5 (4): 465–478. doi: 10.1177/107780049900500402
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C., and D. Silverman. 1997. “Ensuring Rigour in Qualitative Research.” European Journal of Public Health 7 (4): 379–384. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/7.4.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., and L. L. Gilson. 2004. “What Leaders Need to Know: A Review of Social and Contextual Factors That Can Foster or Hinder Creativity.” The Leadership Quarterly 15 (1): 33–53. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., D. C. Phillips, L. Towne, and M. J. Feuer. 2003. “On the Science of Education Design Studies.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 25–28. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001025
   Google Scholar
• Shenkar, O. 2001. “Cultural Distance Revisited: Towards a More Rigorous Conceptualization and Measurement of Cultural Differences.” Journal of International Business Studies 32 (3): 519–535. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. L. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships between Team Design Features and Team Performance.” Journal of Management 32 (1): 29–55. doi: 10.1177/0149206305277792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torlind, P., N. Sonalkar, M. Bergstrom, E. Blanco, B. J. Hicks, and H. McAlpine. 2009. “Lessons Learned and Future Challenges for Design Observatory Research.” ICED 09 international conference on engineering design. Stanford, CA, August 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Torlind, P., M. Stenius, M. Johanson, and P. Jeppsson. 1999. “Collaboration Environments for Distributed Engineering Development of a Prototype System.” Computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD) 99, Compiègne, France.
   Google Scholar
• Veldman, J., and A. Alblas. 2012. “Managing Design Variety, Process Variety and Engineering Change: A Case Study of Two Capital Good Firms.” Research in Engineering Design 23 (4): 269–290. doi: 10.1007/s00163-012-0135-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, W. 2009. “Design: One, but in Different Forms.” Design Studies 30 (3): 187–223. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasiak, J., B. J. Hicks, L. Newnes, A. Dong, and L. Burrow. 2010. “Understanding Engineering Email: The Development of a Taxonomy for Identifying and Classifying Engineering Work.” Research in Engineering Design 21 (1): 43–64. doi: 10.1007/s00163-009-0075-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, P. J., S. J. Culley, C. McMahon, M. Darlington, and S. Liu. 2005. “Starting to Audit Documents in the Engineering Domain.” In In-Use, In-Situ: Extending Field Research Methods, edited by P. Amaldi, S. P. Gill, B. Fields, and W. Wong, 36–40. London: Higher Education Academy Information and Computer Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, P. J., C. McMahon, M. Darlington, S. Liu, and S. J. Culley. 2010. “A Diary Study of Information Needs and Document Usage in the Engineering Domain.” Design Studies 31 (1): 46–73. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildemuth, B. M. 1993. “Post-Positivist Research: Two Examples of Methodological Pluralism.” The Library Quarterly 63 (4): 450–468. doi: 10.1086/602621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar