Design for human safety in manufacturing systems: applications of design theories, methodologies, tools and techniques

References

• Alting, L., and J. Jøgensen. 1993. “The Life Cycle Concept as a Basis for Sustainable Industrial Production.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 42 (1): 163–167. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62417-2
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G. 1984. Creativity as an Exact Science. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G. 1999. The Innovation Algorithm. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasen, M. M. 2011. “45 Years with Design Methodology.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (May 2015): 293–332. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2010.538040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas, E. 2014. “An Integrated Quality Function Deployment and Capital Budgeting Methodology for Occupational Safety and Health as a Systems Thinking Approach: The Case of the Construction Industry.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 68: 42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Gal, I., and J. Bukchin. 2002. “The Ergonomic Design of Workstations Using Virtual Manufacturing and Response Surface Methodology.” IIE Transactions 34: 375–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyon, D. 1992. “The Role of Task Analysis in Systems Design.” Interacting with Computers 4: 102–123. doi: 10.1016/0953-5438(92)90015-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, G., and P. Dewhurst. 1983. Design for Assembly: A Designer’s Handbook. Technique Report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Chinniah, Y. 2015. “Analysis and Prevention of Serious and Fatal Accidents Related to Moving Parts of Machinery.” Safety Science 75: 163–173. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753515000326. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M.-C., and G. E. Okudan. 2010. “Evolution of Design for X Tools Applicable to Design Stages: A Literature Review.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference information in engineering conference, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Coulibaly, A., R. Houssin, and B. Mutel. 2008. “Maintainability and Safety Indicators at Design Stage for Mechanical Products.” Computers in Industry 59 (5): 438–449. Accessed March 22, 2013. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166361507001856. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R., and C. Poli. 1995. Engineering Design and Design for Manufacturing: A Structured Approach. Conway, MA: Field Stone.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, C. G. 1983. “Task Analysis Methods in Industry.” Applied Ergonomics 14 (1): 19–28. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(83)90215-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duijne, F. van, A. Hale, H. Kanis, and B. Green. 2007. “Design for Safety: Involving Users’ Perspectives. Redesign Proposals for Gas Lamps Using a Pierceable Cartridge.” Safety Science 45: 253–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukic, T., M. Rönnäng, and M. Christmansson. 2007. “Evaluation of Ergonomics in a Virtual Manufacturing Process.” Journal of Engineering Design 18 (2): 125–137. doi: 10.1080/09544820600675925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, I. 2005. Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety. Hob: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1989. “ Directive 89/392/EEC of the European Parliament and of the Council Directive of 14 June 1989 on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to machinery (OJ L 183, 29 June).”
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. “ Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 17 May 2006 on Machinery, and Amending Directive 95/16/EC (Recast). OJ. 2006; L157:24–86.”
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2010. “ Safety of Machinery – General Principles for Design – Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction.” Brussels: CENELEC; 2010. Standard No. NF EN ISO 12100:2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fadier, E., and J. Ciccotelli. 1999. “How to Integrate Safety in Design: Methods and Models.” Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing 9 (4): 367–379. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199923)9:4<367::AID-HFM4>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadier, E., C. Poyet, and M. Neboit. 1991. “Advantage of an Integrated Approach of Reliability and Ergonomical Ana-Lysis (Application to a Hybrid System of Sequential Production).” In Designing for Everyone, edited by Y. Quéinnec and F. Daniellou, 477–479. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F. 2002. Advanced Quality Function Deployment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC. http://6sigmaindia.in/Documents/R4 Quality Function Deployment.pdf, http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:advanced+quality+function+deployment#0.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, F., and F. Charron. 2002. “A Structured Procedure of Risk Analysis and Control for Safety Integration in Machinery Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 13: 77–99. doi: 10.1080/09544820210129814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, P., S. C. Y. Lu, and N. P. Suh. 2002. “An Axiomatic Approach for ‘Target Cascading’ of Parametric Design of Engineering Systems.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 51 (1): 111–114. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61478-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. 1990. “Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Scheme for Design.” AI Magazine 11 (4): 26–36. doi: 10.1109/62.63160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., and U. Kannengiesser. 2004. “The Situated Function-Behaviour-Structure Framework.” Design Studies 25: 373–391. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghemraoui, R., L. Mathieu, and N. Tricot. 2009a. “Design Method for Systematic Safety Integration.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 58: 161–164. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghemraoui, R., L. Mathieu, and N. Tricot. 2009b. “Systematic Human-Safety Analysis Approach Based on Axiomatic Design Principles.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the 5th international conference on axiomatic design, ICAD 2009, 8. http://www.axiomaticdesign.com/technology/icad/icad2009/icad2009_01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. D., and C. Lewis. 1985. “Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think.” Communications of the ACM 28 (3): 300–311. doi: 10.1145/3166.3170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulliksen, J., B. Göransson, I. Boivie, S. Blomkvist, J. Persson, and Å. Cajander. 2003. “Key Principles for User-Centred Systems Design.” Behaviour & Information Technology 22 (6): 397–409. doi: 10.1080/01449290310001624329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, A., and D. Borys. 2013. “Working to Rule, or Working Safely? Part 1: A State of the Art Review.” Safety Science 55: 207–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms-Ringdahl, L. 1987. “Safety Analysis in Design-Evaluation of a Case Study.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 19 (4): 305–317. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90064-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R., A. Bernard, J. Ciccotelli, and P. Martin. 2003. “Integrating Safety into the Design Process: Elements and Concepts Relative to the Working Situation.” Safety Science 41 (2–3): 155–179. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753502000024. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R., P. Martin, and A. Bernard. 2004. “Solving Contradictions Problems Related To Safety Integration In Design Process.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the TRIZ conference, Nancy.
   Google Scholar
• Helander, M. G. 2007. “Using Design Equations to Identify Sources of Complexity in Human–Machine Interaction.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 (2): 123–146. doi: 10.1080/14639220601092442
   Google Scholar
• Helander, M. G., and J. Jiao. 2002. “Coupling in Design of Human Computer Interaction.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the second international conference on axiomatic design, ICAD 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Helander, M. G., and L. Lin. 2000. “Anthropometric Design of Workstations.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the first international conference on axiomatic design, ICAD 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Helander, M. G., and L. Lin. 2002. “Axiomatc Design in Ergonomics and an Extension of the Information Axiom.” Journal of Engineering Design 13 (4): 321–339. doi: 10.1080/0954482021000050794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hemel, C. G., and T. Keldman. 1996. “Applying ‘Design for X’ Experience in Design for Environment.” In Design for X: Concurrent Engineering Imperatives, edited by G. Q. Huang, 72–95. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, G., and S. K. Lee. 2007. “Design Evaluation of Emergency Core Cooling Systems Using Axiomatic Design.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 237: 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E. 2008. “Risk + Barriers = Safety?” Safety Science 46: 221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R., and C. Barnes. 2010. “Towards an Integrated Approach to ‘design for X’: An Agenda for Decision-Based DFX Research.” Research in Engineering Design 21: 123–136. doi: 10.1007/s00163-009-0081-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houssin, R., A. Bernard, P. Martin, G. Ris, and F. Cherrier. 2006. “Information System Based on a Working Situation Model for a New Design Approach in Concurrent Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Design 17 (1): 35–54. Accessed March 22, 2013. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09544820500276048. doi: 10.1080/09544820500276048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houssin, R., and M. Cardoni. 2009. “Software Framework for the Approach: Computer Aided Safety Integration in Design Process (CASID).” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems 8 (1): 27–45. doi: 10.1142/S0219686709001638
   Google Scholar
• Houssin, R., and A. Coulibaly. 2011. “An Approach to Solve Contradiction Problems for the Safety Integration in Innovative Design Process.” Computers in Industry 62 (4): 398–406. Accessed March 22, 2013. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166361510001818. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2010.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houssin, R., H. Sun, and M. Gardoni. 2010. “A Behavioural Design Approach to Improving Mechanical System Design with Integration of Use Conditions.” International Journal of Design and Innovation Research 5 (3): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G. Q. 1996. Design for X: Concurrent Engineering Imperatives. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jouffroy, D., S. Demor, J. Ciccotelli, and P. Martin. 1999. “An Approach to Integrate Safety at the Design Stage of Numerically Controlled Woodworking Machines.” Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering. 2nd international conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engi- Neering IDMME'98. Compiegne, France, May 27–29, 643–650, ISBN 0-7923-6024-9.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, K., O. Kwon, and H. You. 2009. “Development of a Digital Human Model Generation Method for Ergonomic Design in Virtual Environment.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (5): 744–748. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karwowski, W. 2005. “Ergonomics and Human Factors: The Paradigms for Science, Engineering, Design, Technology and Management of Human-Compatible Systems.” Ergonomics 48 (5): 436–463. doi: 10.1080/00140130400029167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, F., S. Rathnayaka, and S. Ahmed. 2015. “Methods and Models in Process Safety and Risk Management: Past, Present and Future.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection 98: 116–147. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957582015001275. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan, B., and L. K. Ainsworth. 1992. A Guide to Task Analysis. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellén, U., and S. Sklet. 1995. “Integrating Analyses of the Risk of Occupational Accidents into the Design Process. Part I: A Review of Types of Acceptance Criteria and Risk Analysis Methods.” Safety Science 18 (94): 215–227. doi: 10.1016/0925-7535(94)00053-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, E. 2013. “Design Theory and Conceptual Design: Contrasting Functional Decomposition and Morphology with Parameter Analysis.” Research in Engineering Design 24: 165–183. doi: 10.1007/s00163-012-0149-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, T.-C., S. H. Huang, and H.-C. Zhang. 2001. “Design for Manufacture and Design for ‘X’: Concepts, Applications, and Perspectives.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 41: 241–260. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V27-44B2119-1/2/06b78ac16a3e27ffddc83de87789d737. doi: 10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Masson, P., K. Dorst, and E. Subrahmanian. 2013. “Design Theory: History, State of the Art and Advancements.” Research in Engineering Design 24: 97–103. doi: 10.1007/s00163-013-0154-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., P. B. Chang, T. J. Ayres, C. T. Wood, and M. Park. 2001. “Usability Evaluation for Product Safety.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the make it easy 2001, IBM's conference on Ease of Use, San Jose, CA, June 4–7, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-T., and Y.-L. Tsai. 2012. “A Fuzzy Risk Assessment Approach for Occupational Hazards in the Construction Industry.” Safety Science 50 (4): 1067–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, S., and M. G. Helander. 2007. “Use of Axiomatic Design Principles for Analysing the Complexity of Human–Machine Systems.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 (2): 147–169. doi: 10.1080/14639220601092475
   Google Scholar
• López-Arquillos, A., J. C. Rubio-Romero, and M. D. Martinez-Aires. 2015. “Prevention Through Design (PtD). The Importance of the Concept in Engineering and Architecture University Courses.” Safety Science 73: 8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutters, E., F. J. A. M. van Houten, A. Bernard, E. Mermoz, and C. S. L. Schutte. 2014. “Tools and Techniques for Product Design.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 63: 607–630. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007850614001929. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lux, A., J. M. De Bikond, A. Etienne, and E. Quillerou-grivot. 2015. “FMEA and Consideration of Real Work Situations for Safer Design of Production Systems.” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE). doi:doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1180856.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, M. 2009. “Towards a Framework to Select Techniques for Error Prediction: Supporting Novice Users in the Healthcare Sector.” Applied Ergonomics 40 (3): 379–395. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Määttä, T. 2007. “Human Motion Simulation for Vehicle and Workplace Design.” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 17 (5): 435–443. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Human+Motion+Simulation+for+Vehicle+and+Workplace+Design#1. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madu, C. N. 2000. House of Quality in a Minute. U. C. Fairfield, CT: Chi Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. M., N. A. Kurczewski, and E. W. Froede. 2015. “Design Method for Multi-User Workstations Utilizing Anthropometry and Preference Data.” Applied Ergonomics 46: 60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc, J., N. Belkacem, and J. Marsot. 2007. “Virtual Reality: A Design Tool for Enhanced Consideration of Usability ‘Validation Elements’.” Safety Science 45: 589–601. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsot, J. 2005. “QFD: A Methodological Tool for Integration of Ergonomics at the Design Stage.” Applied Ergonomics 36: 185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsot, J., J. Ciccotelli, and J. Marc. 2007. “Dynamical Indexation of Risk in a Virtual Work Environment.” International Journal of Product Development 4 (6): 570–586. doi: 10.1504/IJPD.2007.013432
   Google Scholar
• Marsot, J., and L. Claudon. 2004. “Design and Ergonomics. Methods for Integrating Ergonomics at Hand Tool Design Stage.” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE) 10 (July 2015): 13–23. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2004.11076591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mavrikios, D., V. Karabatsou, K. Alexopoulos, M. Pappas, P. Gogos, and G. Chryssolouris.. 2006. “An Approach to Human Motion Analysis and Modelling.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36: 979–989. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagamachi, M. 1995. “Kansei Engineering: A New Ergonomic Consumer-Oriented Technology for Product Development.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 15: 3–11. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(94)00052-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, B., L. Monplaisir, and N. Singh. 2006. “A Methodology for Integrating Design for Quality in Modular Product Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 17 (5): 387–409. doi: 10.1080/09544820500275081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NF EN 1325. 2014. Value Management – Vocabulary – Terms and Definitions.
   Google Scholar
• NF EN ISO 9241-11. 1998. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on Usability.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and H. K. Grote. 2007. Engineering Design A Systematic Approach. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rausand, M., and I. B. Utne. 2009. “Product Safety – Principles and Practices in a Life Cycle Perspective.” Safety Science 47 (7): 939–947. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, L. 2014. “Aide À La Décision Pour L’intégration de La Sécurité Au plus Tôt En Phase de Conception-Approche Innovante de Reconception de Machines Agricoles.” École Normale Supérieure de Cachan.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, L., L. Mathieu, N. Tricot, and L. Al Bassit. 2015. “Developing a Safety Indicator to Measure the Safety Level during Design for Safety.” Safety Science 80: 252–263. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092575351500209X. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, L., L. Mathieu, N. Tricot, L. Al Bassit, and R. Ghemraoui. 2013a. “Toward Design for Safety. Part 1: Functional Reverse Engineering Driven by Axiomatic Design.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th international conference on axiomatic design, ICAD 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, L., L. Mathieu, N. Tricot, L. Al Bassit, and R. Ghemraoui. 2013b. “Toward Design for Safety. part 2: Functional Re-Engineering Using Axiomatic Design and FMEA.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th international conference on axiomatic design, ICAD 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sagot, J.-C., V. Gouin, and S. Gomes. 2003. “Ergonomics in Product Design: Safety Factor.” Safety Science 41: 137–154. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753502000383. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00038-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin, J., C. Gaudez, and J. Marsot. 2015. “Dynamic Digital Human Models for Ergonomic Analysis Based on Humanoid Robotics Techniques.” International Journal of the Digital Human 1 (1): 81–109. doi: 10.1504/IJDH.2015.067135
   Google Scholar
• Schoone-Harmsen, M. 1990. “A Design Method for Product Safety.” Ergonomics 33 (4): 431–437. doi: 10.1080/00140139008927147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrokhi, M. 2006. “Intégration D’un Modèle de Situation de Travail Pour L’aide À La Formation et À La Simulation Lors de La Conception et L’industrialisation de Systèmes.” Ecole Centrale de Nantes.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrokhi, M., and A. Bernard. 2009. “A Framework to Develop an Analysis Agent for Evaluating Human Performance in Manufacturing Systems.” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2: 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2009.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Shahrokhi, M., and A. Bernard. 2010. “A Development in Energy Flow/barrier Analysis.” Safety Science 48 (5): 598–606. Accessed September 2, 2013. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753510000111. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklet, S. 2006. “Safety Barriers: Definition, Classification, and Performance.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19: 494–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, V., N. M. Almeida, and L. A. Dias. 2014. “Risk-Based Management of Occupational Safety and Health in the Construction Industry – Part 1: Background Knowledge.” Safety Science 66: 75–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoop, J. 1990. “Scenarios in the Design Process.” Applied Ergonomics 21 (4): 304–310. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(90)90201-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1990. The Principles of Design. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H., R. Houssin, M. Gardoni, and F. de Bauvrond. 2013. “Integration of User Behaviour and Product Behaviour during the Design Phase: Software for Behavioural Design Approach.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 43 (1): 100–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomiyama, T., P. Gu, Y. Jin, D. Lutters, Ch. Kind, and F. Kimura. 2009. “Design Methodologies: Industrial and Educational Applications.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 58: 543–565. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Village, J., M. Greig, and P. Neumann. 2011. “Adapting the Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) for Early Detection of Human Factors Concerns.” Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Conference of the Association of Canadian Ergonomists, London, Ontario, October 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wixson, J. R. 1999. “ Function Analysis and Decomposistion Using Function Analysis Systems Technique.” Citesser. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.127.4279&amp\nrep=rep1&amp\ntype=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H.-C., T.-C. Kuo, and H. Lu. 1997. “Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing a State-of-the-Art Survey.pdf.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 16 (5): 397–409. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6125(97)88465-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar