Impact of technology infusion on system architecture complexity

References

• Ameri, F., J. Summers, G. Mocko, and M. Porter. 2008. “Engineering Design Complexity: An Investigation of Methods and Measures.” Research in Engineering Design 19 (2–3): 161–179. doi: 10.1007/s00163-008-0053-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., and K. B. Clark. 2000. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir, H. A., and V. Thomson. 1999. “Estimating Design Complexity.” Journal of Engineering Design 10 (3): 247–257. doi: 10.1080/095448299261317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloebaum, C. L., and A. McGowan. 2012. “The Design of Large-Scale Complex Engineered Systems: Present Challenges and Future Promise.” Paper presented at the 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis, IN, September 17–19, Paper No. AIAA-2012-5571.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour, E., S. Deniaud, and J.-P. Micaëlli. 2013. “A Method for Jointly Drawing up the Functional and Design Architectures of Complex Systems During the Preliminary System-Definition Phase.” Journal of Engineering Design 24 (4): 305–319. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.737457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braha, D., and O. Maimon. 1998. “The Measurement of a Design Structural and Functional Complexity.” IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans 28 (4): 527–535. doi: 10.1109/3468.686715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bralia, J. 1986. Handbook of Product Design for Manufacturing: A Practical Guide to Low-Cost Production. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B. 1968. “Delphi Process: A Methodology Used for the Elicitation of Opinions of Experts.” RAND Corporation Report No. RAND-P-3925. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, T. R. 2001. “Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (3): 292–306. doi: 10.1109/17.946528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiriac, N., D. Lysy, E. S. Suh, and K. Hölttä-Otto. 2011. “Level of Modularity and Different Levels of System Granularity.” Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (10): 101007-1–101007-10. doi: 10.1115/1.4005069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. J., C. Simons, and C. Eckert. 2004. “Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (5): 788–797. doi: 10.1115/1.1765117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo-Varela, J. R. 2011. “A Multi-Metric Analysis to Quantify and Assess the Design Complexity of Medical Devices.” PhD diss., Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• El-Haik, B., and K. Yang. 1999. “The Components of Complexity in Engineering Design.” IIE Transactions 31 (10): 925–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmaraghy, W., H. Elmaraghy, T. Tomiyama, and L. Monostori. 2012. “Complexity in Engineering Design and Manufacturing.” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 61 (2): 793–814. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A., and T. R. Browning. 2008. “Designing Systems for Adaptability by Means of Architecture Options.” Systems Engineering 11 (2): 125–146. doi: 10.1002/sys.20090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppinger, S. D., and T. R. Browning. 2012. Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, M., and M. Tiwari. 2014. “A Predictive Risk Evaluation Framework for Modular Product Concept Selection in new Product Design Environment.” Journal of Engineering Design 25 (1–3): 150–171. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2014.921806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto, K., and O. De Weck. 2007. “Degree of Modularity in Engineering Systems and Products with Technical and Business Constraints.” Concurrent Engineering 15 (2): 113–126. doi: 10.1177/1063293X07078931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, D. H. 2011. “Influence of System Architecture Changes on Organizational Work Flow and Application to Geared Turbofan Engines.” PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jarratt, T., C. Eckert, N. Caldwell, and P. Clarkson. 2011. “Engineering Change: An Overview and Perspective on the Literature.” Research in Engineering Design 22: 103–124. doi: 10.1007/s00163-010-0097-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenab, K., A. Sarfaraz, and M. T. Ameli. 2013. “A Conceptual Design Selection Model Considering Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Engineering Design 24 (4): 293–304. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.728203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, R. 2007. “Predicting Change Propagation: Algorithms, Representations, Software Tools.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, E. C., N. H. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2013. “A Technique to Assess the Changeability of Complex Engineering Systems.” Journal of Engineering Design 24 (7): 477–498. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2013.769207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann, U., M. Maurer, and T. Braun. 2009. Structural Complexity Management. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mankins, J. C. 1995. “Technology Readiness Levels.” White Paper, April, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Min, G., E. Suh, and K. Hölttä‐Otto. 2014. “Impact of Technology Infusion on System Complexity.” Council on Engineering Systems Universities Conference, Hoboken, NJ, June 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Min, G., E. S. Suh, and K. Hölttä-Otto. 2016. “System Architecture, Level of Decomposition, and Structural Complexity: Analysis and Observations.” Journal of Mechanical Design 138 (2): 021102-1–021102-11.
   Google Scholar
• Morkos, B., P. Shankar, and J. D. Summers. 2012. “Predicting Requirement Change Propagation, Using Higher Order Design Structure Matrices: An Industry Case Study.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (12): 905–926. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.662273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., and W. Beitz. 2013. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Rechtin, E., and M. W. Maier. 2010. The Art of Systems Architecting. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, K. 2014. “Structural Complexity and Its Implications for Design of Cyber-Physical Systems.” PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, K., and O. L. De Weck. 2013. “A Network-Based Structural Complexity Metric for Engineered Complex Systems.” Paper presented at the 2013 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), Orlando, Florida, April 15–18, 426–430.
   Google Scholar
• Smaling, R., and O. De Weck. 2007. “Assessing Risks and Opportunities of Technology Infusion in System Design.” Systems Engineering 10 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1002/sys.20061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa, M. E., S. D. Eppinger, and C. M. Rowles. 2003. “Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions.” Journal of Mechanical Design 125 (2): 240–252. doi: 10.1115/1.1564074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitas, C. 2011. “Analysis of Systematic Engineering Design Paradigms in Industrial Practice: A Survey.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (6): 427–445. doi: 10.1080/09544820903437734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1998. “Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems.” Research in Engineering Design-Theory Applications and Concurrent Engineering 10 (4): 189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 2005. Complexity: Theory and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, E. S., M. R. Furst, K. J. Mihalyov, and O. De Weck. 2010. “Technology Infusion for Complex Systems: A Framework and Case Study.” Systems Engineering 13 (2): 186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, J. D., and J. J. Shah. 2010. “Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability.” Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (2): 021004-1–021004-11. doi: 10.1115/1.4000759
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and C. H. Loch. 1999. “Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (2): 160–172. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00041-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyuker, E. J. 1988. “Evaluating Software Complexity Measures.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14 (9): 1357–1365. doi: 10.1109/32.6178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, D. E. 2004. Mechanical Assemblies: Their Design, Manufacture, and Role in Product Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., D. Xue, and P. Gu. 2015. “Adaptable Design of Open Architecture Products with Robust Performance.” Journal of Engineering Design 26 (1–3): 1–23. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2015.1012055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar