Modular redesign methodology for improving plant layout

References

• Andreasen, M. M., S. Kähler, T. Lund, and K. G. Swift. 1988. Design for Assembly. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, G., P. Dewhurst, and W. Knight. 2002. Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Daniilidis, C., V. Enßlin, K. G. Eben, and U. Lindemann. 2011. “A Classification Framework for Product Modularization Methods.” DS 68–4: proceedings of the 18th international conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 4: Product and Systems Design, Lyngby/Copenhagen, August 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, W. E., and S. Hosnedl. 2008. Design Engineering a Manual for Enhanced Creativity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, W. E., and S. Hosnedl. 2010. Introduction to Design Engineering: Systematic Creativity and Managment. Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, A., and G. Erixon. 1999. Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms. 1st ed. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Erixon, G. 1996. “Design for Modularity.” In Design for X, 1st ed., edited by G. Q. Huang, 356–379. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• García, R. 2006. Study of Work: Engineering Methods and Measurement of Work. 7th ed. México: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, G. E. 2013. “Analysis of Modularity Implementation Methods from an Assembly and Variety Viewpoints.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturi Technology 66 (9–12): 1959–1976. doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4473-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto, K. 2005. “Modular Product Platform Design.” Doctoral diss., University of Technology, Laboratory of Machine Design, Helsink, 151.
   Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto, K., and O. De Weck. 2007. “Degree of Modularity in Engineering Systems and Products with Technical and Business Constraints.” Concurrent Engineering 15 (2): 113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto, K., E. S. Suh, and O. De Weck. 2005. “Tradeoff Between Modularity and Performance for Engineered Systems and Products.” In ICED 05: 15th International Conference on Engineering Design: Engineering Design and the Global Economy, August, 15–18, edited by A. Samuel and W. Lewis. Barton: Engineers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. C., and A. Kusiak. 1998. “Modularity in Design of Products and Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 28 (1): 66–77. doi: 10.1109/3468.650323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubka, V., and W. E. Eder. 1988. Theory of Technical System: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hubka, V., and W. E. Eder. 1996. Design Science: Introduction to the Needs, Scope and Organization of Engineering Design Knowledge. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas Engineering & Systems Ltd., and University of Hull. 1989. Design for Assembly Practitioners Manual. 5th ed. Hull: University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. 2000. “The Knowledge-creating Company.” Harvard Business Review 69 (6): 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, K., and K. Wood. 2001. Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and K. H. Grote. 2007. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 3rd ed. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroza, A. R., and S. Ortiz. 2008. “Technology's Strategic Management in the Pre-development of New Products.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 3 (3): 100–111.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, D. V. 1993. Using the Design Structure Method. NSF Report. Washington, DC: NSF.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T., and S. Eppinger. 2012. Product Design and Development. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vokurka, R. J., and S. W. O'Leary-Kelly. 2000. “A Review of Empirical Research on Manufacturing Flexibility.” Journal of Operations Management 18 (4): 485–501. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00031-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar